Md. Nur Islam Sk vs State Of Meghalaya And 5 Ors.
Party Details
- Md. NUR ISLAM SK
- STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS.
Case Summary
Md. NUR ISLAM SK filed Case No. WP(C)/489/2021 in the Meghalaya High Court on 16 Dec 2021 against STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS.. The case has undergone 11 hearings over 8 months. The case was disposed of on 17 Aug 2022. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (11)
- DISPOSED
Judge: N/A
- 17AUG 2022ORDERS
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
- 28JUL 2022ORDERS
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW
Orders (10)
- 7SEP 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 10
- 17AUG 2022orderView Order ↗
Order No: 9
- 28JUL 2022orderView Order ↗
Order No: 8
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
Page 1 of 2 Serial No.
08 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No.
489 of 2021 Date of Decision: 07.09.2022 Md.
Nur Islam SK Vs.
State of Meghalaya & Ors.
Coram: Hon’ble Mr.
Justice H.
S.
Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr.
A.H.
Hazarika, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr.
K.P.
Bhattacharjee, GA (For R 1-3) None (For R 4-6) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1.
The writ petitioner by way of the instant writ petition is before this Court being aggrieved with the manner in which the Bhaitbari Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills District is being administered and has prayed for cancellation of the impugned inquiry report dated 30.04.2021, and the impugned order passed for Page 2 of 2 reconstitution of the new Managing Committee.
It is further prayed that directions be issued to conduct fresh election for reconstitution of the new Managing Committee of the Bhaitbari Higher Secondary School immediately.
2.
An affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent No.
2, wherein the locus of the petitioner has been questioned.
3.
Mr.
Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner though by submitting that there is a strong prima facie case which will call for appropriate orders for reconstitution of the new Managing Committee, which is also evident by the statement made in the affidavit, however has not been able to show his locus standi.
He is neither an affected party nor has been able to substantiate that he is a guardian of any ward studying in the school.
4.
In this view of the matter, no personal injury has been caused to the petitioner nor his fundamental rights been violated in any manner.
5.
The writ petition on the absence of locus of the writ petitioner, is accordingly dismissed.
JUDGE Meghalaya 07.09.2022 “V.
Lyndem-PS”