Rinaldo K Sangma vs State Of Meghalaya And 2 Ors.
Party Details
- RINALDO K SANGMA
- STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS.
Case Summary
RINALDO K SANGMA filed Case No. WP(C)/505/2018 in the Meghalaya High Court on 14 Dec 2018 against STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS.. The case has undergone 2 hearings. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (2)
- DISPOSED
Judge: N/A
- MOTION
Judge: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD YAQOOB MIR, CHIEF JUSTICE (FORMER)
Orders (1)
- 19DEC 2018judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
1 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No.
505 of 2018 Date of order: 19.12.2018 Shri Ronaldo K.
Sangma Vs.
State of Meghalaya & Ors.
Coram: Hon’ble Mr.
Justice Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, Chief Justice Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr.
R.
Gurung, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr.
H.
Abraham, GA i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: ORAL:- 1.
The case set up by the petitioner is that on expiry of the term of outgoing Managing Committee in the month of February 2018 a new Managing Committee was elected, the petitioner is the Secretary of the Committee.
The Managing Committee so elected was submitted to the higher authorities for approval, till date no approval has been received instead a communication has been issued by the District School Education Officer, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong dated 07.08.2018 in terms whereof, the Headmaster of Garo Union Secondary School, Shillong has been asked to explore the possibility to re-constitute the Managing Committee thereafter, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has taken up the matter with respondent No.
3, who has not so far taken any decision but meanwhile, apprehend that the functioning of the present Managing Committee is likely to be disturbed hence, the instant petition.
2.
The petition on the face of it is not maintainable because the Managing Committee so elected is yet to be approved.
For redressal of the grievance petitioner has taken up the matter with respondent No.
3 without waiting for the result thereof, has filed the instant petition.
Suffice it to say that respondent No.
3 shall consider the representation filed by the Serial No.
03 Regular List 2 petitioner dated 13.06.2018 and pass appropriate order thereon in accordance with law preferably within a period of three weeks.
3.
With the aforesaid observations, petition being not maintainable shall accordingly stand disposed of.
4. sed of.
4.
Disposed of as above. (Mohammad Yaqoob Mir) Chief Justice Meghalaya 19.12.2018 “Sylvana PS”