Meta Pixel
CNR: MLHC010002492021
DISPOSED

Deborah Betsi Giri And Another. vs Managing Director, Meghalaya Cooperative Marketing And Consumer Federation And 2 Others.

Case NumberWP(C)/116/2021
Date of Filing19 Mar 2021
Case TypeWP(C)
Last Hearing30 Mar 2021
State--
City--
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • DEBORAH BETSI GIRI AND ANOTHER.
Respondent
  • MANAGING DIRECTOR
  • MEGHALAYA COOPERATIVE MARKETING AND CONSUMER FEDERATION AND 2 OTHERS.

Case Summary

DEBORAH BETSI GIRI AND ANOTHER. filed Case No. WP(C)/116/2021 in the Meghalaya High Court on 19 Mar 2021 against MANAGING DIRECTOR and MEGHALAYA COOPERATIVE MARKETING AND CONSUMER FEDERATION AND 2 OTHERS.. The case has undergone 4 hearings over 7 days. The case was disposed of on 30 Mar 2021. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (4)

  • DISPOSED

    Judge: N/A

  • 30MAR 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

  • 23MAR 2021
    ORDERS

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

  • MOTION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

Orders (3)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Page 1 of 2 Serial No.

20 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No.

116 of 2021 Date of Decision: 29.11.2021 Smti Deborah Betsi Giri & Anr.

Vs.

The Managing Director, Meghalaya Cooperative Marketing & Consumer Federation & Ors.

Coram: Hon’ble Mr.

Justice H.

S.

Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr.

S.A.

Sheikh, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Mr.

P.

Yobin, Adv. (For R 1) Mr.

N.D.

Chullai, AAG with Ms.

R.

Colney, GA Ms.

Z.E.

Nongkynrih, GA (For R 2&3) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1.

Mr.

Yobin, learned counsel for the respondent No.

1, who is the material respondent at the outset submits that the writ petitioners herein who are the wives/legal heirs of the deceased employees had never approached the concerned respondent for release of the sanctioned amount which was payable by way of the Voluntary Retirement Scheme.

He further submits that if the writ petitioners approach the respondent, their grievances would be looked into and the amounts cleared, subject to production of valid Page 2 of 2 succession certificate indicating their rights granted in their favour, as far as the benefits of the deceased employees are concerned.

2.

The submissions are noted and accepted.

Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to approach the respondent No.

1 with valid Succession Certificates issued in their favour for release of the terminal benefits of the deceased employees.

3.

With the above noted direction, this instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE Meghalaya 29.11.2021 “V.

Lyndem-PS”