Meta Pixel
CNR: MLHC010000132021
DISPOSED

Kamlesh Yadav. vs Raman Kaushik.

Case NumberCont.Cas(C)/2/2021
Date of Filing11 Jan 2021
Case TypeCont.Cas(C)
Last Hearing1 Mar 2022
State--
City--
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • KAMLESH YADAV.
Respondent
  • RAMAN KAUSHIK.

Case Summary

KAMLESH YADAV. filed Case No. Cont.Cas(C)/2/2021 in the Meghalaya High Court on 11 Jan 2021 against RAMAN KAUSHIK.. The case has undergone 11 hearings over 1 year. The case was disposed of on 1 Mar 2022. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (11)

  • DISPOSED

    Judge: N/A

  • 1MAR 2022
    ADMISSION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 11FEB 2022
    ADMISSION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 2DEC 2021
    ADMISSION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 9NOV 2021
    ADMISSION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H. S. THANGKHIEW

  • 21OCT 2021
    ADMISSION

    Judge: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT V. MORE, CHIEF JUSTICE (FORMER)

  • 30SEP 2021
    ADMISSION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

  • 6APR 2021
    ADMISSION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

  • 2MAR 2021
    ADMISSION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

  • 5FEB 2021
    ADMISSION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

  • MOTION

    Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)

Orders (10)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Serial No.12 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Cont.Cas(C).

No.2 of 2021 Date of Order :15.03.2022 Shri.

Kamlesh Yadav Vs.

Shri.

Raman Kaushik.

Coram: Hon’ble Mr.

Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge.

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : None.

For the Respondent(s) : None.

On 01-03-2022, learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time to ascertain the correct address of the respondent.

This contempt application had been filed since 11-01-2021 and the matter concerns violation of interim order dated 04-01-2021 which was operable only for 2(two) weeks.

Although one year has passed, the petitioner has not been able to obtain the correct address nor is he present today.

It appears that he is no longer interested in the matter.

Accordingly, matter stands closed and disposed of.

Judge Meghalaya 15.03.2022 “Samantha PS”