Sachin Vikaram Ghayal, Aurangabad vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle - Aurangabad Aurangabad

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE – VIRTUAL COURT BEFORE SHRI R.S.

SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.534/PUN/2019 िनधारण वष / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Sachin Vikramrao Ghayal, 3384, Pannalal Nagar, Taluka Paithan, Dist.

Aurangabad 431 107 PAN : ALXPG3508M Vs.

ACIT Circle, Aurangabad (Appellant) (Respondent) आदेश / ORDER This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order passed by the CIT(A)-1, Aurangabad on 31-12-2018 in relation to the assessment year 2013-14.

2.

Before me, the assessee has filed a letter dated 10-12-2020 seeking withdrawal of the appeal.

The relevant contents of such letter read as under : “With respect to the above referred appeal, the Appellant has opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 ( ‘DTVSV Act’) to settle the dispute pending before your Honours.

In this reference, the Appellant had submitted Form 1 and Form 2 in accordance with Rule 3 of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Rules, 2020 (‘the Rules’) on 09/06/2020.

Copy of the same is attached Appellant by Ms.

Sarvesha Respondent by Shri.

Sudhendu Das Date of hearing 12-02-2021 Date of pronouncement 12-02-2021 ITA No.

534/PUN/2019 Sachin Vikramrao Ghayal 2 herewith as Annexure-1 for your Honour’s ready reference and record.

Further, the Designated Authority has issued Form 3 in accordance with Rule 3 of the Rules on 19/11/2020 which was received by the Appellant on 19/11/2020.

Copy of the same is attached herewith as Annexure-2 for your Honour’s ready reference and record.

In view of the above, and in accordance with Section 4(3) of the DTVSV Act, the Appellant is hereby withdrawing the current appeal filed on 05/04/2019.

The Appellant undertakes that it shall pay/allow adjustment for the entire demand raised in Form-3 within the prescribed time limit under the DTVSV Act..

The Appellant requests your Honour to kindly grant permission to withdraw the appeal, so that it can proceed under the DTVSV and settle the dispute.” 3.

The ld.

3.

DR did not raise any objection to the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee.

As such, the assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeal.

4.

In the result, the appeal is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 12th February, 2021.

Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) उपाय उपाय उपाय उपाय/ VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune;
दनांक Dated : 12th February, 2021 Satish ITA No.

534/PUN/2019 Sachin Vikramrao Ghayal 3 आदेश आदेश आदेश आदेश क क क क ितिलिप ितिलिप ितिलिप ितिलिप अ ेिषत अ ेिषत अ ेिषत अ ेिषत / Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. यथ / The Respondent; 3. आयकर आयु(अपील) / The CIT (Appeals)-1, Aurangabad 4.

The Pr.

CIT-1, Aurangabad 5. िवभागीय ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे “SMC” / DR ‘SMC’, ITAT, Pune; 6. गाड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date 1.

Draft dictated on 12-02-2021 Sr.PS 2.

Draft placed before author 12-02-2021 Sr.PS 3.

Draft proposed & placed before the second member -- JM 4.

Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. -- JM 5.

Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6.

Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7.

Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8.

File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9.

Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10.

Date on which file goes to the A.R.

11.

Date of dispatch of Order.