Meta Pixel
CNR: --
FIXED

M/s. Fontasey Engineering Exports Pvt.Ltd, Pune vs Income Tax Office, Ward -1 (4), Pune

Case NumberITA 1120/PUN/2019
Date of Filing19 Jul 2019
Case TypeIncome Tax Appeal|ITA
Last Hearing--
State--
City--
Year of Filing2019

Party Details

Petitioner
  • M/s. Fontasey Engineering Exports Pvt.Ltd, Pune
Respondent
  • Income Tax Office, Ward -1 (4), Pune

Case Summary

M/s. Fontasey Engineering Exports Pvt.Ltd, Pune vs Income Tax Office, Ward -1 (4), Pune (Case No. ITA 1120/PUN/2019) is listed in the Income Tax, filed on 19 Jul 2019. The case has had one hearing so far. The case is currently pending. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S.

SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.

1120/PUN/2019 िनधारण वष / Assessment Year : 2003-04 M/s.

Fontasey Engineering Exports Pvt.

Ltd., 11, Commerce Centre, Paud Road, Rambaug colony, Kothrud, Pune 411 038 PAN : AAACF4147J Vs.

ITO, Ward-1(4), Pune (Appellant) (Respondent) आदेश / ORDER PER R.S.SYAL, VP : This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order passed by the CIT(A)-1, Pune on 15-05-2019 in relation to the assessment year 2003-04.

2.

I have heard the ld.

DR and perused the relevant material on record.

There is no appearance from the side of the assessee despite several notices.

As such, I am proceeding to dispose of the appeal ex parte qua the assessee.

Appellant by None Respondent by Shri V.K.

Singh Date of hearing 03-01-2020 Date of pronouncement 03-01-2020 ITA No.1120/PUN/2019 M/s.

Ltd., 2 3.

It is seen that the ld.

CIT(A) has passed the order ex-parte qua the assessee.

The assessee has raised a ground to the effect that the ld.

CIT(A) did not give reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee and dismissed the appeal.

In view of the foregoing facts, I am of the considered opinion that the ends of justice would meet adequately if the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is restored to the file of ld.

CIT(A).

I order accordingly and direct the ld.

CIT(A) to decide the appeal afresh as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

4.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 03rd January, 2020.

Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) उपाय उपाय उपाय उपाय/ VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; दनांक Dated : 03rd January, 2020 सतीश ITA No.1120/PUN/2019 M/s.

Ltd., 3 आदेश आदेश आदेश आदेश क क क क ितिलिप ितिलिप ितिलिप ितिलिप अ ेिषत अ ेिषत अ ेिषत अ ेिषत / Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. ellant; 2. यथ / The Respondent; 3. आयकर आयु(अपील) / The CIT (Appeals)-1, Pune 4.

The Pr.

CIT-1, Pune 5. िवभागीय ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे “SMC” / DR ‘SMC’, ITAT, Pune; 6. गाड फाईल / Guard file. // True copy // आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date 1.

Draft dictated on 03-01-2020 Sr.PS 2.

Draft placed before author 03-01-2020 Sr.PS 3.

Draft proposed & placed before the second member -- JM 4.

Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. -- JM 5.

Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6.

Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7.

Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8.

File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9.

Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10.

Date on which file goes to the A.R.

11.

Date of dispatch of Order. *