Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

Imroz Khan Mohiyoddin Khan Nanded vs Income-tax Officer, Ward - 3(2), Nanded

Case NumberITA 1667/PUN/2017
Date of Filing3 Jul 2017
Case TypeIncome Tax Appeal|ITA
Last Hearing--
State--
City--
Year of Filing2017

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Imroz Khan Mohiyoddin Khan Nanded
Respondent
  • Income-tax Officer, Ward - 3(2), Nanded

Case Summary

Imroz Khan Mohiyoddin Khan Nanded vs Income-tax Officer, Ward - 3(2), Nanded (Case No. ITA 1667/PUN/2017) is listed in the Income Tax, filed on 3 Jul 2017. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S.

SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1667/PUN/2017 िनधारण वष / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Imroz Khan Mohiyoddin Khan, House No.1847, Hatai Pura, Kandhar, Taluka Kandhar, Dist.

Nanded PAN : BAXPK0376H Vs.

ITO, Ward-3(2), Nanded (Appellant) (Respondent) आदेश / ORDER PER R.S.SYAL, VP : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-1, Aurangabad on 20-03-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2009-10.

2.

I have heard the ld.

DR and perused the relevant material on record.

There is no appearance from the side of the assessee.

It is seen that the AO has passed the order ex-parte qua the assessee and the ld.

CIT(A) passed the impugned order without obtaining remand report from the AO.

In view Appellant by None Respondent by Shri Rajesh Gawali Date of hearing 03-12-2018 Date of pronouncement 04-12-2018 ITA No.1667/PUN/2017 Imroz Khan Mohiyoddin Khan 2 of the foregoing facts, I am of the considered opinion that the ends of justice would meet adequately if the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is restored to the file of AO.

I order accordingly and direct the AO to make the assessment afresh after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

It is made clear that in such fresh proceedings, the assessee will be at liberty to lead any fresh evidence in support of his case, as desired expedient.

3.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 04th December, 2018.

Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) उपाय उपाय उपाय उपाय/ VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; दनांक Dated : 04th December, 2018 सतीश ITA No.1667/PUN/2017 Imroz Khan Mohiyoddin Khan 3 आदेश आदेश आदेश आदेश क क क क ितिलिप ितिलिप ितिलिप ितिलिप अेिषत अेिषत अेिषत अेिषत / Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. यथ / The Respondent; 3. आयकर आयु(अपील) / The CIT (Appeals)-1, Aurangabad 4. आयकर आयु / The Pr. / The Pr.

CIT-1, Aurangabad 5. िवभागीय ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे “SMC” / DR ‘SMC’, ITAT, Pune; 6. गाड फाईल / Guard file. // True copy // आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date 1.

Draft dictated on 03-12-18 Sr.PS 2.

Draft placed before author 03-12-18 3.

Draft proposed & placed before the second member 4.

Draft discussed/approved by Second Member.

5.

Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS 6.

Kept for pronouncement on 7.

File sent to the Bench Clerk 8.

Date on which file goes to the AR 9.

Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk.

10.

Date of dispatch of Order. *