M/s. Yash Muthiyan Developers, Aurangabad vs Principal Commissioner of Income-tax - 2,
Party Details
- M/s. Yash Muthiyan Developers, Aurangabad
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax - 2,
Case Summary
M/s. Yash Muthiyan Developers, Aurangabad vs Principal Commissioner of Income-tax - 2, (Case No. ITA 625/PUN/2015) is listed in the Income Tax, filed on 5 May 2015. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Orders (1)
- 9MAR 2016judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, पुणे यायपीठ “बी” पुणे म IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE ी आर. के. पांडा, लेखा सद य एवं ी !वकास अव थी, या#यक सद य के सम$ BEFORE SHRI R.K.
PANDA, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.625/PN/2015 #नधा&रण वष& / Assessment Year : 2010-11 M/s.
Yash Muthiyan Developers, H.No.5/25/95, New Vijay Colony, Aurangabad – 431 001 PAN No.AAAFY7698C ………. अपीलाथ / Appellant बनाम v/s The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Aurangabad ………. यथ / Respondent अपीलाथ क ओर से / Assessee by : Withdrawal application Dated 23-11-2015 यथ क ओर से / Revenue by : Shri Avadesh Kumar आदेश / ORDER PER R.K.
PANDA, AM : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 23-03-2015 passed u/s.263 of the I.T.
Act by the Principal CIT-II, Aurangabad.
2.
At the time of hearing an application was filed by the assessee stating that the AO in due course has passed the order u/s.143(3) r.w.s.
263 of the I.T.
Act on 26-05-2015 accepting the contention of the assessee and no further litigation has सुनवाई क तारख / Date of Hearing :09.03.2016 घोषणा क तारख / Date of Pronouncement: 09.03.2016 2 ITA No.625/PN/2015 remained.
Accordingly, a request has been made to permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
3.
After considering the contents of the application and in absence of any objection from the Ld.
Departmental Representative, the request of the assessee seeking permission to withdraw the appeal is accepted.
The appeal filed by the assessee is accordingly dismissed as “withdrawn”.
4.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing itself, i.e. on 09-03-2015.
Sd/- Sd/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) (R.K.
PANDA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे Pune; दनांक Dated : 09th March, 2016. सतीश आदेश क) *#त,ल!प अ-े!षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant 2. यथ / The Respondent 3.
The Pr.CIT-II, Pune 4.
5.
6. e 4.
6.
The CIT-II, Pune $वभागीय 'त'न(ध, आयकर अपीलय अ(धकरण, “बी” पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Pune; गाड- फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // //स या$पत 'त //True C व/र0ठ 'नजी स(चव / Sr.
Private Secretary आयकर अपीलय अ(धकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune