ITO 13(2)(4) MUMBAI vs SUNDIAL CREATIVE MEDIA PVT. LTD. MUMBAI

1 आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “एच” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय श्री महावीर स िंह, उपाध्यक्ष एवुं माननीय श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल ,लेखा दस्य के मक्ष। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील िं./ I.T.A.

No.7200/Mum/2019 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2007-08) ITO-13(2)(4) R.No.146B, 1st Floor Aaykar Bhawan M.K.Road, Mumbai – 400 020 बिाम/ Vs.

M/s Sundial Creative Media Pvt.

Ltd.

C/o Osource India Pvt.

Unit 4, B Wing, 5th Floor Phoenix House, 462 Senapati Bapat Marg, Mumbai – 400 013 स्थायीलेखा िं./ जीआइआर िं./ PAN/GIR No.

AAJCS-3986-K (अपीलाथी/Appellant) : (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee by : Shri R.N.Vasani – Ld.

AR Revenue by : Shri Gurbinder Singh-Ld.

DR ुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of Hearing : 21/04/2021 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 03/05/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1.

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year [AY] 2007-08 contest the order of Ld.

Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-21, Mumbai [CIT(A)] dated 30/08/2019 which has deleted the penalty of Rs.11 Lacs u/s 271(1)(c) as levied by Ld.

AO vide penalty order dated 29/01/2019.

2 2.

The Ld.

AR, at the outset, submitted that the quantum of penalty under dispute is below prescribed threshold limit of Rs.50 Lacs and therefore, the revenue’s appeal is not maintainable in terms of latest low tax effect CBDT Circular No.

17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 [F.No.279/Misc.

142/2007-TTJ(Pt.).

DR could not point out any exception to controvert the plea raised by Ld.

AR.

3.

After going through material on record, we find that quantum of penalty under dispute is below threshold monetary limit of Rs.50 Lacs and therefore, the appeal is not maintainable in terms of recently issued low tax effect Circular No.

142/2007-TTJ(Pt.) issued by CBDT. d by CBDT.

This recent circular further enhances the monetary limit fixed in earlier Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11/07/2018 issued by CBDT as amended on 20/08/2018.

In view of the same, the appeal is not maintainable.

4.

In view of the foregoing, the appeal stand dismissed.

However, a liberty is given to revenue to seek recall of the appeal, if at a later stage, it is found that the matter is covered by any exceptions provided in any of the circular or in case the tax effect in the appeal exceeds the prescribed monetary limit.

5.

Resultantly, the appeal stands dismissed.

Order pronounced on 3rd May, 2021.

Sd/- Sd/- (Mahavir Singh) (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) उपाध्यक्ष / Vice President लेखा दस्य / Accountant Member मुिंबई Mumbai; सदनािंक Dated : 03.05.2021 Sr.PS, Jaisy Varghese 3 आदेशकीप्रधिधलधपअग्रेधर्ि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथी/ The Appellant 2. प्रत्यथी/ The Respondent 3. आयकरआयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A) 4. आयकरआयुक्त/ CIT– concerned 5. सवभागीयप्रसतसनसध, आयकरअपीलीयअसधकरण, मुिंबई/ DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गार्डफाईल / Guard File आदेशाि सार/ BY ORDER, उप/सहायक पुंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण, मुिंबई / ITAT, Mumbai.