Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

MR. SURESH CHANCHALDAS ASRANI MUMBAI vs ACIT 22(2) MUMBAI

Case NumberITA 3571/MUM/2019
Date of Filing24 May 2019
Case TypeIncome Tax Appeal|ITA
Last Hearing--
State--
City--
Year of Filing2019

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MR. SURESH CHANCHALDAS ASRANI MUMBAI
Respondent
  • ACIT 22(2) MUMBAI

Case Summary

MR. SURESH CHANCHALDAS ASRANI MUMBAI vs ACIT 22(2) MUMBAI (Case No. ITA 3571/MUM/2019) is listed in the Income Tax, filed on 24 May 2019. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI M BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.3571/Mum/2019 (A.Y: 2011-12) Mr.

Suresh Chanchaldas Asrani, C- 4, Ganga Estate, Atur Park, Chembur, Mumbai – 400071.

Vs.

ACIT 22(2) Piramal Chambers, Lalbaugh, Mumbai – 400012. थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AADPA3201G Appellant ..

Respondent Appellant by : Shri Tejas Sodha, AR Respondent by : Shri T.S.

Khalsa, DR Date of Hearing 19.07.2021 Date of Pronouncement 19.07.2021 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 25, Mumbai, dated 12.04.2017 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2.

At the time hearing, the Ld.

AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee is intend to settle the tax litigation by opting for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ (VSVS2020) and filed an application in Form No.

1 & 2 ITA No.

3571/Mum/2019 Mr.

Suresh Chanchaldas Asrani, Mumbai. - 2 - under VSVS Rules 2020.

Contra, the Ld.

DR has no objections.

3.

We heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record.

Since the assessee has opted for ‘Vivaad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ and received Form-3 from the income tax department as envisaged by the Ld.AR.

We are of the view that, no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn and the assessee is given liberty to move an application u/s 254(2) of the Act to recall the present order as per provisions of Law.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 19.07.2021.

Sd/- Sd/- (M BALAGANESH) (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Dated 19.07.2021 KRK, PS ITA No.

Suresh Chanchaldas Asrani, Mumbai. - 3 - आदेश क  त ल प अे षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant 2. यथ / The Respondent.

3. ondent.

3. संबंधत आयकर आयु त / The CIT(A) 4. आयकर आयु त(अपील) / Concerned CIT 5. "वभागीय &त&नध, आयकर अपील)य अधकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गाड. फाईल/ Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, सया"पत &त //True Copy// 1. ( Asst.

Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai