Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax -23(2) Mumbai vs M/s KTC Co Mumbai
Party Details
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax -23(2) Mumbai
- M/s KTC Co Mumbai
Case Summary
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax -23(2) Mumbai vs M/s KTC Co Mumbai (Case No. ITA 2703/MUM/2019) is listed in the Income Tax, filed on 1 May 2019. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Orders (1)
- 26MAR 2021judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
आमकय अऩीरीम अधधकयण भ ुंफई ऩीठ “एस एभ सी”, भ ुंफई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI श्री विकास अिस्थी, न्मायमक सदस्म के सभक्ष BEFORE VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आअसुं.
2703/भ ुं/2019 (यन.ि.
2007-08) ITA NO.2703/MUM/2019 (A.Y.2007-08) Asst.
Commissioner of Income Tax – 23(2), 1st floor, Room no.
114, Matru Mandir, Tardeo Road, Mumbai 400 007. ...... अऩीराथी /Appellant फनाभ Vs.
M/s.
KTC Co.
GE 3040, Bharat Diamond Bourse, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai - 400 051.
PAN : AAGFK4725L ..... प्रयििादी/Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra स निाई की यिधथ/ Date of hearing : 31/12/2020 घोषणा की यिधथ/ Date of pronouncement : 26/03/2021 आदेश/ ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, J.M: This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-33, Mumbai (in short ‘the CIT(A)’) dated 07/02/2019 for the assessment year 2007-08.
2.
Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra representing the Department submitted that the assessee is engaged in diamond business.
On the basis of information received from DGIT(Invn.), Mumbai that the assessee has indulged in obtaining accommodation 2 ITA NO.2703/MUM/2019 (A.Y.2007-08) entries to the tune of Rs.89,36,609/- during the period relevant to assessment year under appeal, the assessment was reopened.
The assessee has taken the benefit of accommodation entries from M/s.
Mohit International, a company controlled by Praveen Kumar Jain, a declared hawala operator.
The assessee failed to produce documents to substantiate genuineness of the transactions.
The Assessing Officer made addition of 12.5% of non-genuine transactions.
The assessee carried the issue in first appeal before the CIT(A), who has reduced the addition to 8% of total bogus purchases.
The ld.
Departmental Representative submitted that the Assessing Officer has been quite considerate in making the addition @ 12.5% of bogus purchases. purchases.
The addition was made by the Assessing Officer in accordance with the judgment of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case Bholanath Polyfab Pvt.
Ltd., 40 Taxman 494.
Departmental Representative prayed for reversing the findings of CIT(A) and sustaining the addition made in assessment order.
3.
Submissions made by ld.
Departmental Representative heard, orders of authorities below examined.
The Revenue in appeal has raised solitary ground assailing the findings of CIT(A) in restricting the addition on account of bogus purchases to 8% of such purchases.
The assessee has allegedly obtained accommodation entries amounting to Rs.89,36,609/- from M/s.
Mohit International.
During assessment proceedings, the assessee produced ledger accounts, invoices, copy of bank statements reflecting payments made, etc.
However, the assessee neither produced the supplier nor any confirmation from the suppliers.
Further, the assessee failed to discharge is onus in proving trail of goods.
The profit element embedded in such like transactions has to be brought to tax.
The Assessing Officer made addition of Rs.11,17,076/- by estimating GP on bogus transactions @ 12.5%.
In first appeal, the CIT(A) after taking cognizance of G.P ratio declared by the assessee at 5.36% restricted the addition to 8% of the bogus purchases.
In my considered opinion, keeping in view the business of assessee GP estimated by the Assessing 3 ITA NO.2703/MUM/2019 (A.Y.2007-08) Officer is on higher side.
I find no infirmity in the impugned order, hence, the same is upheld and the appeal of Revenue is dismissed being devoid of merit.
4.
In the result, appeal by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on Friday the 26th day of March, 2021.
Sd/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) न्मायमक सदस्म/JUDICIAL MEMBER भ ुंफई/ Mumbai, ददनाुंक/Dated 26/03/2021 Vm, Sr.
PS (O/S) प्रयिलरवऩ अग्रेवषिCopy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अऩीराथी/The Appellant , 2. प्रयििादी/ The Respondent.
3. ondent.
3. आमकय आम क्ि(अ)/ The CIT(A)- 4. आमकय आम क्ि CIT 5. विबागीम प्रयियनधध, आम.अऩी.अधध., भ फुंई/DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गार्ड पाइर/Guard file.
BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Dy./Asstt.
Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai