PWT PROJECTS LTD MUMBAI vs ADDL CIT SP RG 32 MUMBAI

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "L" Bench, Mumbai Before Shri R.S.

Syal, Accountant Member and Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Judicial Member ITA No.

5761 to 5765/Mum/2011 (Assessment Year: 1992-93, 1995-96, 1996-97 1993-94 &1994-95) M/s.

PWT Projects Ltd.

DDIT (IT) - 2(1) Clearwater Court, Vastern Road Mumbai Reading RGI 8DB Vs.

PAN - AACCP 4051 F Appellant Respondent ITA No.

5766 & 5776/Mum/2011 (Assessment Year: 1997-98 & 1998-99) M/s.

Addl.

CIT, Special Range 32 Clearwater Court, Vastern Road Mumbai Reading RGI 8DB Vs.

PAN - AACCP 4051 F Appellant Respondent Appellant by: None Respondent by: Ms.

Neerja Pradhan Date of Hearing: 05.11.2012 Date of Pronouncement: 07.11.2012 O R D E R Per Bench These appeals are filed by the assessee on 12.08.2011 against separate orders passed by the Deputy Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) and Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai.

2.

These appeals were fixed for hearing on 05.07.2012 but adjourned to 05.11.2012 at the request of the assessee for which notice was issued to the assessee by RPAD on 11.07.2012 at the address as mentioned by the assessee against Item No.

10 of Form 36.

However, on the date of hearing, when this appeal was called upon for hearing, no one appeared on behalf ITA No.

5761/Mum/2011 M/s.

2 of the assessee.

There is also no application or request for adjournment.

It therefore appears to us that the assessee is not serious about pursing these appeals.

Hence following the decision of the Tribunal in the case of CIT vs.

Multiplan India (P) Ltd., reported in 38 ITD 320 (Del), as also the decision of the Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs.

CWT, reported in 223 ITR 480 (MP), and further the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court dated 17.09.2010 in the case of M/s.

Chemipol vs.

Union of India in Central Excise Appeal No.

62 of 2009, we dismiss these appeals as unadmitted for want of prosecution by the assessee. assessee.

In the result all the appeals are dismissed in limine.

Order pronounced in the open court on 07th November, 2012.

Sd/- Sd/- (Vijay Pal Rao) (R.S.

Syal) Judicial Member Accountant Member Mumbai, Dated: 7th November, 2012 Copy to: 1.

The Appellant 2.

The Respondent 3.

The CIT(A) – 11, Mumbai 4.

The CIT– DIT (IT) II, Mumbai City 5.

The DR, “L” Bench, ITAT, Mumbai By Order //True Copy// Assistant Registrar ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai n.p.