COLUMBIA GLOBAL CENTER IN INDIA MUMBAI vs DIT (E) MUMBAI
Party Details
- COLUMBIA GLOBAL CENTER IN INDIA MUMBAI
- DIT (E) MUMBAI
Case Summary
COLUMBIA GLOBAL CENTER IN INDIA MUMBAI vs DIT (E) MUMBAI (Case No. ITA 1448/MUM/2011) is listed in the Income Tax, filed on 18 Feb 2011. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Orders (1)
- 6JUN 2012judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “C”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL (J.M.) AND SHRI N.K.
BILLAIYA (A.M.) ITA No.
1448/Mum/2011 Columbia Global Center in India, 11th floor, Express Towers, Nariman Point, Mumbai.
400 021.
PAN : AADCC8901G Vs.
Director of Income-Tax (Exemption), 6th floor, Piramal Chambers, Parel, Mumbai- 400 021. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Withdrawal letter dtd.
3.5.12 Revenue by : Aatiq Ahmed Date of hearing 30.5.2012 Date of pronouncement 06-06-2012 O R D E R PER DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL, J.M.
This appeal preferred by the assessee is directed against the order dated 22.12.2010 passed by the Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) r.w.s.
12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) denying the registration of the assessee u/s 12A of the Act.
2.
At the time of hearing, the assessee vide letter dtd.
3-5-2012 inter alia submitted as under (para 2 & 3):- “The Appellant filed a fresh application for registration under section 12A of the ITA before the DIT(E) on March 15, 2011.
The DIT(E) granted a tax registration under section 12A of the ITA on September 19, 2011 .............
In light of the same, the captioned Appeal would not be deemed ITA No.
1448/MUM/2011 2 necessary and relevant and therefore the Appellant has decided not to pursue the aforesaid appeal.............”.
3.
The ld.
D.R. did not object the same.
4.
After hearing the ld.
D.R. and perusing the material available on record and in absence of any other supporting material placed on record by the assessee, the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and accordingly we dismiss the assessee’s appeal for non- prosecution.
5.
In the result, the assessee’s appeal stands dismissed being withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 6th June, 2012.
Sd/- (N.K.
BILLAIYA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sd/- (DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Dated 6th June, 2012.
RK Copy to: 1.
The Appellant 2.
The Respondent 3. pondent 3.
The DIT (Exemption, Mumbai 4.
ITO (E) – (I)(1), Mumbai 5.
Departmental Representative, Bench ‘B’, Mumbai //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSTT.