Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

ATHARVA CONSTRUCTION CO. MUMBAI vs PR. CIT-29 MUMBAI

Case NumberITA 5099/MUM/2015
Date of Filing21 Oct 2015
Case TypeIncome Tax Appeal|ITA
Last Hearing--
State--
City--
Year of Filing2015

Party Details

Petitioner
  • ATHARVA CONSTRUCTION CO. MUMBAI
Respondent
  • PR. CIT-29 MUMBAI

Case Summary

ATHARVA CONSTRUCTION CO. MUMBAI vs PR. CIT-29 MUMBAI (Case No. ITA 5099/MUM/2015) is listed in the Income Tax, filed on 21 Oct 2015. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “A”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.S.PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAMLAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.

5099/Mum/2015 (Assessment Year 2010-11) M/s.

Atharva Construction Co., (Partner- Mr.

Balkrishna Shingar), 101, Shree Shingar Apartment, Ashwini Compound, Opp.

Deshmukh Garden, M.P.Road, Mulund East, Mumbai 400 081 PAN:AANFA 3584G ......

Appellant Vs.

The Principal CIT-29, 3rd Floor, C-10, Pratyaksh Kar Bhavan, BKC, Mumbai 400051 ....

Respondent Appellant by : Ms.

Neelam Ganatra Respondent by : Shri A.Ramachandran Date of hearing : 21/09/2016 Date of pronouncement : 23/09/2016 ORDER PER G.S.PANNU,A.M: The captioned appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to assessment year 2010-11 is directed against an order passed by Pr.CIT- 29 Mumbai dated 26/02/2015 which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 11/03/2013.

2 ITA No.

5099/Mum/2015 (Assessment Year 2010-11) 2.

In this case, at the time of hearing, the Ld.

Representative for the assessee submitted that in the assessment finalized by the Assessing Officer, consequent to the impugned order of the Commissioner, the plea of the assessee has been accepted.

For this reason, it is submitted that the said appeal proceedings have become infructuous and is withdrawn.

3.

The Ld.

Departmental Representative has not contested the stand of the assessee .

4.

Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous.

Order pronounced in the open court on 23/09/2016 Sd/- Sd/- (RAMLAL NEGI) (G.S.

PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOCUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Dated 23/09/2016 Vm, Sr.

PS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1.

The Appellant , 2.

The Respondent.

The CIT(A)- 4.

CIT 5.

DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6.

Guard file.

BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Dy./Asstt.

Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai