FOCUS COMTRADE P. LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS SOLAR GTRADELINKS P. LTD) MUMBAI vs ITO 2(3)2 MUMBAI
Party Details
- FOCUS COMTRADE P. LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS SOLAR GTRADELINKS P. LTD) MUMBAI
- ITO 2(3)2 MUMBAI
Case Summary
FOCUS COMTRADE P. LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS SOLAR GTRADELINKS P. LTD) MUMBAI vs ITO 2(3)2 MUMBAI (Case No. ITA 7327/MUM/2010) is listed in the Income Tax, filed on 26 Oct 2010. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (1)
- 6JUL 2012judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मंुबई Ûयायपीठ ‘एफ’ मंुबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F ” BENCH, MUMBAI सवर्Įी आर.एस. èयाल, ले.स. एवं Įी अिमत शुक्ला, Ûया.स. के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, AM & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.7327/Mum/2010 (िनधार्रण वषर् / Assessment Year :2005-2006) Focus Comtrade P.
Ltd.(Formerly known as Solar Gtradelinks P.
Ltd.), Forbes Bldg, 3rd Floor, Charanjit Singh Rai Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 001.
Vs.
ITO 2(3)2, Mumbai-400 020. èथायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN No.
AADCS 1570 P (अपीलाथीर् /Appellant) : (प्र×यथीर् / Respondent) अपीलाथीर् ओर से / Appellant by : None प्र×यथीर् की ओर से/Respondent by : Mr.
M.
Rajan सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 3rd July, 2012 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 6th July, 2012 आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M.) : This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 3-9-2010, passed by the CIT(A)-6, Mumbai for the quantum of assessment passed under Section 143(3) for the assessment year 2005-2006.
2.
The appeal was fixed for hearing on 9th May, 2012.
Despite issue of notice of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee.
It appears that the assessee is not interested in the prosecution of the ITA No : 7327/m/10 2 case.
We find that the ratio emanating from the decision rendered by Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs.
Commissioner of Wealth Tax 223 ITR 480 and the Tribunal decision in CIT Vs.
Multiplan India Limited 38 ITD 320 is that the appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Hence, following the precedent, we dismiss this appeal for non-prosecution in limine.
3.
However, if the assessee through proper application can satisfy the Tribunal for such non appearance on the date of hearing, the Tribunal may at its discretion recall this order.
4.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. पिरणामतः िनधार्िरती की अपील खािरज की जाती है Order pronounced in the open court on 6th July, 2012 . ly, 2012 . आदेश की धोषणा खुले Ûयायालय मɅ िदनांकः 6th July, 2012 को की गई । (आर.एस. èयाल) ( अिमत शुक्ला ) ( R.S.SYAL) (AMIT SHUKLA) लेखा सदèय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ûयाियक सदèय/JUDICIAL MEMBER मंुबई Mumbai; िदनांक Dated 06 / July /2012 प्र.कु.िम/pkm.िन.स./PS ITA No : 7327/m/10 3 आदेश की प्रितिलिप अग्रेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथीर् / The Appellant 2. प्र×यथीर् / The Respondent.
3. आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 4. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 5. िवभागीय प्रितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मंुबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. गाडर् फाईल / Guard file. स×यािपत प्रित //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.
Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मंुबई / ITAT, Mumbai