Meta Pixel
CNR: HBHC010131502022
DISPOSED

Anu Durga Prasad Gadala vs The State of Telangana

Case NumberCRLP 1816/2022
Date of Filing23 Feb 2022
Case TypeCRLP
Last Hearing21 Mar 2022
State--
City--
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Anu Durga Prasad Gadala
Respondent
  • The State of Telangana

Case Summary

Anu Durga Prasad Gadala filed Case No. CRLP 1816/2022 in the High Court for State of Telangana on 23 Feb 2022 against The State of Telangana. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 21 Mar 2022. 6 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 21MAR 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (6)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Anu Durga Prasad Gadala, S/o Sai Satyanarayana, Occ.

Pvt.

Employee, R/o 3-259/5, Gangaraju Nagar, Road No.3, Valasapakala, Kakinada, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT.

JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1816 OF 2022 ..,PETITIONER/ACCUSED.l Between: AND of 1.

The State of Telangana, Through Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2.

Lohitha Thandra D/o.

Venkateshwarlu Thandra, aged 28 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o.

Flat No.305, SRK Residency, Street No.2, Gachibowli, Senlrngampally.

Ranga Reddy District. ...PROPOSED RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT (As per Court Order dated 08.03.2022 in l.A.No.1 oi 2022 in Crl.P.No.l816 2022 Respondent No.2 impeded) Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Anticipatory Bail to accused no.1 in the eventbf his arrest by the police in connection with FIR No.171 of 2022 on the file of SHO, Gachibowli PS, Cyberabad.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Smt.

K. lndira Golda, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

The Court made the following: ORDER MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRSTDAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO THE HON,BLE DT.

JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER IMI TI No. f20 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 wouid submit that the cause in the criminal petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.

ASSIST;fi+-HHS+Hii //rRUE COPY/I #^^z{ SECTION OFFICER to'',.

CER to'',. ,n" Xlll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate' Kukatpally at Prashanth Nagar' Cvberabad. , i#3lJti"; House officer, Gachibowli Police Slation' Cvberabad 5. o";-Ca; s.t. x. tnoit" Golda, Advocate [OPUCI 4 Two CCs to the P,bl; F;;;;"''ii.'gh Coltt for ine state of Telansana at Hvderabad. [OUT] 5.

Two CD CoPies 6.

One SPare CoPY gbr \ \'-k* HIGH COURT DATED: 2110312022 *,; ! ' Afr.c f,oo [8 AIB 2in' _-(.. i ORDER CRL.P.No.1816 of 2022 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS r.\9* I \ l9