Potta Bikshapathi vs The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation and 2 others
Party Details
- Potta Bikshapathi
- The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation and 2 others
- The Regional Manager
- The Depot Manager
Case Summary
Potta Bikshapathi filed Case No. WP 21310/2022 in the High Court for State of Telangana on 25 Apr 2022 against The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation and 2 others and The Regional Manager. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 5 Dec 2022. 4 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 5DEC 2022Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (4)
- 3MAR 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 3
- 5DEC 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 2
- 5DEC 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
[ 3302 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF IVIARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SR!
JUSTICE K.
SARATH |.A.NO.1 0F 2023 IN Between: AND Business, R/o.
H.No. ...PETITIONER 1.
The Telangana state Road rransport_corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, Musheerabad, T.S.' ?.
The Regional lr/anagg1, TSRTC, Nalgonda Region, Nalgonda District, T.S.
3.
The.Depot.Managel, Yadagirigutta Bus Depot,-Yadadri-Bhongir Distri'ct - (earlier Nalgonda)' T's' 'i: . ..RE'',NDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Add the sentence i.e. "if penalty was already recovered from the petitioner the same should be refunded to the petitioner" to the last operative para of the order by amending the order dated 511212022 in W.P.
No.21310t2022 This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon reading the order dated 05.12..2022 in W.P.No.21310 of 2022 and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.
Venkateswar Rao, Counsel for the petitioner and of Sri Gaddam Srinivas, Standing Counsel on behalf of the Respondents, the Court made the following: ORDER "Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical matters this Gourt passed orders in W.P.No.28032 of 2021 dated 22.12.2022 and directed the respondents therein that 'if the penalty was already recovered from the petitiongr, the same should be refunded to the petitioner' and requested to add the said words in the finat order passed by this Court in fo_tla Bikshapathi, S/o.
Kattaiah, Aged about 46 years 3-8 0, Koth u ld p u ra m, N a ra ya n a p u ratr, trt iigo n-d i ditiiJi W'P'No'21310 of 2022 on 05.12.2022 in the operative portion i.e.; last line of ln view of the same' l.A. is atlowed and the corrigendum issued to the orders passed in w.p.No.21310 of 2022 on 05.12.2022 i.e. .2022 i.e., add the words at last line of Para No.4 after'payment of penalty, as foltows: "if the penalty.was arready recovered from the petitioner, the same should be refunded to the petitioner,, //TRUE COPY// SD/- P.
PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTAryT REGISTRAR (# SECTION OFFICER To, 1.
The Transport Corporation, Bus 2.
4.
5.
6.
MBC Bha The The One One n T.S.
Two Advocate [OPUC] GJPAt-- t: li :r f , :l' HIGH COURT DATED: 03/0312023 'ittE SI,1 Y .! [4 APi] 2[2X t-t ., \-! ' ' t:)" ORDER I.A.NO.1 0F 2023 IN NO: 21310 OF 2022 ALLOWING THE I.A.
KE- 4a*