G.Balakistaiah vs The State of Telangana

[ 3302 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.

SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 6021 0F 2022 Between: 1 2 G.Balakistaiah, S/o.G.Basappa: Aged about 3g years, Occu.

Agriculture, RJo.

H.No.4-'105, Bhuneed Vilatl;, Maidur wiioll,'ruiiayanpet Oiitrict, birt"-oi Telangana Suthari Hanmanthu, S/o.suthari Hanmanna, Aged about 38 years, Occu. fglqultqe, Rl/o H.No.t-99, Bhuneed Viilage, liladdui Mandarl ttriiv",ii"i District, State of Telangana .S.rinivas, _S/o.

Hanmanthu, A-g-ed. gbo-uJ 31 years, Occu.

Agricu.lture, R/o. .No.5-4211, Bhuneed Viilage, Maddur l\/anda[, Narbyanpet Oistrict, Siite of elangana 4.

Gundla.

Kadi Rai_u, S/o. pap, anna,- fged about 3.1 years, Occu.

Agriculture, Rl/o.

H No.1-80, Bhuneed Vittage, Ma-ddur t\ilandat.

NarayanpeibisFi;i strt,i of Telangana 5.

N.Kesahvulu, S/o.

N.Balappa,-fg9d about 29 years, Occu.

Agriculture, R/o.

H.No.2-55, Bhuneed Village, tVa-ddur l\rlandat,'Narayanpet Diitrict, ai;te ;i Telangana 6.

Shanambhavi rhirumalesh Goud, S/o. pentanna Goud, Aqed about 27 vears.

Occu.

H.No.5/.15, Bhuneed Villagei lv"ddr; - fr,f i"Oaf , Narayanpet District, State of Telangana 7.

Gundlakadi Kranthi Kum_ar,_ S/o.

Samuel, Aged about 36 years, Occu.

4griculture, R/o.

H.No.5-5, Bhuneed Viilage, "Maddur l\/andat] N#y;;p;i District, State of Telangana B.

K. lsmail, S/o.

Abdul Shaeb, Aged about 32 years, Occu.

H.No.2-48, Bhuneed Viilage, N/addur [,4andat,'Narayanpet DtiiriCt, Stit"'of Telangana 9.

Ediga Shiva_Ramulu, S/o- _ Ramachandraiah, Aged about 30 years, Occu.

Bhuneed Viltage, IVaddur Mandil, Narayanpel 6"ir"t, Sirte of Telangana 10.B.Sudhakar Reddy, S/o.

Padma Reddy, Aqed about 3g vears.

Occrr Agriculture, R/o.

H.No.4-28, Bhuneed Viliage,-Maddur N/andal Narayanpet District, State of Telangana 1 '1 .

Thirupathi Reddy, S/o. eddy, S/o.

Srinivas Reddy, Aged about 20 years, Occu.

Ag_riculture, Rl/o.

Bhuneed Village. tvaddui Mandal, Narayanpet bistrict, State of Telangana 3.N H T I l2.Thirupathi Reddy, S/o_. -Venkat Reddy, Aged ab rut 32 years, Occu.

Agriculture, R/o H.No.2-32, Bhuneed Vitiagel Madc r r tvlandai, ttaiayanpet District, State of Telargana 13 K Rafi, S/o. lVlahabub, Aged about 28 years, Occu. lr, rriculture, Fl/o.

H.No.2_ 58, Bhuneed Village, Ir4addur lrrlandal, Narayanpet Dist ict, State of Telangana 1 4 G.Raju, ^S/o, Chandrappa, Aged about 37 years, ( ccu.

H.No.5-2, Bhuneed Vitlage, IVaddur f\,4andal, Naraye rpet DEtrict, State of Telangana 15 th.Anjaneyulu, S/o.

Ch.Chandrappa, Aged about 26 1,t ars, Occu.

Bhuneed Village, A/addur Mandat,.

Narayairl et District, "Staie oi Telangana ...PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Telangana, Rgp. by its Chief Secre; ry and Special Chief Secretary to the Government B.R.K.Bhavan, Saifabad iyderabad The District Collector, Narayanpet District At Narayanp t t The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narayanpet Division. ,\ Narayanpet ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articie 226 a'f the constitution of in J a pi-aying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction mort: rarticularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings d a ed 0610912021 in file No.B/1 680/2020 passed by the 3rd Respondent i.e.

Rever re Divisional officer, Narayanpet as illegal is arbitrary, illegal and without proper,r rplication of mind and done with a malafide inlention and consequen y direct the Fl .spondent No..1 and 2 to re-consider the objections submitted by the petitioners z r c consider proposing Bhuneed village as new Revenue tVlandal. tVlandal. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the c r rumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m: r be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to reconsider the recommendation ;ubmitted by the 3d 2 3 Respondent dated 06/09/2021 and propose Bhuneed village as new Revenue lvlandal, pending disposal of WP No l2O22.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.

PRAVEEN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SA IATH WRIT PETITION No.6O21 of 2022 ORDER: Learned Counsel appearing for tL e petitioners submits that no further orders a-re neco:sary in this matter and the cause in the Writ Petilitn does rrot survivc and thereby, the Writ Petition has become infructuous 2 Recording the aforementioned sut mission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs 3.

As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Pet tions, if any pending in this petition, shali stand closec \T I l, 1 SD/.

A.

JAYASREE STANT REGISTRAR ; SECTION OFFICER Itate of Telangana at To //TRUE COPY// One CC to SRI N.

PRAVEEN REDDY' Advocate\dPu ll 1 2.

Two CCs to GP for Revenqe' High Court for the Hyderabad. [OUT] 3.

Two CD CoPies MP GJP .d- {IGH COUR+ DATE D:1511012025 ;r^iF t c'l 13 r) ?t"e: ORDER WP.Nc .6021 of 2022 DISMISSING THE Vl]RIT PETITION AS II.IFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS rlf 2c) * \1f \-b \ r-\/ 6 I i I I !

1