CH.Vanaja vs The State Telangana

[ 32ee ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.

VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO:799 OF 2022 Between: 1.

CH.Vanaja, W/o Ch.Rajalingam, Aged aboul 42 years, Occ ; Housewife, RJo H.

No.1 -9-338, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad.

2 Gourisetty Venkateshwarlu, S/o Late G.Mallaiah, Aged about 67 years, Occ; Business, R/o H No.1-1 Velair Village, Dha rmasagarl\,4andal, Hanumakonda District (Warangal Dist). .....PETITIONERS AND 1.

The State Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Stamps and Registration Dept, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2.

The Commrssioner and lnspector General, Stamps and Reglstration Depadment, M.

J Road, HYderabad.

3.

The Drstrict Collector, Sanga Reddy District at Sanga Reddy.

4.

The District Registrar, SangaReddy District at Sangareddy.

5.

The Sub Registrar-|, Ameenpur Village, Medak District 6 The Hyderabad l/etropolrtan Development Authority, Rep. by its Commissioner, Tarnaka, Hyderabad.

7.

The Tahsildhar, Sanga Reddy Mandal Sanga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 2 to 5 as illegal, arbitrary in including the property bearing Plot Nos.

1 -l 85 12 in Sy No.

1132 of Ameenpur Village and Mandal, Sanga Reddy District from the prohibition properties list under section 224 of the registration Act, vrr.lzrtive ,tf Article 300-4 of Constitution o' lnlia on the ground that mere pending a ;Lrit in connect on with the survey No.1 132 lA No.45212017 in 0.S No. in 0.S No.7212017 : no status quo order against the petition lr as the same is not bindrng upon lre pet tioners which is illegal and arl:i'rary ccnseqJentiy, direct the 3rd resp,rrdent to delete the prohibitory list th? allove sublect property of the petittoners l.A.NO:1 OF 2022 Petition UnCei' Section 151 CPC praying that in the c roumstances stated in the affrdavit filed in support of the petition, the High C:)urt may be pleased pleased to direc: the respondent No.

6 to consider the ao:)lication dated 14-.10- 2021 to grant permlssion for construction of residential bJilding consisting of 1 Stilt t 5 Upper F.locr in Plot No.'1 1 and 12 in survey No 1 r 32 Arreenpur l\,4andal and lvledak drst'ict by suspending the short fall notice 11.i5.12.2021 without reference to the tro.lbited T st. oending disposal of the writ r)€,tition Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI RAMPRASAD PATHIpAKA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 & 7 : Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : SRI V.NARASTMHAGOUD.

SC FOR HMDA The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.799 of 2022 ORDER: Constitution of lnc er, is filcc1 seel<ing tl-re lollowing relicf: " . ..plecLsed to qrent an appropiate Wit order or drection nLore parlicularLg one it Lhe ttatttre of Wrtt. of marv)curtrts to dectore. the action of the respondents 2 to 5 cts illegol arbitrory n includirtg the propefty berting Plot Nos.

1 l, 85 and 12 irL S.r7.

JVo.

1132 o.f Ameenpur Vtllrtge ulrd MarLdal, Satqa Reddy Distict from the proltibitiott properties ltst under se-ctiort 22A of the relJistration Acl uiola.true oJ' Article 300 A of Constitution of hrdia on the ground tl'Lat tnere pendiq a suit in connection uith the suntey No l132 t.A.No.452/2017 in O.S.No.72/2017 is no .slcrlr.r-s cluo order agctinst the petitioner as fhe sorrte i-s rrot birclnrg ullott ttte petltioners tuhiclt is ille:gctl uttd arl.titrary ccntsequen(ly direct the 3'd responclent to tlelete tlte pro|riltit. ro|riltit.ory tist the altoue subject propeft.g of the petitlo ne rs cnrcl ptLs s... " Star-rding Counsel appcaring for respondent No-6.

Hearcl leamed counsel appearing for the pctitioners and iearned Assistant Government Pleader for Rcvcnlte, appearing for respondent Nos.

1 to 5 and 7 and learned Tlris Writ Petition, undcr Article 226 of the ['age 2 o1-2 3.

Wht:Lt the lnaLter is taken up for i'rr:aring, lcarned counsel arppearing lbr t1-rc petitioners wouki srubmit that the cause rn tllc presenL \\'rit petition does rLot survive lor adjucircatron .rs thc propcrt\ qllcstion h i.s bccn remo\.ed III from thc list ol prohibited propcrtics.

I-lenr::. sccks to close Lhe u'rit petr,.ion as iltfructuoLrs same 5.

Recording the submissions made b_i- arll the learncd counsel this; u'rit pr:tition is closecl as in[rl_r<;tuous.

There sha1l be ll,l ot-ders as to costs 4.

Leamcrl Assistant Govcrrtrnent Pleader fcr Revenue. for respondent Nos.l to and 7 anc{ lcarned Standing Counsel appearilrg for- rcspondent No.b also takes no objcctton for the Asa sr:quel, miscclianeous pctitior-rs, I anv, pending, l ! shall stand closed qo f;d/.B.REKHA RANI IJISTANT REGI //TRUE COPY// ^.

Ap SECTION OFFICER To SA PMK 1.

Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the Stirt': of Telangana at Hvderabad [OUT] z.

O'ne CC to SRI RAI/PRASAD PATHIPAKA, Advocate C'PUC] 5 o;; aa io Spir V.Np.nnslN/HA GouD, sc FoR HMDr\, Advocate (oPUC) 4.

Two CD Copies HIGH COUR]I DATED:2610812025 ORDER WP.No.799 of 2022 .: S 1.,, i'{: t:'f, l: 1,.,,:)- ,)., 4, \r :,: 1t NIU 2q6 CLOSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. qA- )1 rt n\ a/