Meta Pixel
CNR: HBHC011493632011
DISPOSED

Smt.Bh.Durga Naga Laxmi vs The authorized Officer

Case NumberWA 113/2022
Date of Filing23 Mar 2011
Case TypeWA
Last Hearing--
State--
City--
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Smt Bh Durga Naga Laxmi
Respondent
  • The authorized Officer
  • The Area Manager
  • The Regional Manager

Case Summary

Smt Bh Durga Naga Laxmi filed Case No. WA 113/2022 in the High Court for State of Telangana on 23 Mar 2011 against The authorized Officer and The Area Manager. The case was disposed of. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.

Orders (2)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT APPEAL No.113 of 2022 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma) The present writ appeal is arising out of order dated 21.01.2011 passed in W.P.No.1531 of 2010.

The facts of the case reveal that the writ petitioner came up before this Court by filing a writ petition being aggrieved by order dated 04.12.2009 passed by the Authorised Officer, Life Insurance Corporation Housing Finance Limited forfeiting the amount of Rs.2,16,500/- paid by her towards the sale price of the flat.

While the matter was being heard, learned counsel appearing for Life Insurance Corporation Housing Finance Limited made a proposal to refund the entire amount of Rs.2,16,500/- without interest and the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner accepted the proposal to receive the amount.

In those circumstances, the writ petition was disposed of based upon the consent of the parties to refund the amount of Rs.2,16,500/-.

Now the present writ appeal has been filed by the appellant/writ petitioner and the prayer is that interest and costs be awarded.

In the considered opinion of this Court, as the order passed by the learned Single Judge was a consent order, the question of awarding costs and interest does not arise.

2 Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

There shall be no order as to costs. __________________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ ________________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J 17.02.2022 ES