Vankuduth Bhasker vs The State of Telangana
Party Details
- Vankuduth Bhasker
- The State of Telangana
- The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise
- The Station House Officer
Case Summary
Vankuduth Bhasker filed Case No. WP 24322/2022 in the High Court for State of Telangana on 6 Jun 2022 against The State of Telangana and The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 23 Jun 2022. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 23JUN 2022Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (3)
- 23JUN 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 2
- 23JUN 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 1
- 13JUN 2022orderView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
n HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Between: AND Vankuduth Bhasker, S/o.
Devula, Aged 35 years, Occ.
Private Service, Rt/o.
C-19, Ragadi Thanda, Nellikudur, Mahbubabad District. ...PETITIONER 1.
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 004.
2.
The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Warangal.
3.
The Station House Officer, PS Neckonda, Warangal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not releasing the Car bearing No.
AP20 TB 5378, CHEVROLET TAVERA NE03 seized in Cr.
No.
8212021 of PS Neckonda to the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and violative of articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to decide such petitions for release of vehicles by expressing his authority under the statutory.
WRIT PETITION NO:24322 OF 2022 1 lA NO: 'l oF 2022 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant interim directions directing the respondent No 2 to release the car Ap20 TB 5378, CHEVROLET TAVERA NE03 seized in cr.
82r2o21 to the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl.
C M R VELU Counsel for the Respondent No 1 & 2 : Gp FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No 3 : Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following : ORDER I Ii I i i ; i ! , l i THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.
VTNOD KUMAR Writ Petition No. tition No.24322 of 2O22 ORDER: The main grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ petition is non-acceptance and disposal of the application dt.05;03.2022 filed by him under Section 46 of the TS Excise Act (for short, \he Act).
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 13.06.2022, on the submission being made by the learned counsel for the petit-roner, this Court directed the learned Government pleader for prohibition and Excise to forward a copy of the said application of the petitioner dt.05.03.2022, as filed in the Writ petition, to the concerned authority and the said authority was directed to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner under Section 46 of the Act within one week.
Today. when the matter is taken up, learned Government Pleader has placed before this Court the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Cr.No.346/2022lpElBZ, dt.21.06.2022, whereby the application of the petitioner filed under Section 46 of the Act has been considered and disposed of by the said authority.
4.
Having regard to the sarne, since the 2nd respondent has now passed order on the application filed by the petitioner under Section 46 of the Act vide proceedings in Cr.No.346 12022/pEtB2, ft..2t.06.2022, ( I // l I I { , I \ t i I 2 the grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ petition stands redressed.
However, it is made clear that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, he may avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law 5.
Subject to the above observation, the Writ petition is closed.
No order as to costs.
6 Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.P.PADMANABH ASSISTANT TRAR sEc FFICER // //TRUE COPY// I i To, '1 .
The Principal Secretary, Excise Department' Secretariat' State of Telangana' Hyderabad - 500 004' 2.
The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise' Warangal' 3.
The Station House Officer, PS Neckonda' Warangal District' 4.
One CC to SRl.
C M R VELU Advocate [OPUC] 5. [OPUC] 5.
Two CCs to GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE' High Court for the State of ' i"ringinu at HYderabad [OUT] 6.
Two CCs to GP FOR HOME' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 7.
Two CD CoPies 8.
One SPare CoPY ?
MSL ,c,.
REDDY \ \ ! i I i I i I I I II I I I I II I I iI t Ii I ; t HIGH COURT DATED i 2310612022 ORDER WP.No.
24322 ot 2022 CLosrnlcn t IffiOsTHE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS. e' i ii: s14 16. ililj 2fi22 ,7\ a) C,{, ',)- Cb? t+\\ur-- or\