Meta Pixel
CNR: HBHC010325452022
DISPOSED

Mohd. Hasham Qureshi vs The State of Telangana

Case NumberWP 23730/2022
Date of Filing16 May 2022
Case TypeWP
Last Hearing10 Jun 2022
State--
City--
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Mohd Hasham Qureshi
Respondent
  • The State of Telangana
  • Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corp
  • The Assistant Commissioner
  • Jai Hanuman Welfare Society

Case Summary

Mohd Hasham Qureshi filed Case No. WP 23730/2022 in the High Court for State of Telangana on 16 May 2022 against The State of Telangana and Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corp. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 10 Jun 2022. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 10JUN 2022
    Next Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (3)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY IWO Betwee n: lvohd.

Hasham Qureshi, S/o.

Late Fakheer Mohammed Qureshi.

Aged about 54 years, Occ.

Business, R/o.

H.No.

17-1-130, Rein Bazar, Near lmambada' Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND '1 .

The State of Telangana' Represented by its Principal Secretary (Municipal administration) Stt"tttitt' Seoetariat Buildings Hvderabad' 2.

Greater Hyderabad il"u'ffiipftIri ' *p ov c"ot'nit"lon"t' Lower tank bund' Hyderabad. cle No.7, GHMC, Phool bagh' 3 ;il";;itnt commissioner' Town planning' ctr' Hvderabad ^ r.. c,^^ h., irs secretary Sri Prabhakar Reddy a Jji Hanuman Welfare Society'-Rep bY^ilt,St/"r*r,npura' Hyderaoao " l"i''t"'''z:J-i 19' lmambada' SRT colony roao ri ...RE.'.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the afiidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue u writ' o'Oer or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamu' o""ru'lng *'e inaction "t-"::":::":t"iffiX;;:tltlffi any action on the complaint made by the petitior structions as being illegal and *J.r*"* No'4 for illegal and unauthorized con contrarY to law PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23730 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to forthwith direct the Respondents No.2 & 3 to initiate immediate action on the complaint dated 10-05-2022 made by the Petitioner and refrain the censtructions on the said property made by the Respondent No.4 pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the petitioners: SRl.

MOHAMMED ABDUL eUADEER Counset for the Resoondents:.Gp ron NUflcfpn[eofUN URBAN DEV FSHH,,J::the Respondents No.2 u"d t,"srii.'';;HAM KR,.HNA REDD' sc 9.oy1.", for the Respondents No. ndents No.

4: NON AppEARED I he Court made the following: ORDER lA NO: 1 OF 2022 THE HON'BLE SMT.

JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION No.

2 3730 0F 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction of Respondents 2 and 3 in taking action on the complaint made by the petitioner on 10.05.2022 against the 4s respondent for illegal and unauthorised constructions' 2.

Sri Mohd.

Abdul Quadeer' learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the unofficial respondents are making illegal construction, hence, the petitioner has given a representation dated 1O'05 2O22 to the respondent Corporation to take action against the unofficial respondents He submits that in spite of the same' the respondent authorities have not taken any action and the unofficial respondents are going ahead with the construction activity He submits that the matter came on that daY also' the matter was the resPondent the resPondent affidavit before this up on 19.05 '2022 ' even adjourned for ' sPecific CorPoration' In sPite of officers have taken action nor filed counter- instructlons from the same, neither Learned Standing Counsel for Sri Pasham Krishna ReddY Court the resPondent submits that the corporatlon respondent Corporation will take appropriate action in accordance with law.

4.

Recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel, the Writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Corporation. to consider the representation dated 10.O5.2022 of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on the said representation in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

There shall be no order as to costs.

5.

The miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand closed.

SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR ASSISTANT REGIST RAO //TRUE COPY' ,( To, SECTIONC OFF|cER 1 The principal Sec , Se^cretariat, b;.,;;::'33,0,l#i'i'rlX,,.r#Jinistration) State or reransana ' il::iilIlderabad rvrunrcrpar corp. rep by c( _ Hyderabad.

Hyderabad. issioner, Town planning, ci ; s*ti*h,[fri*- dll+trl*i,,jffi ;:. ffi# -I ; ; *'t**f;i*ffi' il; -'^ il:,"^ffiil ;; trtr \.P HIGH COURT DATED | 1010612022 ORDER WP.No.23t30 of 2022 DISPOSING OF TI WTHOUT COSTS] WRIT PETITON * \sP ( o * o \r\ c it9 f {-- a* a,) A" N: o o o l **v\