Tirumalakonda Nagamani vs State of Telangana, And 2 Others

q HIGH'COURT FOR'THE STATE OF,TELANGANA (Special Original J urisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF IVIARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITIO N NO: 11496 0F 2022 TirumalakondaNagamani,W/oArnakondaSadanandam,Aged34years'Occ'Govt iroi"v"!, o"slgiation'staii- Nrtie, Emplovee . lD'fi5'614' Erstwhile -Local e;ffik;r;;d; zon.-V, nrrotted New_Loial Cadrg.

Bhadradri-lV, Fyo !,1.No.20- i 4tii;ii,il;iriir.rlini, Rbmagundam, peddapalti District, Telangana state.

Betwee n: AND 1 ...PETITIONER 3 State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, (GAD Dept)' Telangana Secretariat, HYderabad' State of Telanqana, Rep by its Principal Secretary' (Public Health and Family Welfare Dept), Telangana Secretariat' HyoeraDao' DirectorofPublicHealthandFamilyWelfareDept,TelanganaState, Hyderabad. .,.RESPONDENTS PetitionUnderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be ;i";;;; i" issue Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus' declaring that the petitionei-is entitled to be allotted to Peddapalli District Multi Zone-l as Staff Nurse unO"t tpout" grounds.and in terms of Telangana Public Employment (Organisat;; -ot loiat Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) orOers ZOi6 rssued Vide G'S'R 820 (E) dated 2S/08i2018 and ;;;;;;.;ii;t-oio"r, uni6|" o.o'ttrt'no'rJq:'..qated'04/08t2021' G o'Ms No 175 iri"i.ir+loazo2'1 and urso:.in1"t" of lpii'alre and 23 of the Appendix to G.o.Ms.No.3'1 z oateo.ooiiitz'oi1 iid'nOn'ionsideration of his preference for ailotment to peddapalti rjiriii.i rr,lrrti 2one-t,'is illegal, arbitrary.and violation of in.i+, "'.Jur Jclnititrtion of lndia and consequ-ently direct the Respondents to allot the petitioner to iirilugrndim trleoicat College, Peddapalli District' tvlulti iond, without insisting in the interest of justice' :1 OF 2022 Petition Under SJction 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ,.. stated ,.., in;:th! ltjurrii ii"Ji.-rrpp"rt ot tne p"iition, i=t',e Hign court mav be pleased to / i I 1 .q grant lnterim Direction to Respondents to consider dated.09/02/2022 for allolment to Ramagundam l/edical District, Ivlulti Zone-l.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.RAMESH BURA .-a -...

Counsel for the Riilptindent No.1 : AGP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATIoN tXr>BcftL Counsel for the Responden{ Nos.Z & 3 : GP FOR Ft}E)+i€' HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE The Court made the foltowing ORDER her Representation College, Peddapalli :I .1 l i PMD,J w.P-NO.I 1496-2022 .The petitioner fited the W'P'No'11496 of 2022 on 02.03.2022 before this Hon'ble High Court' Due to subsequent deuelopments' the petitioner has decided to uithdratrt the aboue said u'trit petition' I am instructedaccordingly.Hence,itisrequestedgouto tist the W'P'No'11496 of 2022 before appropiate bench under the caption of 'for rtLithdrau'tal"'' 2.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner into consideration' the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn There shall be no order as to costs' 3.

Miscellaneous Petitions' if any, Pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed' //TRUE COPY// SDi-T.KRISHNA KUMAR I ASSISTANT REGISTRAR !

I To 1.

2.

SECTION OFFICER Two CCs to GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION' High Court for the State ?t-'""3Sgilt!"t'Jl rH AND FAturLY *ELFARE' Hish court roiih" Stut" of Telangana lOUTl 5il ;d6!rRr.nerrrrEsH BURA,' Advocate [oPUC] 3 4 5 S.A Two CD CoPies One spare coPY d THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P'MADIIAVI DEVI w'P'No'11496 OF 2022 ORDER: Sri Ramesh Bura' learned counsel for the petitioner' has filed a memo dated 23'03'2022' stating as under:- C HIGH COURT DATE D:2 510312022 ORDER WP.No.11496 of 2022 I i j DISMISSING THE W,P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. i- ol: 1 * E D * E S 1 jt I'r 202 l]t ,l ?fi