Erigela Laxmama vs The State of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.

ABHISHEK REDDY Between: Erigela Laxmama, W{o shambhi Reddy, Age.

60 years, occ.

Agrir, Rl/o choutapaily Village, Mattampally Mandal, Suryapet Oistrid't, tS. ...PETITIONER AND 1.

The State of Telangana, Rep by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, TS.

2.

The District Collector, Suryapet, Suryapet District, TS.

3.

The Tahshildar, Mattampally lr,/andal, Suryapet District, TS. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court hay be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particuiarly one in ihe nature of writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 2nd Respondeht is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law for' not dispose the Dharani web portal Application vide LIvl 2100092534 and consequently direct the 2ND Respondent to dispose the Dharani Web Portal Application vide LM 2100092534. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the dharani web portal Application vide LM 2100092534.

WRI PETITION NO: 4732 F 2022 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.

SEETHARAM REDDy KANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER.

THE T ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4732 of 2022 Heard tlre learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government F leader for Revenue for the respondents.

With their consent, the W:it Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission.

2. ission.

Aggriever I by the inaction of the respondents in not considering the online app ication made by the petitioner for recording her name as pattadar in res pect of the subject land situated at choutapally vi11age, Mattampally M rnda1, Suryapet District, the present writ petition is filed.

Learned Sovernment pleader, on instructions, has stated that if some time is granted, the authorities will verify the claim of the petitioner and tass necessary orders on the online application made by the petitioner, ;trictly in accordance with law.

4.

Having r:gard to the above made submission, without going into the merits or cemerits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the r:spondent authorities to pass necessary orders on the on-line applica ion No.2100092534 made by the petitioner, strictiy in accordance wit.r law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, duly putting rll the interested parties on notice and taking into consideration t re objections, if any.

The mis< ellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

There shall be ro order as to costs. ,TRUE COPY' SD/.

T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR Ltl-l SECTION OFFICER I 1.

The Principal S ecretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat' Saifabad,State of Telangana, Hy ierabad, TS.

The District Cc llector, Suryapet, Suryapet District, TS.

To, i I I I Il*< l/ / ORDER: I I 3.

The Tahshildar, Mattampally ttlandal, Suryapet District' TS' 4.

One CC to SRl.

SEETHARAM REDDY KANCHARLA' Advocate [OPUC] 5'TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT] 6.

Two CD CoPies 7.

One SPare CoPY PB NPJ A\} II i l HIGH COURT DATED: 0110212022 ORDER WP.No.4732 o1 2022 DISPOSING OI; THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COS TS t , q:l ez ttB 2{i?2 o..Js,,' x ^'Y \x{y t,./ ;/ d"-eGffit\ I