B.Ramadevi vs The Pottisreeramulu Telugu University and 2 others
Party Details
- B Ramadevi
- The Pottisreeramulu Telugu University and 2 others
- The State of Telangana
- The State of Telangana
Case Summary
B Ramadevi filed Case No. WP 7451/2022 in the High Court for State of Telangana on 9 Feb 2022 against The Pottisreeramulu Telugu University and 2 others and The State of Telangana. The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 14 Feb 2022. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 14FEB 2022Next Hearing
Judge: N/A
Orders (2)
- 14FEB 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 1
- 14FEB 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: 1
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR IT PETI N NO: oF 20 Between: B.Ramadevi, W/o.Janaiah, Age 53 years Working as Sweeper, Pottisreeramulu Telugu University, Nampally Hyderabad ,..PETITIONER AND 1 The Pottisreeramulu Telugu University, Rep. by its Registrar, Nampally, Hyderabad The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt Higher Education Department, T.S.
Secretariat, Hyderabad The State of Telanqana, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt Finance (HRIV-1) Department.
T.S.
Secrela riat.
Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the orders passedbythe3rdrespondentinProc.No.PSTU/ll/Exam.Cell/Voch.Payment/2012 dl.?8.1.2022 in changing the status of appointment of the petitioner from daily wage / consolidate pay to that of contract / outsourcing engaged through society constituted under Cooperative Societies Act following G.O.Rt.No.
HRM Dept dt'19'2'2016 and G.O.Ms.No.63 Finance (HRM.VIl) Dept dt.15.6.2021 as illegal, arbitrary and is in violalion of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently declare that the petitioner's services cannot be treated as contract / outsourcing employee and services are to be treated only on daily wage / consolidated one in the interests. lA NO: 'l OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petilion, the High Courl may be pleased to issue lnterim Direction suspending the operation of the orders passed by the 3rd respondent in Proc.No.PSTU /ll/ EXam.Ce / Voch.payment / 2 3 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original J urisdiction) I\.,'IONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO 2012 d1.28.1.
2 d1.28.1.2022 so far as the petitioner is concerned and continue the petitioner as Daily Wage / Consolidated employee pending disposal of the Writ Petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P' V' RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No 1: SRI K'RAM MURTHY' Sc FOR UNIVERSITY Counsel for the Respondent No' 2: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No' 3: GP FOR SERVICES ' I The Court made the following: ORDER I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T' VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.
7 45L of 2022 ORDER: Heard iearncd counsel lor the petitioner' Sri K Ram Murthy' learnedStandingCounselappearingforl"|respondent-University, learned Government Pleadcr for Education appearing lor 2nd respondent and learned Government Pleader for Services-l appearing for 3'd respondent' and perused the record with their consent,thematteristakenupforhearinganddisposalatthe admission stage' 2.ThisWritPetitionhasbcenliledchaLienginglheProceecings No.PSTU,Tliitrx:Lm.CelliVoch Palmcntr 2O12' di 28'01 2022 issueC b)' rhe 3"r |esponcic:tl in chaltgir-tg thc statr.ls of pa1'ment oi the peritioner It om daih rlaqel'consolitlale ,'.'l.ll"j' ":''' L' " ' _ I 'r ":' '"" pay to that of 3.
Pcirliol',r'l L0l',i'.rtlils ill"l shI irlls trl;llllh ilpptlil'etl i"s 'l St'ct;lr-:t otl ir iirrsolrLl'ti'r'l ir'll' "i-il' iil0 :n ']"e rcar ''''': '':': ao:litrur.ii lts l'L illi:l'. ,'r,r.{t r:rrlr-'llrlr'l' l:li: ihc 1tr :csPrlll<lcrr:l "l_rlrl the 3'd respotlcltrllt nlso ;"rssctl o:-r'icr cll301 12007 e nhanc inq ''hc: consoliclated arloLLnt to Rs 5.580,i treating the petitioner 3s person s'orkit-tg on darill. rvage basis along rvith others; and u'hile that being so, [he respondents all ol a suddcn and uuilateraLll' bv the impugned proceedings sought to change the status ol payment of the petitioner from claily rvage / consolidate pay to lhat ol contracl/oLrtsourcing erigaged through society. .+.
On 11.02.
On 11.02.2022, learned Standing Counsel appearing lor 1"' rcspondcnt Universitr,, ott bcrng querietl b1' this Court as ro thc \ \ basis for the changing the 5.
Tocja_r, r.he l CoLtitsci irplrc.i i ij-rq lol tltr: Arilcnrlltcn L Lltr i]]ili tIr js iltliL:it lp, lc:Lrnc(1 l': tcspritrlL,li ltlr: i-,ilrr.ccl irr,lrri.r, t S ranciit.tg his C oLtr I \, 1:q1.' .1_l,t(;.\1_. \\,1, .ilHc,,tjlit) rcspolt(lcnt. [,]tcr.eb_r it ls staLed tmpugned pr-Oc.cedi n gs p:rssr starus, so,!rg'[ []r.ac ro qcl ,,," t' t" tll(' 3"i rcsponcrent Lrrtctiuils jl il)c I]]att|er Ol(lats tlL 1-l 02.2012, issLrcrj i_ri t.llc 1'r as under: t) respondent, is placed orr recor.cl "The pedtioner f,>mt B.R(tnct t petition in n"ir,u,"|,in'""!.e:i' .su)eeper) has rtted wit Hsderabad stating ;;, ;;;: ;.;::" ruisdiction of reransana outsourcing ,rrr" ,^",ro")" ir' n'"'ur"' no*u was sponsored b the 1o, pos,"it ", ,",;;* ;;:::ns her consotidated cotesory her co nssn2, so nl*' ;,: :,',.;:.,:^:::.: -is .occu fted wttho u t cot.Lsideration, aroppua ;u, ;:;;: * '"'r*o and taken ino cotlttnued her, ift the "orti", po"ttri from outsourcing rist and no - chanse has been,"o";--;;::" "ffi'":*;: t::::,::: infarmation to the Hon,ble High Cotol oJ .fetangena, HAdercbad,,. l'hc saicl Anrendntclt Orclt.r cir.
1 2.02..10-2-l /' lJaling t-cg.r.d l. rlte .llt(.1(litictii utdt,i lcsponalcnl, the grier nncc oi. ihc ltclili!;ttr :n isslred by the 1sr issuecl b,y she 1" Lhe prc.sent u,riI PcLllloll ,'jtanals tcdlcssctt irtial ltr) l,.,,rlicl i_,:-tltrs t,r( rtrtrLji.ecL t,t be passed by tl.ris Court in this Wrir pe rition 8.
Accordingll., this Wrir pr:ltition js closed.
No .rr(lcr- as ro CoStS 9, Consequently, misceilaneous petitions, if any pendins, shau stand closed.
SDI.T.KRISHNA KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER , HYderabad The Regrstrar' I'TRUE COPYII n\versliY ' Nampa\lY Potisreera mrr\u -I e\ugu U ovt To, 2 ry,,t"1::,lt :. "1::,lt :.:'{:E"ry;?'"t ,HY Higher E derabao' ducaflon OePartrn ent, State oI 3, rhe princ,par se"{::?} j:f,",$JJ[il%: *** t ] Department' state o{ Telangana' r 'o' u"" - \A Advocate [oPucl - -" ^ dvocate loPucl a one cc to sRr P " -^.^:l*. ;;ro* u*'ur*.,t"^l ot r"runsun, ut s. on" cc to sRr K *Y]['il-'irst]court tor tne stat€ I ll#"t;lt f:1i1"*" "ES-r, Hish courrrorthe stats orreransana at , I,Y3i,,";:" fJuli* "" 8.
Two CD Copies 9. one spare copy He., tr}." SW J \ HIGH COURT DATED:1410212022 ORDER WP.No.7451 ot 2022 aZ r.:.r. ?iT 'i I osxs' pt =::- $ ,\. or