Uppari Eeshwaramma vs The State of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT.

JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WP NO: 1695 OF 22 Between: Uppari Somulu, S/o.

Uppari Narsimulu aged 46 years, Occ.

Agric_ulture H No.

7-1 58.Kamatham peta, leeza Mandal, Mahabub Nagar, Telangana 509127 ...PETITIONER AND 1.

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue Land Acquisition, Secretariat, Hyderabad Telanuana 2.

The District Collector, Jogulamba, Gadwal DistricLTelangana 3.

The Joint Collector, Cum Land Acquisition officer.

Jogulamba, Gadwal District, Telangana 4.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. by the Chairman, Sector 10 Dwaraka, New Delhi 1 1 0075 5.

The National Highway of lndia, Rep. by the Chairman, RoaDs Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Telangana .,,RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction more partlcularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated 23.07.2021 and also tale into consideration the fact that Petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the Petitioner which is situated at Aiza village leeja village, leeja Mandal, Gadwal District, Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-lane road from K.M.

202.900 to 255.887 starting from Raichur to Gadwal Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal Distriet,Telangana as per the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00,000/- to Rs.1,00,00.0001 per acre' which is also as per the provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and reiettlement Act 2013, otherwise, the Petitioner will sustain huge loss and also declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the above representations and also not taking into consideration ideration the prevailing rate while deciding the compensation as arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to consider the representations dated 2310712021 and also take into consideration the fact that petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at Aiza village leeja Village, leeja Mandal, Gadwall District, Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-Lane road from K.M.202.900 to255.887 starting from Raichur to Gadwal Road in WRIT PETITION NOS: 1695.

1710.

1729. '1778.

188s.

1889.

1945 AND 1957 0F 2022 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.

M/s.

OM LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.

1 to 3: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.

4 & 5: SRl.

A.

LAXMI NARAYANA, SC FOR NHAI WP : 1710 OF 2022 Between: AND IANO: 1OF2 022 I R?Ta Krishna, S/o.

Narsimulu aged 38 years, Occ- Agriculture rlo leeza Mandal and village, Gadwal, Mahabub-Nagar, ielangana 509127 ...PETITIONER '1 .

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secrelary, Dept. of Revenue Land acquisition, Secretariat, Hyderabad Telangana.

2, The District Collector, Jogulamba, Gadwal District, Telangana 3.

The Joint collector cum Land Acquisition officer, Jogulamba, Gadwal District, Telangana 4.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. by the Chairman, Sector 10 Dwaraka, New Delhi 1 10075 5.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. by the Chairman, Road No.

3 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Telangana ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court hay be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated 3010812021 and also take into consideration the fact that Petitioner are entifled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at Aiza village @ leeja village, leeja Mandal, Gadwal District, Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-lane road from K.M.202.900 to 25s.867 starting from Raichur to Gadwal Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District,Telangana as p6r the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00,000/- to Rs.

1,o0,oo,ooo/- per acre, whlch is also as per the provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 2013, otherwise, the petitioner will sustain huge loss and also declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the above representations and also not taking into consideration the prevailing rate while deciding the compensation as arbitrary, unjust and violative of ArticlJ i4,21 and 300- A of the Constitution of lndia.

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased direct the respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated 3olo}t2o21 and also take into consideration the fact that petitioner are enti ed to be paid compensatitn for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at Riza viiiage 6-ree1a village, leeja Mandar, Gadwar District, Telangana, which are oeing aJquireo ror laying a 6-tane road from K.M.

2oz.goo to 255:BB7 starting from RaiJhurtiiClowar Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana asper the prevailing rate of Rs.60,00,000- Rs.1,00,00,0001 per acre, which ls also as per the provisions of Right to Fajr Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 otherurise the petitioner will sustain huge loss pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of equity of justice. f justice.

Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District ,Telangana as per the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00,000/- to Rs.1 ,OO,00,000/- per acre, which is also as per the provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 2013, otherwise, the Petitioner will sustain huge loss, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of equity of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.

4 & 5: SRI' A.

LAXMI NARAYANA, SC FOR NHAI WP NO: 1729 OF 2022 Between: Uppari Ramesh, S/o.

Uppari Narsimu-lu aged 4.1 years, Occ.

Agriculture H.No.

7j1'5B,Kamatham peta, leeza Mandal.

Mahabub Nagar' Telangana 509127 ...PETITIONER AND 1 .

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Dept of Revenue Land acquisition, Secretariat, Hyderabad Telangana 2.

The District Collector, Jogulamba, Gadwal District,Telangana 3.

The Joint Collector, Cum Land Acquisition officer, Jogulamba, Gadwal D istrict,Te la nga n a 4.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. by the Chairman' Sector '10 Dwaraka, New Delhi 1 10075 5.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. by the Chairman, Road No' 3 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Telangana . ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated 2310712021 and also take into conSideration the fact that Petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the Petitioner which is situated atAiza village 'leeja village, leeja Mandal, Gadwal District.

Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-lane road from K.M.

202.900 to 255.

00 to 255.887 starting from Raichurto Gadwal Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a.writ order or a direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated 23t0712021 and also take into consideration the fact that Petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the Petitioner which is situated at Aiza village alias leeja village, leeja Mandal, Gadwal District, Telangana, which are being aCquired for laying a 6-lane road from K.M.

202.900 to 255.887 starting from Raiihur to Gadwal Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District,Telangana as per the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00,000/- to Rs.'l ,00,00,0001 per acre' which is also as per ihe provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in Iand acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 20'1 3, otherwise, the Petitioner will sustain huge loss and also declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the above representations and also not taking into consideration the prevailing rate while deciding the compensation as arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India.

Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District ,Telangana as per the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00.000/- to Rs.1.00.00.0001 per acre, which is also as per the provisrons of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitalion and resettlement Act 2013, otherwise, the Petitioner will sustain huge loss, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of equity of justice.

LAXMI NARAYANA, SC FOR NHA| WP NO: 1778 OF 2022 Between: Uppari Eeshwaramma, Wo.

Uppari Agriculture H.

No. ure H.

No.

1 1-33,Kamatham Telangana 509127 Chinna Ashanna aged 63 years, Occ. peta, leeza Mandal, Mahabub Nagar, ...PETITIONER 1.

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue Land acquisition, Secretariat, Hyderabad Telangana .

2.

The Joint Collector, Cum Land Acquisition officer, Jogulamba, Gadwal District,Telanga na 4.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. by the Chairman, Sector 1O Dwaraka, New Delhi 1 1 0075 5.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. bv the Chairman, Road No.

3 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Telangana . ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court hay be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mendamus directing the respondents No to consider the representations dated 23.07.2021 and also take into consideration the fact that Petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at Aiza village leeja village, leeja Mandal, Gadwal District, Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-lane road from K.M.

2o2.9oo to 2ss.B-87 starting from Raichur to Gadwal Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District,Telangana as pEr the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00,000i- to Rs..1,00,00,000/- per acre, which is also as per the provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acqulsition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 2013, otheruvise, the petitioner will sustain huge loss and also declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the above representations and also not taking into consideration the prevailing rate while deciding the compensation as arbitrary, unjust and violative ot nrti.ti 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia. of lndia. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 'l 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased ro airect the respondent No.3 to consider the representalions dated 23 -ol -zozl and also take into consideration the fact that petitioner are enti|ed to be paid compensation for the above part of the rand of the petitioner which is situated ,i ei..

VirLg" r"";" Village, leeja Mandal, Gadw€ll- District, Telangana, which are Oeing afq;[O fo,. laying a 6-Lane road from K.M,202.900 to 2s5.-887 starting from Raiciur to Gadwal AND Road in Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana asper the prevailing rate of Rs.60,00,000/- Rs.1,00,00,000/- per acre, which is also as per the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 20'13 otherwise the petitioner will sustain huge loss pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of equity of justice.

LAXMI NARAYANA, SC FOR NHAI WRIT PETITION NO: 1885 OF 2022 Between: G.Naravana.

S/o.Pedha Hanmanna, aged 61 years, Occ.

Agriculture, H No 8-3, leeza N,{andal and village, Mahabub Nagar, Telangana 509127. ,,,PETITIONER 1.

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue Land acquisition, Secretariat, Hyderabad Telangana 2.

The Joint collector, cum Land Acquisition officer, Jogulamba, Gadwal District, Telangana.

4.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. by the Chairman, Sector 10 Dwaraka, New Delhi '1 10075.

5.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. ndia, Rep. by the Chairman, Road No 3 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Telangana' Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated.

23.07.2021 and also take into consideration the fact that Petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the Petitioner which is situated at Aiza viilage @ leeja village, leela Mandal, Gadwal District, Telangana, which are being acquiied ior taying a 6-lane road from K.lV.

202.900 to 255.887 starting from Raichur io Gadwal Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District,Telangana as per the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00,0001 to Rs.

1,00,00,000/- per acre, which is also as per ihe provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 2013, otherwise, the Petitioner wiH sustain huge loss and also declare the action of the Respondents in not considerlng the above representations and also not taking into consideration the prevailing rate while deciding the compensation as arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia. ...RESPONDENTS IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to consider the representations dated 23-07 -2021 and also take into consideration the fact that petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at Aiza Village @ leeja Village, leeja Mandal, Gadwall District, Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-Lane road from K.M.202.900 to 255.

00 to 255.887 starting from Raichur to AND Gadwal Road in Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana asper the prevailing rate of Rs.60,00,000/- Rs.1,00,00,000/- per acre, which is also as per the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 otherwise the petitioner will sustain huge loss pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of equity of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated 23.07.2021 and also take into consideration the fact that Petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at Aiza village @leeja village, leeja Mandal.

Gadwal District, Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-lane road from K.I/.

2o2.9oo to 255,8b7 starting from Raichur to Gadwal Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District,Tela ngana as per the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00,000/- to Rs..l ,00,00,0001 per acre, which is also as per the provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 2013, otherwise, the petitioner will sustain huge loss and also declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the above representations and also not taking into consideration the prevailing rate while deciding the compensation as arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia.

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased direct the respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated 23.o7. ted 23.o7.2021 and also take into consideration the fact that petitioner are entitled to be paid compensaiion for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at Aiza vi age pleela village, leeja Mandar, Gadwar District, Terangana, which are oerng a;"quirft ror laying a 6-lane road from K.M.

2o2.goo to 255.887 starting from Raic-hur to Gadwat Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.

LAXMI NARAYANA, SC FOR NHAI WP NO: 1889 OF 2022 Between: T.

Thayanna, S/o.

Gouranna aged 56 years, Occ.

Agriculture H.

9-34, leeza Mandal, Gadwal Mahabub Nagar, Telangana 509127 ..,PETITIONER AND 1.

The State ofTelangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue Land acquisition, Secretariat, Hyderabad Telangana .

The Joint Collector, Cum Land Acquisition officer, Jogulamba, Gadwal District,Telangana 4.

3 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Telangana Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District ,Telangana as per the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00,0001 to Rs.1,00,00,0001 per acre, which is also as per the provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and reiettlement Act 2013, otherwise, the Petitioner will sustain huge loss, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of equity of justice.

1 to 3: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: SRI' A.

LAXMI NARAYANA, SC FOR NHAI WP NO: 1945 OF 2022 Between: Uooan Narsimhulu alias Gumm Narsimhulu, S/o.

Uppari Hanumanna alias Pbbda Hanumanna aged 46 years, Occ.

Agriculture, H.

No. re, H.

No.4/3,Kamatham peta, leeza tr,4andal, Mahabub Nagar, Telangana 509127 ...PETITIONER AND '1 .

The Joint Collector, cum Land Acquisition officer, Jogulamba, Gadwal District, Telangana 4.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep. by the Chairman, Sector '10 Dwaraka, New Delhi 110075 5.

The National Highway Authority of lndia, Rep by the Chairman, Road No 3 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Telangana ...RESPONDENTS IA NO: 1 0F 2022 Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated 23t0712021 and also take into consideration the fact that Petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the Petitioner which is situated at Aiza village alias leeja village, leeja Mandal, Gadwal District, Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-lane road from K.M.

202.900 to 255.887 starting from Raiihur to Gadwal Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District, Telangana as per the prevailing rate of Rs 60,OO,OOO/- to Rs 1,00,00,0001 per acre, which is also as per ihe provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in Iand acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 2013, otherwise, the Petitioner will sustain huge loss and also declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the above representations and also not taking into consideration the prevailing rate while deciding the compensation as arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia. of lndia.

Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to consider the representations dated 23-07 -2021 and also take into consideration the fact that petitioner are entitled to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at Aiza Village alias leeja Village, leeja Mandal, Gadwall District, Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-Lane road from K.M.202-900 to 255.887 starting from Raichur to Gadwal Road in Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana asper the prevailing rate of Rs.60,00,0001 Rs.'1 ,00,00,000/- per acre, which is also as per the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 otherwise the petitioner will sustain huge loss pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of equity of justice.

1 to 3: GP FOR LANO ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondent Nos.

LAXMI NARAYANA, SC FOR NHAI WP NO: 1957 OF 2022 Between: Uppari Venkamma, W/o.

Uppari Pedda Ashanna aged 68 years, Occ.

Agricullure H.

7-5311 ,Kamatham peta, leeza Mandal, tvlahabub Nagar, Telangana 509127 ...PETITIONER 1.

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue Land Acquisition, Secretariat, Hyderabad Telangana.

3 Banjara Hills, Hyderabad Telangana . ... gana . ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or a direction, more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents No.3 to consider the representations dated 23.07.2021 and also take into consideration the fact that Petitioner are enti ed to be paid compensation for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at Aiza village @leeja village, leeja tvlandal, Gadwal District, Telangana, which are being acquired for laying a 6-lane road from K.lv.

202.900 to 255.gg7 starting from Raichur to Gadwal Road in Jogulamba, Gadwal District,Telangana as p6r the prevailing rate of Rs 60,00,000/- to Rs.

1,00,00,000/- per acre, which is also as per the provisions of Right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 2013, othenvise, the petitioner will sustain huge loss and also declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the above representations and also not taking into consideration the prevailing rate while deciding the compensation as arbitrary, unjust and violative of Articli 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia.

AND lA NO: 1 oF 2022 Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, ine-Hign court may oe pieuilo to oir"ct the respondent No.3 to consider the representa'iions dated '23-07-2021 and also take into consideration the fact that petitioner are entifled to ue paiu compensation for the above part of the land of the petitioner which is situated at eiza iiriale 6 leeja Village, leeja Mandal, Gadwall -Dl:trl9t, Telangana, which are Oeing acq"uireA for laying a 6-Lane road from K.M.202.900 to 25!.s87 starting rrorn ft"i"ilr, ro Gadwal Road in Jogulamba Gadwal District, Telangana as per the prevailing rate of Rs.60,00,000- Rs.

0,000- Rs.1 ,00,00,0001- per acre, which is also as per the provisions of Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 otherwise the petitioner will sustain huge loss pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of equity of justice.

LAXMI NARAYANA, SC FOR NHAI The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE DT.

JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION Nos.1695.

1710' 1729' 1778' 1885' 1889' 1945 and 1957 OF 2O22 COMMON ORDER: Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions is identical, all these writ petitions are taken up together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2, In these writ petitions, the petitioners seek a direction to the Joint Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Offlcer, Jogulamba, Gadwal District, to consider their representations submitted with regard to grant of compensation as per the prevailing rate and also as per the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition (Rehabilitation and Resettlement) Act, 20L3, for acquiring their lands for laying a 6-lane road from K'M'202'900 to 255'887 starting from Raichur to Gadwal road in Jogulamba Gadwal District.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the record.

4, In the course of submissions, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Standing Counsel for National Highway Authority of India that Award Nos.G/1013/2018 and Gl4L2/2021, dated 15.72.2021, have been passed by the Additional Collector-cum- Competent Authority for Land Acquisition (NHAI), Jogulamba, Gadwal District, in relation to the subject properties.

The said submission of the learned Standing Counsel for National Highway Authority of India is taken on record, 2 6. cord, 2 6.

In view of the submission made by the lea rned Standing of India, no orders are Counsel for National Highway Authority required to be passed in these writ petitions' However' liberty is granted to the petitioners to work out the remedies available under law, 7 With the above observation' all these writ Petitions are disposed of.

Miscellaneous Petitions' if any' pending in these Writ Petitions shall stand closed ' There shall be no order as to costs' SD/.

B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER tourl 9.

Two CD CoPies '10.One Spare CoPY' 1 The Secretary, Dept of Revenue Land Acquisition' State of Telangana' ' secretariat, HYderabadTelanuSllo"o*"' Disrrict,Telanqana , in" oittri"t Collector' JogulamDa ' -traurll I'ni"..r 'Looula-mba, Gadwat District' 6. i'r! l"ii.,i"i";r"ttioi' cu'.lund Acquisition orricer' Jos Telangana Highway Authority of lndia' sector 10 Dwaraka New 4.

The Chairman' National I ' o"tni t toozs ' r r:^-^r Highway of lndia' Roads Banjara Hills' Hyderabad 5.

The Chairman' Natlonal Telanqana 6 o;: ;; i; Y"s ^o{flIu:5Ul::J3}", NHA, ropucl i One CC to Sri A Laxmt Narayat ':.:-";'^; r:.,,,tt ior the State of Telangana' i Y-l EcJ t;GP tor tand Acqiisition' Hish court tol To, PM r,xJ\' HIGH COURT DArEOilgl0'112022 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.

1695, 1710, 1729, 1778, 1885, 1889, 1945 &1957 of2022 Disposing of the WPs Without costs. ry 03 rEB 2022 r.' * o i) 'i. r,<** -t 14i4 s e ll 1 o ^\\ 'q"'\