Kummari Anjaiah vs The State of Telanagana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVt WRIT PETITION NO: 1921 OF 2022 Between: Kummari Anjaiah, S/o, Kummari Ramaiah, aged 70 years, Occ: Business, Fl/o H No.

4-2 (Old), 1-152(New), Nandigama (Vi and Mdl), District.

Rangareddy, Telangana 509228 ...PETrroNER AND 1.

The State of Telanagana, Rep by its Principle Secretary Panchayathraj and Rural Development, TS Secretariat Hyderabad, Telangana.

2.

The District Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy Dist.

3.

The Gram Panchayat, Nandigama Rep by its Panchayat Secretary Nandigama (Vi and Mdl), Erstwhile Mahaboobnagar District.

Ranga Reddy.District ONDENT' Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularlyr one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to not to interfere with a peaceful possession of the petitioner's house bearing No.1 -1 52 comprising of room with iron sheets under the limits of Nandigama Grampanchayath and declare the action of respondent No.2 in issuance of notice dated 05/01/2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principals of natural justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to not to interfere with the Petitioner's peaceful possession of the petitioner's house bearing No.1-'1 52 comprising of room with iron sheets under the limits of Nandigama Grampanchayath without the due process of law. counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.

M.

AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondents No.

3: SRl.

RAMGOPAL RAO SC FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ The Court made the following: OROER THE H(,N'BLE SMT JUSTICE P,MADHAVI DEVI.

IT ET TI NN 1 1 t2 ORDER Learned c( unsel for the petitioner unconditionally seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ petition.

Permission i; accorded.

Accordingly, this Writ petition is dismissed as withclrawn.

No costs.

Miscellaneot s petitions, if any, sha ll stand closed pending in this'Writ petition, v I 3 :-.%-- o, /iTRUE COPY'/ SD/.K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAi- i SECTION OFFICER T TR 1.

2. !;3 33J?" t8rl,iElflxln Advoc-ate .opucr ffiF tT 5j,# *i*",#ft :i : '-,::: ; ;; One Spare Copy a 4 5.

Court for the State of Raj. [oPUC] \ &, HIGH COURT DATED:1 210112( 22 ORDER WP.No.1921 ol 2022 DISIVISSING TH : WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWI WITHOUT COSTS 1? .tlii?li?- I i:l ,), f)