Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

ANIL KUMAR vs IMPERIA STRUCTURES LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-250-2021
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing12 Jul 2023
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • ANIL KUMAR
Respondent
  • IMPERIA STRUCTURES LTD.

Case Summary

ANIL KUMAR filed Case No. RERA-GRG-250-2021 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against IMPERIA STRUCTURES LTD.. The case has undergone 9 hearings over 2 years and 4 months. The case was disposed of on 12 Jul 2023. 8 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (9)

  • 12JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Both the counsels for the parties  state at bar that the matter has already been settled between the parties amicably and a settlement deed  to this effect has been placed on the record duly signed by both the parties. In view of settlement deed,  the matter stands disposed off.  File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 12APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Both the parties state at bar that the matter is under settlement and the case may be listed after 10.05.2023. Matter to come up on 12.07.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 13DEC 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint has been received on 27.01.2021. Reply on behalf of respondent has been received on 18.05.2022. Succinct facts of the case as per complaint and annexures are as under: S. N. Particulars Details 1. Name and location of the project “The Esfera” Phase II at sector 37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana 2. Nature of the project Group Housing Complex 3. Project area 17 acres 4. DTCP license no.                    64 of 2011 dated 06.07.2011 valid upto 15.07.2017 5. Name of licensee M/s Phonix Datatech Services Pvt Ltd and 4 others 6. RERA Registered/ not registered Registered vide no. 352 of 2017 issued on 17.11.2017 up to 31.12.2020 7. Apartment no. 501, 5th Floor, Block H (page no. 32 of complaint) 8. Unit area admeasuring 1650 sq. ft. (page no. 32 of complaint) 9. Date of booking 17.09.2011 (page no. 19 of complaint) 10. Date of builder buyer agreement 21.02.2013 (page no. 30 of complaint) 11. Date of cancellation letter 04.10.2013 (page no. 06 of reply) 12. Possession clause 10.1. SCHEDULE FOR POSSESSION “The developer based on its present plans and estimates and subject to all just exceptions, contemplates to complete the construction of the said building/said apartment within a period of three and half years from the date of execution of this agreement unless there shall be delay or there shall be failure due to reasons mentioned in clause 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, and clause 41 or due to failure of allottee(s) to pay in time the price of the said unit along with other charges and dues in accordance with the schedule of payments given in annexure C or as per the demands raised by the developer from time to time or any failure on the part of the allottee to abide by all or any of the terms or conditions of this agreement.” (emphasis supplied) 13. Due date of possession  21.08.2016 [calculated as per possession clause] 14. Total sale consideration Rs. 69,66,500/- [as per the agreement on page no. 38 of complaint] 15. Amount paid by the complainant Rs. 21,14,263/- [as per receipts annexed on page no. 21-26 of complaint] 16. Occupation certificate Not received 17.  Offer of possession Not offered The counsel for the respondent states that the complaint is time barred and is beyond the period of limitation as the unit was cancelled on 04.10.2013 due to non payment of instalments by the complainant-allottee and a refund cheque of Rs.10,33,508/- in favour of allottee was also offered after deduction of 15% earnest money alongwith taxes paid and brokerage etc. The respondent is still offering the refund of above amount to the complainant before next date of hearing. The counsel for the complainant is also open to mutual settlement and if the matter is amicably settled, shall withdraw the complaint. Matter to come up on 12.04.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 16SEP 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The Authority is busy to attend the meeting at Chandigarh, so the matter is adjourned to 13.12.2022 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 11MAY 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The file has been received on transfer from the court of adjudicating officer in view of the judgment dated 11.11.2021 passed by the Apex Court in case titled as M/s Newtech Promoters and Developer s Pvt Ltd Versus State of U.P. and Ors. wherein it was held that the matter regarding refund and interest under section 18(1) are to be decided by the authority and matter regarding adjudicating compensation to be decided by adjudicating officer. The present complaint was filed on 27.01.2021 and registered as complaint no. 250 of 2021. The registry of the adjudicating officer sent a notice through email vide dated 22.02.2021, 08.06.2021 at the following email address [email protected], [email protected]. The same is shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file. It is proper service of the notice. Subsequently, respondent has marked his appearance on 26.02.2021 and 25.08.2021. However, no reply has been received on behalf of the respondent till date. The  counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent  seeks some time to file the reply.  Respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 25.05.2022 in the registry with a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off.                 Matter to come up on  16.9.2022 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10FEB 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

    In view  of judgment dated 11.11.2021 in title- M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of UP & Ors. Etc. passed by the  Apex Court, this forum has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the complaint in hands.                              File be transferred to the Authority. Next date will be notified later on by the Authority. Reader is directed to send the file immediately.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 25AUG 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

    Matter was fixed for final arguments. Learned counsel for respondent seeks adjournment stating that he has been engaged only two days back. 2.                     To come  on 10.02.2022  for arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 17MAY 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL

    Due to increase in the Covid-19 cases in and around the area of the Authority and lockdown in the State, the case is not being taken up for hearing. Hence, as per directions of the Hon’ble Authority, it is being adjourned to 25.08.2021 for the proceedings already fixed. 2.         Both the parties be informed accordingly through e-mail.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26FEB 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL

    In pursuance to notice, the respondent put in appearance through its counsel Shri Rahul Pandey and who filed PoA. 2.      Copy of complaint and other documents supplied. Written reply alongwith documents be filed 2 weeks prior to the date fixed with a copy to the other side and the matter be put up on 17.05.2021 for arguments.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (8)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

ffi HARERA *S, eunuennur HARYANA NEAI ESTATE REGUTATORY AUIHORITY GURUGRAM Efrqrun triq-fl frf{qrq-6 crfuflq, Tt-rrq New PWO Rest Houte Civil Line)' 6urugram' Haryan' d{r I' Rird arl€ PROCEEDINGS OF THE DAY WednesdaY and 12.07 2023 Day and Date c-Rtzs,o /2021Case titled as ANIL KUMAR v. irur pdRta srRucruREs LIMITED Complaint No.

ANIL KUMAR Complainant Complainant in Person Represented through IMPERIA STRUCTURES LIMITED Respondent Shri Roopam Sharma ProxY counsel Respondent RePresented L2.04.2023 Last date ofhearing Naresh Kumari and HR Mehta Proceeding Recorded bY Proceedings Both the counsels for the parties state at bar that the matter has already been ffiil;il;;he parties amicably and a settlement.deed to this effect has Leen placed on the record duly signed by both the partles' Inviewofsettlementdeed,thematterStandsdisposedoff'Filebeconsigned to the registry. ber att:otO