Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

NARESH KUMAR JAIN vs EMAAR MGF LAND LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-2348-2021
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing5 Jul 2023
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • NARESH KUMAR JAIN
Respondent
  • EMAAR MGF LAND LTD.

Case Summary

NARESH KUMAR JAIN filed Case No. RERA-GRG-2348-2021 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against EMAAR MGF LAND LTD.. The case has undergone 11 hearings over 1 year and 10 months. The case was disposed of on 5 Jul 2023. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (11)

  • 5JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The counsel for the complainant has moved an application for withdrawal of the complaint on the ground that the  parties have already settled the dispute amicably. In view of the above,  the matter stands disposed off.  File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 5APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The counsel for the complainant wishes to file rejoinder to the reply filed by the respondent. The rejoinder may be filed within a period of 2 weeks. Matter to come up on 05.07.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 12JAN 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The proxy counsel for the complainant seeks a short adjournment as the main counsel is not well.  Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 05.04.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 15SEP 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Due to paucity of time the matter could not be heard. Matter to come up on 12.1.2023 for the purpose already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 12MAY 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The file has been received on transfer from the  adjudicating officer in view of the judgment dated 11.11.2021 passed by the Apex Court in case titled as M/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd Versus State of U.P. and Ors. wherein it was held that when it comes to refund of the amount, and interest on the refund amount, or directing payment of interest for delayed delivery of possession, or penalty and interest thereon, it is the regulatory authority which has the power to examine and determine the outcome of such complaint. The present complaint was filed in ‘Form CAO’ on 07.06.2021 and the reply has been filed by the respondent on 01.09.2021.  Subsequently, the complaint has been filed in ‘Form CRA’ on 08.04.2022.                  In the present complaint,  the complainant is seeking relief w.r.t pre-EMIs to be paid by the respondent in terms of subvention scheme opted by the complainant.               The counsel for the respondent submitted that concerned Bank may be impleaded as a  necessary party  before adjudicating upon the aforesaid relief.               Keeping in view the above,  the authority is of the view that  a notice be issued to  HDFC Limited  as to why the bank should not be impleaded  as Respondent No.2 on the basis of record available in the file.                Registry is directed to  take necessary action  and issue a notice to  HDFC Limited to  appear before the authority on the next date of hearing  i.e. 15.09.2022 and  file written  reply within a period of 15 days in the registry with an advance copy to the respondent No. 1 - Emaar India Limited as well as to the complainant.   Matter to come up on 15.9.2022 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 4MAR 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    In view of judgment dated 11.11.2021 in title- Ms Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs State of UP Ors. Etc. passed by the Apex Court this forum has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the complaint in hands. File be transferred to the Authority. Next date will be notified later on by the Authority. Reader is directed to send the file immediately.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 3DEC 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    MATTER IS ADJOURNED TO 04.03.2002

    Stage: PENDING

  • 30NOV 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

    Adjudicating officer is on leave, adjourned to  03.12.2021.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 29NOV 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

    To come for consideration on application filed by counsel for complainant seeking modification of order dated 01.09.2021.                         To come on 30.11.2021.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26OCT 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

    On request of counsel for applicant, adjourned to 29.11.2021 on consideration of application. 2                         To come on 29.11.2021.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 1SEP 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: RAJINDER KUMAR

    Matter was fixed for final arguments.  Written reply has already been filed. Copy supplied today. 2.                      To come on 07.03.2022 for arguments.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (10)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

* HARERA S- euRuennv HARYANA REAI.

ESTATE REGUI.AIORY AU]}IORITY GURUGRAM sftqrun triq-< frftqrc-o crkfi"r.

Tcqrc New Pwo Rest Nouser civil Lines, Gurusram, Haryana ,ra fi.3.i1:a. ftrnf, 7IE RE-d a6€.I.zr,I ifr-{r"Tr PROCEEDINGS OF THE DAY 40 Dayand Date Wednesday and 05.07.202 3 Complaint No.

CR/23+8/2021 Case titled as NARESH KUMAR ]AIN Vs EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED Complainant NARESH KUMAR JAIN Represented through Shri Shubham Chopra Advocate Respondent EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED Respondent Represented Shri Harshit Batra Advocate Last date ofhearing 05.04.2023 Proceeding Recorded by Naresh Kumari and HR Mehta Proceedings The counsel for the complainant has moved an application for withdrawal of the complaint on the ground that the parties have already settled the dispute amicably.

In view of the above, the matter stands disposed offl File be consigned to the registry.

Ashok S Mem 05.07.2 An Aurhoritv .o.s!rured under s€cron 20 ihe Real Esratc lnegutaton ana oe"etopmntl ecr, :oto {rira &frlE it{ f.+F) ,frfrq, 2ot6:6r 6{ 20i rtrn nnn qrt5g