Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

NEELAM MALHOTRA vs VATIKA LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-2183-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing8 Aug 2023
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • NEELAM MALHOTRA
Respondent
  • VATIKA LIMITED

Case Summary

NEELAM MALHOTRA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-2183-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against VATIKA LIMITED. The case has undergone 4 hearings over 11 months. The case was disposed of on 8 Aug 2023. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (4)

  • 8AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The  counsel for the complainant has moved an application dated 01.08.2023 for withdrawal of the complaint on the ground that the complainant has received the final payment from the respondent and there is no further  dispute pending between the parties. In view of above,  the matter stands disposed off. File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 2MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The counsel for the respondent has placed on record settlement deed dated 16.03.2023 vide which final payment to the complainant shall be made on 18.06.2023.    The counsel for the complainant states that the matter may be listed on any date after the final date for payment so that the settlement could be closed. Matter to come up on 08.08.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 2DEC 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 11.05.2022 and registered as complaint No. 2183 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected][email protected] and the same are shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file.  It is not proper service of the notice. On last date of hearing i.e. 02.09.2022, the respondent was directed to file reply within 15 days with an advance copy to the complainant. The counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant. The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 16.12.2022 in the registry of the authority. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off. The matter to come up on 02.05.2023  for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 2SEP 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 11.05.2022 and registered as complaint No. 2183 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected][email protected] and the same are shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file.  It is not proper service of the notice. Reply not filed by the respondent till date.  The counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of the reply to the counsel of the complainant during proceedings and requests for a short adjournment for filing reply in the registry of the authority. The respondent is directed to file reply within one week i.e. by 09.09.2022 in the registry of the authority. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off.               The matter to come up on 02.12.2022 for further proceedings

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (5)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

"dffi' Itr\ t?Ul( FN HARYANA E I( GURUGRA :PA[/ EfrqruIT q ESTATE REGULA x ftftqrro'sr RY T€qrq New PWD Rest ruse, Civil Llnes, Gurugram, Haryana rqr fr.rc--q.fr, Er1a efc frl a arf+ fkrrun PROICEEDINGS OF THE DAY 5B Day and Di te T resday and 08.08.2( 23 Complaint tJo.

C N l/21,83/2022 Cast alhotra Vs Vatika Li titl nite< d as Neelam Complaina rt N :elam Malhotra Ilepresent d through S rri Abhijeet Gupta A lvocr te Ilesponder t V rtika Limited Ilcsponder t l{epresented S A /Shri Venket lLao a lvocates rdP nkaj Chandola Last date c I hearing 0 a.05.2023 Proceedin Recorded by I\ aresh Kumari and F RMe Ita 'Iher coun for withdr received t dispute pe In view ol registry.

Pror rel for the comtrllainant ha awal of the complaint o: re final payment from t rding between the parties above, the matter stanc eedings moved an applicat r the ground that re respondent and S disposed off.

File on di hec ther be c shok Mr 08.( ted 01.ll8.Z0Z3 lmplairLant has l is no further rnsignerJ to the I /\^ ,.---- Sanffi,rn mbArl a.zddz An Au Act,2O16 td-ra (FafrTffr 3it{ Fdrrr) 1l DStaLC lNeBUlatl(rll dllq I 2016f,r URr 20*. rfrri zTkd