Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

SHIKHA HORA KAMDAR vs IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT.LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-1524-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing14 Sept 2023
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • SHIKHA HORA KAMDAR
Respondent
  • IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT.LTD.

Case Summary

SHIKHA HORA KAMDAR filed Case No. RERA-GRG-1524-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT.LTD.. The case has undergone 10 hearings over 1 year and 1 month. The case was disposed of on 14 Sept 2023. 11 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (10)

  • 14SEP 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter is disposed of.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 10AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was last heard on 06.07.2023 where the case was reserved for pronouncement of order. However, meanwhile complainant filed an application for amendment of complaint on 17.07.2023 and is seeking delay possession charges for delay in handing over of possession.    The proxy counsel for the respondent states that settlement talks are going  on between the parties and they are ready for the adjustment of delayed possession charges.  Both the parties may settle the dispute w.r.t. adjustment of amount in the DPC.  If the matter is not settled then the order will be announced on the next date of hearing.   Matter to come up on 14.09.2023 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 3AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    In view of the meeting  convened  by the Hon’ble Chairman,  Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal on 02.08.2023 at Chandigarh, the case was adjourned.           The matter to come up on  10.08.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The counsel for respondent stated that the due date for handing over of possession was 27.11.2018 and the OC of the project was received on 27.01.2022. Thereafter the offer was also made on 16.02.2022. He further submits that the unit is ready for possession and if the complainant wishes to continue with the project, they are ready to hand over the same and adjustment of DPC. However, the counsel of complainant states that there is an inordinate delay in handing over of possession, so the complainant wants refund of the paid-up amount as per above complaint already filed before the authority. However, in view of above, she will seek necessary instructions from the complainant/allottee if she wishes to continue in project and claim DPC along with possession or not and will file an application for amendment of relief if complainant/allottee wishes to do so within a period of 10 days. Order Reserved. Matter to come up on 03.08.2023 for pronouncement of orders.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 18MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Order not pronounced  as the counsel for the respondent is placing on record a copy of order passed by Hon’ble Tribunal in appeal No.280/2020 wherein  the due date of possession has been held as 27.11.2018 and as per own submission of the complainant,  the due date is mentioned as 27.11.2018 only. The counsel for the complainant states that there has been number of email requests seeking refund before the above dates and no deduction of earnest money can be made and  no refund was made by the respondent. He is  drawing attention towards para No.53 of page 159. The counsel for the complainant is placing on record a copy of order passed by the authority in CR No.3876 of 2021 wherein para No.45 the refund has been allowed with interest from the date of each payment. Both the counsel for the parties are directed to file written submissions within a period of 15 days with an advance copy to each other. Matter to come  up on 06.07.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 20APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint has been filed on 06.04.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent was filed on 30.08.2022. Succinct facts of the case as per complaint and annexures are as under: S. N. Particulars Details 1.        Name and location of the project “The Corridors” at sector 67A, Gurgaon, Haryana 2.        Nature of the project Group Housing Colony 3.        Project area 37.5125 acres 4.        DTCP license no.                    05 of 2013 dated 21.02.2013 valid upto 20.02.2021 5.        Name of licensee M/s Precision Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and 5 others 6.        RERA Registered/ not registered Registered Registered in 3 phases Vide 378 of 2017 dated 07.12.2017(Phase 1) Vide 377 of 2017 dated 07.12.2017 (Phase 2) Vide 379 of 2017 dated 07.12.2017 (Phase 3) Validity Status 30.06.2020 (for phase 1 and 2) 31.12.2023 (for phase 3) 7.        Unit no. 804,8th Floor, C-11 Tower (page no. 51 of complaint) 8.        Unit area admeasuring 1295.78 sq. ft. (page no. 51 of complaint) 9.        Date of approval of building plan 23.07.2013 (annexure R5 on page no. 56 of reply) 10.   Date of allotment 12.08.2013 (annexure R-2 on page no. 50 of reply) 11.   Date of environment clearance 12.12.2013 (annexure R-6 on page no. 64 of reply) 12.   Date of buyer’s agreement 10.07.2014 (page no. 48 of complaint) 13.   Date of fire scheme approval 27.11.2014 (annexure R-8 on page no. 76 of reply) 14.   Due date of possession 23.01.2017 (calculated from the date of approval of building plans) Note: Grace Period is not allowed. 15.   Termination notice 03.10.2018 (page no. 107 of complaint) 16.   Possession clause   13. Possession and Holding Charges Subject to force majeure, as defined herein and further subject to the Allottee having complied with all its obligations under the terms and conditions of this Agreement and not having default under any provisions of this Agreement but not limited to the timely payment of all dues and charges including the total sale consideration, registration chares, stamp duty and other charges and also subject to the allottee having complied with all the formalities or documentation as prescribed by the company, the company proposes to offer the possession of the said apartment to the allottee within a period of 42 months from the date of approval of building plans and/or fulfillment of the preconditions imposed thereunder(Commitment Period). The Allottee further agrees and understands that the company shall additionally be entitled to a period of 180 days (Grace Period), after the expiry of the said commitment period to allow for unforeseen delays beyond the reasonable control of the Company. (Emphasis supplied) 17.   Total sale consideration Rs. 1,36,32,699/- [as per payment plan on page no. 43 of complaint] Rs. 1,48,72,213/- [as per statement of account on page no. 169 of complaint] 18.   Amount paid by the complainants Rs. 1,34,30,236/- [as per statement of account on page no. 169 of complaint] 19.   Occupation certificate 27.01.2022 (annexure R-11 on page no. 81 of reply) 20.   Offer of possession 16.02.2022 (annexure R-12 on page no. 84 of reply) The complainant has sought following relief: 1.     Refund the entire amount of Rs. 1,34,20,791/- paid by the complainant to the respondent since 25.03.2013. 2.     Interest at the rate of MCLR +2% from the date of each payment till the date of refund.  The complainant has booked the residential apartment in the project named as ‘The Corridors’ situated at sector 67 A for a total sale consideration of Rs. 1,36,32,699/- out of which it has made payment of Rs. 1,34,30,236/-.  The complainant was allotted the above-mentioned unit vide allotment letter dated 12.08.2013. The apartment buyer agreement was executed between the parties on 10.07.2014. As per possession clause 13 of the builder buyer agreement the possession of the unit was to be handed over within 42 months from the date of approval of building plans or fulfillment of preconditions imposed thereunder. The due date for handing over of possession comes out to be 23.01.2017 calculated from the date of approval of building plans. The complainant on 03.10.2018 sent an email to respondent and stated that “I would like to exit the investment. Kindly confirm the total amount payable back to me along with interest on the same and timeline by when you can issue the refund.” Further the complainant sent various emails on 22.11.2018, 04.02.2019, 25.04.2021, 09.05.2021, 20.06.2021, 08.10.2021, 26.07.2021 seeking refund of his paid-up amount. The counsel for the complainant has placed on record a copy of the order passed by the authority in CR No.3876 of 2021 wherein full refund has been allowed with interest and requests for a similar relief for the above complaint  as well since after the due date, the complainant-allottee has been requesting for refund vide various e-mails  since 3.10.2018 followed by  several reminders.     However, the counsel for the respondent states that the above complaint in CR No.3876 of 2021 was filed before obtaining occupation certificate of the above project which has been received on 27.1.2022 while the instant complaint has been filed  on 6.4.2022 after receipt of  occupation certificate  The counsel for the respondent draws attention of the authority towards orders passed by DTCP as issued vide Memo No.17537 dated 7.10.2020 (annexure R-13) where it has been held that the delay is due to various litigations and hence requests that the complainant be directed to take the possession which has already been offered  after obtaining occupation certificate.  However, the counsel for the complainant starts that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of above respondent and in the same project, has already held the right of the complainant to seek refund with interest and he is seeking the same relief. ( As per Para 31 of the orders). Arguments heard. Order reserved. Matter to come up on 18.5.2023 for pronouncement of orders.

    Stage: RESERVED

  • 25JAN 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint has been filed on 06.04.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent was filed on 30.08.2022. Matter could not be heard today due to paucity of time. Matter to come up on 20.4.2023   for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24JAN 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    MATTER TO COME UP ON 25.01.2023 FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 11NOV 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 06.04.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 30.08.2022. The reply of the respondent has been received by the complainant who however has not yet been paid the cost of Rs.5,000/- imposed by the authority for delay in filing of the reply.  The counsel for the respondent states that the demand draft for requisite cost has already been submitted in the registry of the authority  which may be collected from the registry of the authority. The complainant is directed to collect the demand draft from the registry of the authority. Matter to come up on 24.01.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10AUG 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 06.04.2022 and registered as complaint no. 1524 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant had sent copy of complaint through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint made to the respondent is submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority also sent a notice to the respondent along with a copy of the complaint through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 09.04.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email on the following email addresses i.e., [email protected], and [email protected]  and the same is shown to have delivered on the above email addresses as per the report available in the file.  It is proper service of the notice.          Written reply not filed by the respondent. The counsel for the complainant states at bar that there is a delay of about 4 years in the project and the complainant has been seeking refund through various emails since 2018  but there is no response from the respondent-builder. The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply. Respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 24.08.2022 in the registry of the authority with cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainant for delay in filing the reply. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of the respondent may be struck off.                            Matter to come up on 11.11.2022 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (11)