VINAY VATS vs BPTP LIMITED

HARERA GURUGRAIV BEFORE THE ComplaintNo.

178of 2020 HARYANA REAL ESTATE REGUIJTTORY AUTHORITY, GURUGRAM 778 of 2OZ0 Firstdat€ ofhearinsr 03_o2.2/l20 05.01.2023 r. rr" p,"."n, "o-pr",Gl.lf,llJGRAMl,n,n,r",,o*" unr". section 31 ofthe Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Acr, 2016 (in short, the Act) read with rule 2SoftheHaryana Real Estate (Regutationand Development) Rules, 2017 (in short, the Rules) for violation of section 11(4Xa) of the Act whereln it is irier alio prcscribed that the promoter shal be responsible lor all obligations, responsibiltfies and functions under the R/o: - House no.83, Sector-4o, curugraln-l22002.

1.

M/s BPTP Limited.

2.

M/s Countrywide Pr Regd.

Office at: M- Circus.

New Delhi-1 ,td.

CORAII4: ShriViiav Kumar co Shri Ashok SanEwan APPEARANCE: Advocatetorthe comDlainant Sh.

Harshit Baba Ior the resDondenrs Complainant Connaught *HARERA S-eunuennu Complarnt No.

178 ofl020 provision oftheActorthe Rulesand regulatlons made there under or to the allottees as per ihe agreement for sale executed irter se, A" Unlt and proiect Elated detalls 2.

Th€ particulars of unit details, sale consideration, the amount paid by the complainanl date ofproposed handing over the possession, delay period, if an, have been detailed in the following tabular form: m Park Lite", Sector- 57, Nature otproj RERA Regis Registered ase no.25 ofcomplaintl Ddte of execution o llate of AllotmentLette [As per page no.

13 ofcomplaint) Clause 13 ofAllotme.t l€tter.

That Company small endeavor to complete the construction oi the said bu,lding /shop/office Space/unit within a p€riod of 36 months from the date of san.tionins of the s.N.

Details 1.

3.

NotRegistered 7_ FPL.1O 8.

9.

10.

1}HARERA Sarnucmv B.

Fnctsofthe.omplaint Comp a nrNo 178ofJ0lO The complainant has made the following submissions in the complalnt: 3. plalnt: 3.

That somewhere around 2009, th€ respondents advertised about a proiect namely "BPTP Freedom Park Life" [herelnafter called as pro,ect') located at Sectors7, District Gurugram- The complainant visited the project site and believing the representations, in October 2009, booked building plan and commencementof constructlon th€reafter sub,ect to force maleure and timely paymenr by the lntending Allottee(s) oi sate price, stamp dury and other charges due and payable according to the Payment plan applicable to him or as demanded by 11.

Date of approval of buildingplans 12.

Due date otpossession € Rs.

37 ,77 ,714 /- replyl 13.

Total sal. conrideration 14. 'l'otal anrount paid hy rhe Rs.29,45,164/- IPase no.

103 olreply] 15.

Occupat,on dated replyl 0ffer of possession \'.,1 A H 11.03.201t; (Annexure R 14 on pase 101 of r.pl_r,l Complairt No.

178 of 2O2O !}HPII?ERA lS- egnuennr,r F".,pr"- ll"r,s "r ,o,o'-- one shop in the said prorect by paying an amoubt of RS.2,74OSO/- towards the booking ofthe satd shop to the respondents.

That thereafte., on 26.10.2009, rhe respondenrs sent an allorment letter thereby allotting one shop bearing no. ,FpL-10, admeasuring 283 sq. ft. super area.

Thereafter, the complainant made a payment of alinost 75% ti 2010 in accordance with the dehands raised by the rcspondents.

That subsequent ro paying more th_aFg5p6 of rhe totat constderarion amount, the comptainant ih lanuary ro.r r.ffi *".".rondents to execure rhe buye/s agreement and to.914ffirrq,t t"rsely assuring rhe rormer ll::ffi :::"p"-W;$i,\,,unn"l*,.".*" .W#* #:iT::'*ffiffffiffi[:""":#; threatened the comptainant ro cancel the allorment and forfeit endre money upon his failure to make fur&er payments.

Havtng no other oprion, the complalnant again made further paymenr of Rs.

6,53, 432 / - on 3O.OS.2O7Z.

O.OS.2O7Z.

That thereafter, the complatnant in December, 2012 and in March 2013 again approached the respondents to execute the agre€ment and inquinng as to when possesston would be handed ove. as mor€ than 95% payment 8. ? +. ffU\RERA !P- Gunucmu Complaint No.

178otJ02U had already been made, but all in lain as the representatives of the respondents compaly simply reorsed from giving a concrete repl, and the complainant was always given vague and misleadlng assurances on one occasion or the other.

That to add to the misery of the complatnant, in the year 20 14, he came to knowthatthe unirsit€ inquesHon has been subject to disputeslnce 2012, and litigat,on was pending w.r.t. the same in Hon,ble High Court of puniab and Haryana vide cwP no.

222+3 of 2$!ffi$ffie hnd in question was a part of parkrng area! and rccordingly, tcould not be sold by the builder.

This left the complainant completely aghast and devastated.

As soon as rhe complainant came to know about the said fact, he immediately rushed ro the respondent seeking retund oihis money, butagain to no avait. r0. rhat on 2l.rz.zo19, LS way of mail again requested the respondcnts to either handover posscssion or ro return back his nronev a..l \., also expressed hts anguish)f,f tion at the hands of builder l:T:::::T;r:T.*IH.ffi ,-JT"HH:fl ::T:::: or re comprarnant. 'GL[tl.JGR;"il ;;"*;;;;,;" Eeachery and misconduct on the pan of respondents.

11.

That it is pertinent to mendofl here rhat the respondent did not have rhe rcquisite approvals to build shops on the land in quesdon as the same land forms a part of parkilg ar€a which is a part of common ar€as and despite ImowinS this, the respondent deliberately concealed the same from the complainaot.

Rather upon Inquiry, the comptainant was assured that the fftnnrne (* ounuemH,l ConplaintNo, 178of 2020 respondent has obtained all necessary government approvals and not only this,the fact thatrhe said landwas already subi€ct to lihgation had also been concealed bythe res bythe respondenL Irhas been speciflcalty ordered by the Hon,ble Puniab and Haryana High Court vide order dated 25.11.2014 in CWp no.

22243 of 2012 that f\rrJl,er sale of any common ar€a shal be subject ro rhe outcome of writ petition.

This clearly lhows that the land was a part of the common areas and could not have be ld and apparently, this seems to be the reason why respondent did not he buyer's ag.eemenr with the complainant tor the unit in quejti 12.

Thatthe present compla on 3l readwirh Section 18(11in order ro seek r by the complarnant at h f Rs.29.45.464 /. paid scribed as per RERA, 2016 and HRERA Rule payment till the date o financjal, mental as well as physical 1 d by the complainant due to receipt of each installment of i with compensation for rhe ifl{has notonrvbeen reft e-DeIehJ or escatation otprice 13.

The comp)ainant cannot be expected to wait €ndlessly for the comptetjon of the project.

Hence, the comptainant has preferred the present complaint for refund at a prescribed rate of interest.

C.

Rellcfsoughrbytb€complainant: The complainant has sought folowing relief(s). nc$ ,201 ff|AIERA SP, ounuenav complarntNo.

178of 2020 building plan and commencement of construction thereafter sub,ect to force maieure and timely payment by the lntending Alloftee[s) ol sal€ price, stamp duty and other charges due and payable according to the Payment Plan applicable to him or as demanded by B.

Facts ofthe complaint Thecomplainant has made the following subnissions in the complaint;- 3.

That somewhere around 2009, th€ respondents advertised about a new proiect namely "BPTP Freedom Park L,fe" (hereinafter called as 'the prolect') located at Sector-s7, DisMct Gurugram.

The complainanr visited the proiect site and believing the represenrarions, in October 2009, booked Date of approval of buildinsplans m Du e date of po ssession Totalsale considerati nt Rs.37,17,rt4/- ro.

103 of reply) Rs.

29,45,4 Occupation no.78 oireplyl ure R-14 on page 10l ofreply) 11.

12.

13.

74- 15. '16. {}HARERA S-ounuenau i.

Direct the respondent to refund the entire amount paid by the complainant along with prescribed rate ofinterest. ii.

Direct the respondent to give Rs.

5,00,000/- as comp€nsation on account of loss/tnjury as well as mental agony sullered by the complainant iii.

Directthe respondentto pay titigation charges ro thetune otRs.40,000/, D.

Reply by th€ respondenrsl 14.

That the complainan! in making due dilisence a accepting rhe rer ["Booking Form" U€d Li 009, on his own volition, after understanding, agreeing and plication ior atlorment ,a1 Parl n8 mercial shop in the alr!

Haryana of the signed applrcanon Ms Countrywide prom constituted the r€spondenr 15.

That vide altotment cum demand lener dated 26.10.2009, the complainant herein was duly altotted shop no.

FpL l0 renrahvely admeasuring 283 4 sq. ft. super area.

As per the agreed paymenr scheduleademand for,within 60 days ofbooking. was also raised atrhe tim€ of allormenr by the respondent payable by 06.11.2009. tt js submitted that the comptainantfailed to remit rhecalled amountwithin ooking by subnritting rhr duty ng amount. tr is submitted rhat ffEARERA 9[ ounuemr,l on01.05.2010 It is further submi$ed that Letter on 09.06.2011 to receipt dated 30.

That in 2012 a f 2012 was filed by n against the Srate ot Haryana (beinC on & Haryana.

1n rhe said writ th *:::l'*""'ffARffft**'"ved pran (a) s'i,'i *" ***^ "*2{T Tff isf2-qr Kkin{p'feosq (b) rhe a[onees rave arso reen chirtlal [&hllid,ll6,6*bVJr tr,o"u ,,""". rt ** averred that the sdlted area had be€n co[verred inro shops and B/mnasium etc and instead of two, only one basement was constructed, even in that very less space has been left for parkjllg purpose.

18.

0n08.11.2012,theHon'bteHighCourtof puniab& Haryanapassedan order in the interim directing the respondents to not create any third_ party interest in the shops etc consrructed in the stitt area and turther ComplarntNo. mplarntNo. t78otlO2O the stlpulated time period and made part payments on 10.02.2010.

In turn, the respondents were forced to issue a reminder letter dated 22.02.2010 requesting the complainantto ctear the outstanding.

It was after issuance ofthe said reminder letter that h€ made part payments 16. issuance of lasr and final opporrunity the outstanding paymenrs, the romplainantmadepartpa .06.2011.

Thereafter, they issued another last and finat er on 14.03.20t2 and post aymenq accordingly and 17 before the High Court otpunjab rm Park Life Residents Weltare HARERA GURUGRA[4 cofrplarnrNo.

178of 2020 at least fiee parking should be provtded forone car, to each allon€e in the open area now being used forparking tt is reiterated that rhe shop in question is not in the common area ofthe group housing and is duly approvedin thesite plan dated 23.07.2008.

19.

As perthe agreedtermsof thebookingform, twocopies of lpacebuyer,s agreement were sent to the complainant on 14.03.2013 for €xecurion.

It is submitted that the complainant has rill date failed to return the agreement to the responden ecution.

The respondenr vide reminder letters dated 19.08.2013, 18.09.2013 and 18.10.2013 requesred the complai the outstanding dues.

However, he failed to .lear the sam, ent were left witb no 20 That in CWP No.

22243 of 2012, the Hon'ble Hish Court ol Punjab & Haryana on 25.11.2014 modified its interim order as passed on 08.11.2012 and observed as under: ''Itrthet sole ofant connon orco to the residehLt sholl be subpct to thtl decision althewritpetitioh The buildns lat out plan, il necessorJ to bt! nadtfed in Juttre, sholt be tevsed n terns ol the poltc! t)ote.t 2A.01.2013".

That post.€ceipt ofOC olTower F on 12.07.2010 olthe project freedom park life in which the shop in question is located, possession of shop 21. u *HARERA $ eunuennr,r FPL-09 admeasuring 314 sq. ft was offered ro the complainant on 11.03.2015.

1.03.2015.

It is pertinent to point oLrt tha! tn the said offer of possession, it was clearly srated thatas $e unitwas Iocated in the stilt area, though the part of FAR for which all rhe government fees and charges havebeen paid at the commercjat rare by rhe respondents bui th€ conveyance deed, possesston and usage ofrhe unitand parking area shall be subiecr to final or(jotr!,flf ANp no.22243 of 2012, pending belore rhe Hon,ble High Court ofpunjab & Haryana.

22.

Thars,nce(he(omptarn the dues and take possess,on, inder vide email dated 23.r 1.2015 requ executed.

In the by20.11.2016.Itjs anthas however, farted to pay the vAT charges ous outstanding d ues.

Contenpt of Couns Act, 1971 by alteging vjotation of order dated 08.11.2012 passed by the High Court in CWp No.2Z 243 of ZOt2.

The Hon'ble High Counon 30.03.2017 observed as foltowsr "Perusat ol the .aodl @eak thot ind@d on opphcotton wos noved by the r4ponrlehts lot vacorion of the sto, order br nentioned the aloredentioned Ioctt an.t it was undet thee cirtuhstance!" the order daad oatl2!12 tuo. -'edrterms of th e booking aorm, rYSTn os.1 1.2016 payabre ffHARERA 9!- eunuonnM during the opmti@ ol order doted 08,11.2012" 24.

It ls the humbte submissions of the respondent allotmentfortheunit jnquestionweredonepriorto the respondenrs had leAalt lly accepted allotted the unit in question ( mplainant and has not viotated order's passed by Hon in tl_ sard CWP.

25.

That vide emaits .2017, the respondents with respect to VAT demand immedi 26.

Thar, thereafter, o othent etc, hos been do.e to &e con.*ned pottiq tn the,Eor 2010.

The dotunetu Anndurc p-3 oht, confrn the sid alotnent b, hahdins ovet of po$eteon M@ning her.br, no ohenoti@ hos been done b, the tgp@d B nodifed.

A Ntubt ol the d@uME Annexure R-1/1 to R-t/3 are reveab thot that booking and 08.11.2012.

Thus, the booking and lfare Association fited the posssion ol the petitione. and @w has cme to his knowte.lge" 27.

That vide emails dated t2.10.2O17 and 1E.05. and 1E.05.2018, the respondent again reminded the conplainantto clear pending dues with respect to yAT demand immediatety, but despite issuance of repeared reminder emails, the complainant faited to clear the pending dues HARERA GURUGRAM Copies of all the retevant documents have been filed and placed on the record.

Theiraurhenriciryh not in djsprite.

Henre, the comptaint can be decided on the basis ofthese undisputed docunents and submissions made by the parties.

D. ,urlsdlcton ofthe authortty 29.

The aurhorfty has complered relritorjal and subject matter iurjsdictioh to adjudicate the pres€nr complatut for the reasons given below.

Ter.itoriat iurisdictio D,I l0 Town and Counrry planning Department, Haryana, the jurisdiction of Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authoriry, Gurugram sha be enrire Gumg.am district fo. aI pu.poses.

In the presenr case, the project in question is situated withjn the plannnrg area ot Cu.ugram clistnct.

As per norification no.1/g2/2017-1TCp dared 14.12.2017 issued bv Thereiore, this authoriry has complete terriror,al jurisdjction to deal with thepresent complainr. reproduced as hereunder: (4) The pmhotet sho - !:-!,!: :seoBtlte totut .obt,satbn, k,ponsibtttt ts ond hn<ldn, utu-er rhe pnitN oI thk Act ot the tules and r.gutations node .nerend.r _d to rhe_atbft@, as per the agre.hent lot ete, ot to he a,\wbtion ofolottees,6 the.o noy be_ n ie conwroht. ot ol thp aporthe\\ ptots or buildhgr_ 6 the .a* aar be, to the 31. :w,::"::;w::i"T,y:;d*",,@n.ra,b;at,hc S.c.ion 3l-F cdons ol h.

Aurhodtyl 34A oI the Ad prcvt.l$ to qsurc cohDha i,;,, " ry1,1" o-.*".. a" .ii;;;. ;;ii;: :!"i:,*!::::X; ... uhoet ahAct on.t th. rutesond ruputotioa, hod;;;";;;#,"- rz. so, rn view ofrheprovisions orthe A"ct quo;ed abou".-*" rr,r,*i,y r,r, complete jurisdicrion to decide the complaint regardin8 non- compliarce of oblgations by the promoter Ieaving aside compensation which is to be decided by the adjudicaring officer il pursued by ihe complainant at a Iater stage. ter stage.

33.

Further. rhe au(hori eeding wjrh rhe complaint matter in view ot rhe judgement pass Newtech Prornoters u ndOrs- SCC Ontine SC 1044 de.id as been iaid down as ol whn h a J, tutt, r tt L t, n,, 1t.1td er of udtud\ rtton d, ha.oL d a t. tt, :::i,:i:::.o:, t::: tq. @d !.dj,lcotitva@."a *.t t,.,,i *,t" qt " r:;ii;iiw{w{w'i#, i"t::if!!!iii{:;;!,::"":;yr:::triiy,i,iiiiii:::,::n 'i::!i!;;::!":w#!,:"'i:;ri;ii:i;i;il{:;:::iii {if iii,Mtiii{##i1;f i:tiul;,,:* fiq.\oqed_ tt e,knded ro the ddjua"at,ne on.e, o" p,o,[i,or.,n ou, vt?w. not tnrend tu e.xpa4d the oabn and ,ope oJ ;he powe^ ond U\RERA GUl?UGl?AIV *HARERA {t- eunuemu l::::y:.:[:!e odiid@t:ns one, under seetoa zt ond thot woutd De agahst the non.tore oI he A$ 201^,, 34.

Hence, ilt view of rhe authoritative pronour€ehent ot the Hon,ble Supreme CoLrrt in rhe matter of ttt/s Newtech promoters ond Developers mvatz Limtted Vs State of U.p. anit Ors. tsupm) the authority has the,urisdiction to enrerrajn a comptajntseeking refund oi theamountand intereston the refund amounr E, Findings on the.etief sou E.I Direct the responden by them from th/-i ;::i#T:'ffi mplalMnt sale consideration received along wtth pr€s.ribed lnterest.

35.

The complainan \-6\ p bearing no.

FpL-10 u.."r"u.,n* rt{# nt ot Rs.29,45,464/- 05/-.lN rheyear 2014, site in quesrjon has beeh z0r2 and the'@Ll{Rt G{+}fi71r n*u"s *e", -a accordlngly, it coutd notbesotd by the bu,lder. tt rs pertinent ro nention here that it has been specifically ordered by the Hon,ble punjab a.d HarFoa High Court vid€ order dated 2 S.1 1.2014 tn CWp no.

22243 of 2012 that further sate of any cohmon area shalt be subjecr to rhe outcome ofthewdtpetition.

This clearly shows rhat theiandwas a parr ofthecommonarea and could not have been sotd and apparently, this HARERA GUl?UGMIV seens to be the rcason aSreement, why respondent did nor execute rhe buyers 36. buyers 36.

The counsel for the respondent submitted rhat provisions ot shops in theshltportion was approved by DTCP in revised buildingplans in the year 2008 and subsequentty an occupahon cenificate has been obtained from DTCP vide memo no.

3662 dared 12.07.2010.

It is also strted rh.r the oc granted b DTCP atso peftains ro rhe shops 1 dwelling units inctudes rhp subtecrshopsas wejj and constructed unde. the above P was offered to rhe 015- clearly stated th deed, possession and p e subject to Rnatourcome of CWP no.22243 of 2012, pendnrg before th. iion,bte l{igh Couri ol Punjab & Hn.yana. < . l r ll. pr.\ent, v npti ht tt e, omDtujndnt :ntc.rdr lo w.tn,r.is. tr, .r, U c prolect sincethe legatstatus ofthe uniris nor clearand is seek,ng return of the amount paid by him in respect ofsubject apanment along with interest at the prescribed rate as provided under sect,on 18(1) oithe Act.

Section 18(11oftheActis reproduced belowtor ready refer€nce. "Szcd@ 10: - Eerum oI onowt onil @peMaion said offer of possession , it was rcated inthesrjttarea, though the rent fees and charSes have been ffHARERA 9? ounuemrrr 18(tl f the pronod laih b cohDteb ., ^ on opotnenr_ plot ot buildtns. !] "l ll "i: !:.!!: :,y : :, to lh. a l l o ttee' i h c d s e th e a l o lE e w i s h ^ ?":;:Ji::; !ff ::,y::: -,^.;;';;;;;;;;?: :;' :::;r." ; l:1; iiti:ll;ii :# :..: i::.y :: ::, ;; ;; ; ;;' ;, ; ;" i ;:, :; :;; :, opottmena ptot, buitding, os ho! be. th interestot such nannet os provided und.r )n.ludtng.o pensotnn h the Provtded thot where on 38.

Funher rn the ju ::,,:ii;:,:;::::,:tr;;;"*,i!iif "::,#i;!";;:,***,^" ";:"';:;,:;";'x:,:":::;^!::;",x;.::::!:ffi .;::;::::j e Loun o ndra rn rhe te Limited ys state of ana Reakors private Civil)No.1300sof2020 I rohphihtNo.lTSof2o2o l unobh to give posysnon oI \r\intend b withdtaw hoh th. ?{{ffi[r::zr:i:t:!:fl?, decided on 12.0s.2022.

2s rtihqio$edithtoI.he.lafteet *tk rctutu rekr..tt und{ se..ar ta(])kt)o,tls..tion 1et4) olthe A.t R notdep.ndent oD au.orhq.

D au.orhq.r.i\ ppears hot th. jegblatur? hos cons.iausLr ,n denonll as an uhconditionol obsotua right :-: :|or* rk' eruno@ Io'|ts ro sie. posiin ottt. opafu..1 ptol buitdhs ndL th. dn ,.tprhed undi rr. ,ltus ol k" osp.q.4l rAodh$ ol hltuen qq1 o ,ro, otd?A ot 1. counnnbLnot, uhi.h " tn..tth.t wot i addbrdbt. t th.allod?e/hohebuy.t,dt?pm ok, t, un rer@obtbad t rcfundth.anoqton denondvihtntustotthe rcte ptanibed b! th.

Sto.?

[email protected] k.tu.ting @p.@tion in aE honn* phvided undet ti.

Ad wtth rt. ptuviso dtut iI d1e alh6@ .loe, hot vsn b .al and Ors. fsu ted & othery *HARERA !t eunuonnM wirhdrow tnd th. ptuial h. ,hau * _no"o iiiiil__- deto! ntl hond,as ow p@aoh ", ";;; ;;::::'*'^""'"' ", by him i.e., Rs 29,45,{64l-wirh interest at the rate of 10.60% (the State Bank of rndta h tshest mar".a&;l ,:, , ^ - ,.

39.

The authority is of view that the allottee cal for makin' a !€rid offer ofpo.""""ion "no u"ono' b" expected endressry for which subsrantiat cons,r".",,"" ";";;;;;j;.",l.,,;:ff :.Tn] authortty hereby directs the promorers to re$rrn rhe amount recejved 3s on dare+2%) as prescrib (Regulation and Dev PrYmenttillthea s 40.

Admissibitity o p.a.

Howeve, alloE; or tendinB rate (t4CLRl appt,cabte le 15 ofthe Haryana Reat Estate 7 from rhe dare of each ntwithrn the nmeirnes ro rvuhdraw trom the projeft ard rs seeking retund of the amount paid by h,m In respe( or rhe subied u.ll wrth inrerest ft prescribed rate as provided under rute 15 ot ttre n,tcs Rule 15 has been reproduced as undei: *!;!"';#;!,!i1i:fr !!,;x:ii{,17;;;;;3;."**..," ,-, , ", !t( purpore ol pro s?c\aas t4t a.d;.t .i *;;":-;':".::, ':,,'"n to ond .ub. ii,i;:,ff .;i;i,yYa;;';;;;i;;";i;i:::;:,,i,:;,'.Zi: y#;;l::{frf i#:iyi::i!i"!i_ii:i;t rate oftnterest: The y ir at the rare of 18% #HRnmn e ounuor*qrvr I .",d;, - , ,. ""r, I 41.

The legistature in its wisdom in the sr:tord' provrsion or.ure 1s orthe.

1s orthe.","" r"" r""il::j:1'j:":"jr::i::",:: inrerest The rate of interest so deterrnir reasonabreand ifthe said rt te is rottowea tot by the legisraturq is ensure uniform practice in ar the cases. award the in."rest, it witl 42.

Consequently, as per website of rhe State Bank of India the marainal ofjending rate (in shorr MCI,R) interest wilt be marS,nal ordingly, the prescflbed rnre 43.

Accordingly, the no rte +204 r.e..

10.60 o/0. l It4ttal read o ate contained in secrion oll the part of the lainant is entitled to i.e., @ L0.6OVo p.a. cribed rate ofinteresr feach sLrrn rilt irs actual ofthe Act read with rute RERA 44.

Hence, the authority hereby passes this ord(rr and issues the folowing directions Lrnder section 37 of rrre Act to ensure ."rrr;;; "; obligations casr upon rhe promoteras per rhe function entrusted to the authoriry under se(ion 34(0: i.

The respondent/promoters are direded to retund the endre anoLrnt of Rs.

29,45,464/-paid by the comptaihanr atong with 1) of EARTNN GURU6l?AiV Fiie be consisned to re,i (Ashok,6a' N.r€|nb Hary prescribed rate of inreres, o ro.eo* p_ i-,r,u iIi"j payneht tiil the actual date of refund ofthe deposited amounr from the date of this order as per provisions of the A., read with mre 1s or,r".;;";;;;-" "'"""tio, 18[1) or ii.

A period of90 days is given to the respondents ro compiy with rhe directions giveh in rhis order and failing which tegat conseq uen ces wou Id foltow.

Comptaint srands disposed of 45.

46.

Dared:0S.01.202 7c eI #'9 HARERA GURUGRAM Lr\Q!#;.e# 1*il,.,I!IT' *l