HARERA THROUGH NEERAJ GAUTAM vs SIGNATURE INFRABUILD PVT. LTD.

Ar. Neeraj Gautam (Associate Architectural Executive) briefed the facts of the case. Sh. Vedant Batra (CS) and Sh. Ravinder (Executive) appeared on behalf of the promoter. He states that the promoter had applied for the requisite clearances on time but the delay was on the part of the concerned department. However, it is not disputed that the promoter was granted conditional registration at its own accord and depositing of security amount in the form of cheque in lieu of submission of the requisite clearances within the time specified in the conditional registration. It was clearly mentioned in the registration certificate that this guarantee shall be forfeited by the Authority in case the promoter fails to submit the approved service plans and estimates within the stipulated time. In view of the fact that the promoter has failed to submit the approval of service plans and estimates within the specified timeline of three months as per conditions of the registration certificate no. 664/396/2023/08 dated 13.01.2023, the security deposited by the promoter in lieu of the timely submission of the above approval is hereby forfeited. The matter stands disposed of.

Matter is adjourned to 22.03.2024.

Proceedings dated 23.11.2023 Ar. Neeraj Gautam (Associate Architectural Executive) briefed the facts of the case. The Authority is in the process of framing guidelines/Regulation to deal with cases of delayed compliance. The above matter shall be dealt according to the decision of the Authority in this regard. Till then, the proceedings may be kept pending. The matter to come up on 29.02.2024.