GURMEET SINGH THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF SHRI GURMEET SINGH vs RAMPRASTHA ESTATES PVT. LTD.
Party Details
- GURMEET SINGH THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF SHRI GURMEET SINGH
- RAMPRASTHA ESTATES PVT. LTD.
Case Summary
GURMEET SINGH THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF SHRI GURMEET SINGH filed Case No. RERA-GRG-7513-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against RAMPRASTHA ESTATES PVT. LTD.. The case has undergone 4 hearings over 9 months. The case is currently pending. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (4)
- 31JAN 2024Hearing
Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN
Order pronounced. The present complaint was filed on 01.12.2023 and reply on behalf of the respondent was received on 25.07.2023. The complainant has stated that the matter was earlier settled between the parties vide settlement agreement dated 05.01.2021 and an order had been passed on 29.01.2021 in CR No.3357/2020, wherein the complaint was ordered to be disposed as per terms and conditions mentioned in the settlement agreement. However, the respondent has failed to adhere to the conditions of the settlement agreement specifically in para no. 2C wherein it was agreed that the offer of possession of the plot shall be made by June 2022. As per record, the complainant has settled all his claims in terms of the settlement agreement dated 05.01.2021 filed before the Authority in CR. Nos. 3355/2020, 3355/2020,3345/2020 and 3342/2020 vide which the respondent has paid a sum of Rs.7 Lakhs per plot to the complainant as compensation for delay in handing over possession till the period of 31.12.2020. The respondent has further agreed to pay the delay possession charges w.e.f. 01.01.2021 till the date of offer of possession of the plots, as per the clause of buyer’s agreement at the time of offer of possession, which was agreed to be offered by June,2022. Accordingly, the above-mentioned complaint was disposed of by the Authority vide order dated 29.01.2021 in terms and conditions mentioned in the settlement agreement. It was further stated that report of the mediation forum, statement on oath recorded by both the parties before the mediation forum and settlement agreement and all other relevant documents shall form a part of the record and be consigned to the registry alongwith case file. The matter has already been disposed of by the Authority in terms of settlement agreement filed before it as well as statement recorded to that effect by the parties. Therefore, if any party fails to abide by the terms and conditions mentioned therein, then the same shall be enforced by the executing court as provided under Section 40 of the Act of 2016 read with rule 27 of the Haryana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, in such manner as may be prescribed. Thus, in view of the above, the present complaint stands dismissed being not maintainable. The parties are free to approach the executing authority if they so desire. File be consigned to the registry.
Stage: DISMISSED
- 25OCT 2023Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
The present complaint was filed on 01.12.2023 and reply on behalf of the respondent was received on 25.07.2023.The complainant has come before this authority stating that the matter was earlier settlement between the parties vide settlement agreement dated 05.01.2021 and an order had been passed on 29.01.2021 in CR No.3342/2020 wherein the complaint was ordered to be disposed as per terms and conditions mentioned in the settlement agreement. It was further stated that report of the mediation forum, statement on oath recorded by both the parties before the mediation forum and settlement agreement and all other relevant documents shall form a part of the record and be consigned to the registry alongwith case file. However, the respondent has failed to adhere to the conditions of the settlement agreement specifically in para No.2C wherein it was agreed that the offer of possession of the plot shall be made by June 2022. Further, the counsel for the complainant states that similar matters have been decided in CR No.1228 of 2022 decided on 13.01.2023 titled as Mr.Krishan Kumar Goel versus M/s Ramprastha Estate Pvt. Ltd.The counsel for the respondent states that the main counsel is not available today to argue the matter and seeks a short adjournment. The matter is pending since December 2022 and the complainant cannot be made to wait for justice indefinitely.In view of the above, the respondent is directed to submit written arguments within a period of 3 weeks with an advance copy to the complainant.Order reserved.Matter to come up on 31.01.2024 for pronouncement of order.
Stage: RESERVED
- 19JUL 2023Hearing
Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN
The present complaint was filed on 01.12.2022 and registered as complaint no. 7513 of 2022. On the last date of hearing Sh. Navneet Kumar Advocate, appeared on behalf of the respondent and requests for a sought short adjournment for filing of reply. The said request was allowed, and the respondent was directed to file the reply within two weeks i.e., 26.04.2023, in the registry of the authority with a cost of Rs.5,000/- shall be paid to the complainant. Previous costs paid by the counsel for the respondent to the counsel for the complainant today. The counsel for the respondent requests that they may be allowed to file reply in the registry of the authority tomorrow itself. The respondents are directed to file the reply within the registry of the authority within a period of two days failing which defence of the respondent shall be struck off. Matter to come up on 25.10.2023 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
Orders (5)
- 31JAN 2024judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 31JAN 2024orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 25OCT 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
ff HARERA *&* eunuenRira HARYANA REAI.
ESIATE REGUTATORY AUIHORITY GURUGRAM ERqrutt {-{q-{r frtrqrro crtrfi"I, {sqrq ftfrs atis ,rror"lffaPr New PWO Rest House, Civil !ines, Gurugram' Haryana Day and Date PnoCgEotttCS OF THE DAY Wednesday and 31.01 2024 cR/757312022 VS Ramprastha Case titled as Gurmeet Singh Developers Private Limited Gurmeet Singh Shri Yogesh Kumar Advocate Ramprastha Developers Private Limited N one 25.70.202311AJL.2023 Naresh Kumari and HR Mehta l l Proceedings-cum-order Order pronounced.
The present complaint was filed on 01 12 2023 and reply on behalf of the respondent was received on 25.07,2023' The complainant has stated that the matter was earlier settled between the parties vide settlement agreement dated 05 01 2021 and an order had been passed on 29.01.2021 in CR No .3257 /2020'wierein the complaint was ordered to be disposed as Der terms and conditions mentioned in the settlement agreement However' the ;:#";;;'#t;-*a io 'an"t" to the conditions of the seftlement asreement specifically in para no.
2C whereln it was agreed that the offer of possession of the plot shall be made bY tune 2022' As per record, the complainant has settled all his claims in terms of the settlement ;ilil* ;;; os oi zoz ' rtr:d !:r:': ,'h" i:ii::' :^::"l1)1';.'3,1i'll3ll "i*r!-rr*t ,".'r,ot to the complainant as compensation for delay in handing over ;t:;r,lin.titi;.;;"riod of 31 i2,2020 rhe reipondent has further asreed to pav the delay possession .t "tg"' * " t Of Of ZoZf tiit tt'" date of offer of possession o[ the otots, as per the clause ot buyer's agreement at the time of offer of possesston' ;;':ffi;;;;Jio u" orre'"a' uv lun'e'2022 Accordinglv' the above-mentioned ."-ri","irrur" attposed ofbv the euthoritv vide or<rer dated-2?:3i"'"'"'lllJ,"iili Complaint No.
Complainant Represented through Respondent Respondent RePresented Last date of hearing Proceeding Recorded bY H#i#}j'#'#;";ii; ioiiii "i' zit *t'o nn" ''oo' 17 * HARER,. * HARER,.
S* eunuonnvt HARYANA REAT ESIAIE REGUTAIORY AUTHORITY GURUGRAM ERqrqr T-tic-{r Ashok Sa Mem 37.01.2 - 'un" a-o' ntq* fi4r, 'F-'RE1j!ryryqSTI New PWD Resl House, Civil Line5, Gurugram' Har ;ffiil;;;;;;;. lni '"ti't,n"nt asreement and all other relevant documents ,niii"rn,,l or., "tthe record and be cJnsigned to the registry alongwith case file' The matter has already been disposed of by the Authority in terms of settlement ,".""*"ii ftf"a before it as well as statement recorded to that effect by the parties +fl";f"*. ,'i;;r;;.ty ruirt to 'uia" tv the terms and conditions mentioned therein ;# ;;;;;;i;, ul "nro""a uv tt.'i "*ec'ting cou't as p'ovided under sectron 40 of the Act of 2016 read with rule 2i oi,t " H-r.yun" Real Estate (Regulation and il;i#;ii;;r,lorz, in "'t' 'n"nner as mav be prescribed' ThuS, in view of the above, the present complaint Stands dismissed being not maintainable.
The parties "r" t.""'io approach the executing authority if they so desire.
File be consigned to the registry l EW-2