Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

HARERA GURUGRAM THROUGH PRACHI SINGH vs SOLUTREAN BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-8118-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing7 Aug 2024
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • HARERA GURUGRAM THROUGH PRACHI SINGH
Respondent
  • SOLUTREAN BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED

Case Summary

HARERA GURUGRAM THROUGH PRACHI SINGH filed Case No. RERA-GRG-8118-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against SOLUTREAN BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED. The case has undergone 7 hearings over 1 year and 7 months. The case was disposed of on 7 Aug 2024. 7 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (7)

  • 7AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Counsel for the respondent appeared and submitted the revised affidavit for which they were directed. A clear and legible copy of the application for permission of OC is also submitted, which is dated September 26, 2016. The same is taken on record. The matter was already disposed of once, but there was a direction for review of the file; hence, after reviewing the file and placing on record the affidavit/undertaking of the promoter, the matter stands disposed of as of now

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 3JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Present Mr. Shubham Dayma, Advocate for Chintels India Pvt. Ltd. appeared and requested two weeks’ time to file final approval of BIP and to appear for argument on 07.08.2024 at 11A.M.   Present Mr. Surender Kumar (Manager) and Ms. Harsha (Manager) appeared and filed copy of deed as directed vide proceedings dated 29.05.2024 to prove that ATS Kocoon is part of Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP which is in NCLT. Reply needs to be examined.   Present Proxy Counsel Chahat Arya on behalf of Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd and filed revised affidavit that they shall apply for registration prior to selling but authority is of view that, since Building plans of commercial component are already approved, the promoters must apply for registration with in 20 days. Further it is noticed from affidavit that OC of project (Chintels Caladium) Sector 109, Gurugram was registered on 08.11.2017 which is after that date of coming into force of the Act of 2017. Hence, they are directed to apply for registration of project as it was an ongoing project as on date of implementation of RERA. They must apply for registration within 20 days and to show cause as to why penalty proceedings u/s 59 should not be initiated and why penalty for non-registration should not be imposed as OC received on 08.11.2017 was not an OC received prior to act coming in force as fire NOC was received by promoters on 10.10.2017. Matter to come for further proceedings on 07.08.2024 at 11 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 29MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Advocate Rishi Gujral and Advocate Chahat Arya  appeared on behalf of Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. Proxy Advocate Harshita Tyagi appeared on behalf of Advocate Charu Sangwan of M/s Chintels India Ltd Sh. Rajeev Gupta (Senior Vice President) and Sh. Narender Kumar (Manager) appeared on behalf of ATS Infrastructure Ltd and Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP Counsel for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd is directed to file the revised affidavit declaring that they shall obtain registration of commercial component prior to creation of third-party rights and sale of said project. AR of ATS Infrastructure Ltd  states that Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP is in NCLT. Therefore, they are directed to file the copy of deed filed at the time of registration of Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP to clarify the link between both the companies. Proxy counsel for Chintel India Ltd request for adjournment of hearing. They are further directed to file the copy of final approval of BIP if any received from DTCP, Haryana against the in-principal  approval of BIP which they had received on 11-04-2016. Matter to come up on 03-07-2024 at 10:30 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 15MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Advocate Rishi Gujral and Advocate Chahat Arya  on behalf of Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. None appeared on behalf of Chintels India Ltd Ms. Harsha Vats (Manager) and Sh. Narender Kumar (Manager) appeared on behalf of ATS Infrastructure Ltd and Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP   As per proceeding dated 25-04-2024, M/s Chintel India Ltd was directed to submit the copy of final approval of BIP if any received from DTCP, Haryana against the in-principal  approval of BIP which they had received on 11-04-2016 but the status of the same has not been submitted till date. On the request of counsel for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd and AR of ATS Infrastructure Ltd  (Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP), matter adjourned to 29-05-2024 at 10:30 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 25APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Advocate Rishi Gujral and Advocate Chahat Arya  on behalf of Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. Sh. Shubham Dayma (Advocate) on behalf of Chintels India Ltd Sh. Rajeev Gupta (Senior Vice President) and Sh. Narender Kumar (General Manager)  appeared on behalf of ATS Infrastructure Ltd and Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP   AR of M/s ATS Infrastructure Ltd and Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP states that there is no evidence held on record of OC of convenient shopping, which is a part of pocket B, part of license no. 13 of 2011. The license holder of the said license is M/s Chintel India Ltd, and developer of pocket B is M/s Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. AR further states that there is a clerical error in the reply filed by /s ATS Infrastructure Ltd where the area of pocket A was mentioned as 10.768 acres instead of 12.21225 acres which is as per the clause 7 of JDA dated 16-05-2011 and the area of Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd is 3.6687 acres which is mentioned as smaller project land and the same is also known as pocket B as per the approved building plan. On the last date of hearing, counsel for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd was directed to supply copy of the reply submitted in the authority to M/s  Chintels India Ltd. counsel for M/s Chintels India Ltd states that they have received the copy of reply yesterday and seeks one week time to file the reply to the same. Request is allowed. They shall file the reply within 10 days after supplying the copy of the same to Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. Also, counsel for M/s Chintels India Ltd is hereby finally directed to submit the copy of final approval of BIP if any received from DTCP, Haryana against the in-principal  approval of BIP which they had received on 11-04-2016. Counsel for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd states that they have not sold even a single unit of the convenient shopping of the total project land area measuring 3.668 acres and that they have not created any third-party rights so far as the commercial part of the project is concerned. They are directed to file the affidavit with regard to the same. As regards the residential units, he submits that OC was applied on 26-09-2016 and obtained on 08-11-2017. Counsel for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd requests for a copy of reply earlier filed by M/s Chintel India Ltd in the authority. Copy to be supplied by M/s Chintel India Ltd to Counsel for Solutrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. Matter to come up on 15-05-2024 at 10:30 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 3APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Ms. Chahat Arya (Proxy Advocate on behalf of Ms. Rishi Gujral) in Soultrean building Technologies Pvt Ltd. Sh. Shubham Dayma (Advocate) on behalf of Chintels India Ltd. None appeared on behalf of ATS Infrastructure Ltd None appeared on behalf of Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP Final opportunity of hearing is given to the promoters to explain the entire status of license no. 13 of 2011 granted by DTCP, Haryana against which a JDA was signed on 16-05-2011 between M/s Chintels India Ltd and Umritha Infrastructure Development LLP. Counsel on behalf of M/s Chintels India Ltd states that they had applied for change of BIP on 25-01-2016 and 05-02-2016 for which in-principle approval was granted by DTCP on 11-04-2016 subject to certain conditions which was to be complied within 90 days but nothing is held on record regarding the actual beneficiary of the project inspite of giving several opportunities of hearing and to explain that whether the final approval has been received or not. Further, it has came to the notice of the authority during proceedings that one  more JDA was signed between M/s Chintels India Ltd and M/s Soultrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd  for area measuring 3.668 acres as stated by the proxy counsel on behalf of M/s Soultrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd and they had submitted the reply today itself with respect to the project land under JDA. Counsel for M/s Chintels India Ltd request for a copy of reply filed by Soultrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd. Therefore, the proxy counsel for Soultrean Building Technologies Pvt Ltd is hereby directed to supply one copy of  their reply to M/s Chintels India Ltd. Matter to come up on 25-04-2024 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 4JAN 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Matter to come up on 03-04-2024 at 10:00 A.M.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (7)