Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

MR RAM NIWAS YADAV AND MR ABHISHEK YADAV vs MS VSR INFRATECH PVT LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-13-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing28 May 2025
Court⚖️ Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) ↗
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MR RAM NIWAS YADAV AND MR ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondent
  • MS VSR INFRATECH PVT LTD

Case Summary

MR RAM NIWAS YADAV AND MR ABHISHEK YADAV filed Case No. RERA-GRG-13-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against MS VSR INFRATECH PVT LTD. The case has undergone 10 hearings over 2 years. The case is currently pending. 11 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (10)

  • 28MAY 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter is disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 9APR 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter to come up on  28.05.2025 for final arguments in case the matter is not settled between the parties.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 22JAN 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was received on 05.01.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 18.05.2022. The counsel for the respondent states that the matter is under settlement and seeks adjournment to file the settlement deed. Matter to come up on 09.04.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 13NOV 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was received on 05.01.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 18.05.2022. Both the counsels for the parties state at bar that settlement talks  between the parties are in progress and request for a short adjournment. Request is allowed.  It shall be the last opportunity. Matter to come up  on 22.01.2025 for filing settlement deed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 4SEP 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was received on 05.01.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 18.05.2022. Both the counsels for the parties have stated at bar that settlement talks are going on between the parties and request for a short adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 13.11.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 29MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was received on 05.01.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 18.05.2022. Both the counsels for the parties state at bar that settlement talks are going on between the parties and request for a short adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 04.09.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 27MAR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was received on 05.01.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 18.05.2022. Both the counsels for the parties state at bar that settlement talks are going  on between the parties and request for a short adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 29.05.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 3JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was received on 05.01.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 18.05.2022. Both the counsels for the parties have stated at bar that settlement talks are going on between the parties and request for a short adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to  come up on 27.03.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 11OCT 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment to argue the matter and the counsel for the complainant has no objection to it. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 03.01.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 17MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The  present complaint was filed on 05.01.2023 and registered as complaint No. 13 of 2023. The counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of the reply to the counsel for the complainant during proceedings and requests for filing the same in the registry of the authority. The respondent is directed to file reply within a week in the registry failing which cost of Rs.5,000/- shall be imposed upon the respondent. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off. Matter to come up on 11.10.2023  for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (11)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

HARERA GURUGRAM HARYANA REAI ESTATE REGUI.AIORY AUIHORITY GURUGRAM efur"n t-*iqo ftF{qrro crff6{q.

15{rq PROCEEDINGS OF THE DAY WednesdaY and 28.05.2025 C-R11r3 /2023 Case titled as Ram Niwas Y"a VS VSR Infratech Private Limi(ed Day and Date Complaint No.

Ram Niwas Yadav Complainant Shri Harish Yadav ProxY counsel VSR Infratech Private Limited Represented through Respondent Respondent RePresented Last date ofhearing Proceeding Recorded bY New PWD Re5t House, Civil Line3, Gurugram' 8aryana Ms.

Smriti Srivastava proxy counsel 09.04.2025 Naresh Kumari and HR Mehta Proceedings-cum'order The Darties have arrived at an amicable settlement and a copy of settlement ilffi"d ttbiroii to ttris effea has been ptaced on record by the counsel for the respondent which is duly signed by both the parties' In view of the above, the matter stands disposed off in terms o[ settlement deed.

File be consigned to the registry' Ashok Sa Me 2A.05.2 ffiarropm.nr' ' /r"b "' '""'"" "i:,il d;;'nr aro rtao. rora*r t'i' r&' rtft "t. $n'-

Similar Cases

⚖️
SMT RAJ BALA KADIAN vs AMD ESTATES PVT. LTD.
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)RERA-PKL2023PENDING
⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs PRIYADARSHI KUMAR
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)H-REAT2019PENDING
⚖️
RAJIV KUMAR CHAUHAN vs MS BPTP LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)RERA-PKL2021PENDING
⚖️
BPTP LIMITED vs AKSHITA SHARMA
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)H-REAT2019PENDING
⚖️
SANJAY KUMAR vs GEO CONNECT LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)RERA-PKL2023PENDING