Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

NIDHI REKHAN vs SAMYAK PROJECTS PVT LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-4425-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing6 Aug 2025
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • NIDHI REKHAN
Respondent
  • SAMYAK PROJECTS PVT LTD

Case Summary

NIDHI REKHAN filed Case No. RERA-GRG-4425-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against SAMYAK PROJECTS PVT LTD. The case has undergone 12 hearings over 1 year and 6 months. The case is currently pending. 13 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (12)

  • 6AUG 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 9JUL 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Order reserved. Matter to come up on 06.08.2025 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: RESERVED

  • 7MAY 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter to come up on 09.07.2025 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 5MAR 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter to come up on 07.05.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 29JAN 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 29.09.2023 and a reply on behalf of respondent no. 2 was received by the Authority on 04.09.2024, even though the defense of the respondents was struck off by the Authority during its hearing dated 29.05.2024. Further, an application dated 19.11.2024 had been filed by the counsel for respondent no. 1 under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC, 1908 for setting aside the ex-parte order dated 29.05.2024. Proof of service of this application has been filed by respondent no. 1 dated 16.01.2025.  The counsel for the complainant wishes to file a reply to the application filed by the respondent No.1 for setting aside of exparte proceedings. The same may be filed within a period of one week with an advance copy to the respondents. Matter to come up on 05.03.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 18DEC 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 29.09.2023 and a reply on behalf of the respondent no. 2 was received by the Authority on 04.09.2024, despite the fact that the defense of the respondents was struck off by the Authority during its hearing dated 29.05.2024. Further, an application dated 19.11.2024 had been filed by the counsel for respondent no. 1 under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC, 1908 for setting aside the ex-parte order dated 29.05.2024. The counsel for the complainant wishes to file reply to the aforesaid application which may be done within a period of one week with an advance copy to the respondent. Matter to come up on 29.01.2025  for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 13NOV 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 29.09.2023 and a reply on behalf of the respondents had not been received till date. The defense of the respondents was struck off during the last hearing dated 29.05.2024. However, vide last hearing dated 04.09.2024, the counsel for respondent no. 2 apprised the Authority that reply could not be filed due to some confusion in similarly numbered cases and therefore, the respondent no. 2 was granted an opportunity to file the reply in the interest of justice. Shri Shanker Wig Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent  No.1 today and filed power of attorney during proceedings and requests for 2 weeks time to file an application of setting aside the exparte order. The counsel for the complainant vehemently objects to the request of counsel for R1.        The authority considers it expedient to allow the counsel for R1 to file the application as requested within a period of 2 weeks in the interest of justice. The same may be filed within the time provided with an advance  copy to the counsel for the complainant. Matter to come up on 18.12.2024   for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 4SEP 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 29.09.2023 and a reply on behalf of the respondents had not been received till date. Therefore, the defense of the respondents was struck off during the last hearing dated 29.05.2024. The proxy counsel for the respondent No.2 states that reply could not be filed due to confusion in similarly numbered cases.  Therefore,  the respondent No.2 may be granted an opportunity to file a reply today itself.  Allowed in the interest of justice. Matter to come up on 13.11.2024 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 29MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 29.09.2023 and a reply on behalf of the respondent has not been filed till date. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent.  Despite giving opportunities to the respondent to file reply the same has not been filed till date. In view of the above, the defence of the respondent is hereby struck off. Matter to come up on 04.09.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 3APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 29.09.2023 and reply on behalf of the respondent has not been filed till date. During the last hearing dated 02.02.2024, the learned counsel for complainant submitted that there are chances of settlement between the parties and therefore requested that the complaint be listed before the Authority on 03.04.2024 for further proceedings. The counsel for the complainant seeks adjournment to file settlement deed. Matter to come up on 29.5.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 2FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Despite calls none appeared on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for complainant submitted that there are chances of settlement in between the parties so case may be listed before the authority on 03.04.2024 (on which date other matters listed). Accordingly, now case is listed before the authority on 03.04.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 12JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Present complaint filed on behalf of complainant on 29.09.2023. As per postal tracking report ED487571747IN (respondent no.1) and ED487571628IN (respondent no. 2) copy of complaint was sent to the respondents on 23.09.2023 and premises of respondent no. 1 was found locked and item was on hold on the door locked of respondent no. 1 and that post was duly delivered to respondent no. 2 on 25.09.2023. Registry of the authority also sent notice along with copy of complaint on 03.10.2023 to both the respondents on their following email address: [email protected] and [email protected] Despite several calls none appeared on behalf of the respondent. Now the case is adjourned for 02.02.2024 for appearance of respondent and for filing reply on behalf of respondent subject to last opportunity.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (13)