Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

PARESH CHANDRA DAS AND SHIPRA DAS vs RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-335-2024
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing13 Feb 2025
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2024

Party Details

Petitioner
  • PARESH CHANDRA DAS AND SHIPRA DAS
Respondent
  • RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

Case Summary

PARESH CHANDRA DAS AND SHIPRA DAS filed Case No. RERA-GRG-335-2024 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.. The case has undergone 8 hearings over 10 months. The case is currently pending. 9 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (8)

  • 13FEB 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter is disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 6FEB 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Since the Hon’ble Member is on leave, hence, the matter is adjourned to 13.02.2025 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 12DEC 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 02.02.2024 and reply was received on 02.07.2024.   Succinct of the facts are as under: S. No. Particulars Details 1. Name of the project “Primera”, Sector 37D, Village Gadauli Kalan, Gurugram, Haryana 2. Project area 13.156 acres 3. Nature of the project Group housing colony 4. DTCP license no. and validity status 12 of 2009 dated 21.05.2009 Valid up to 20.05.2024  5. Name of licensee Ramprastha Realtor Pvt. Ltd. 6. RERA Registered/ not registered Registered vide no. no. 21 of 2018 dated 23.10.2018 for an area of 3.257 acres Valid up to 31.03.2020 7. Date of approval of building plans 25.04.2013 (As per information obtained by planning branch) 8. Unit no. 203, 2nd floor (Page no. 30 of complaint) 9. Unit admeasuring 1720 sq. ft. (Page no. 30 of complaint) 12. Date of execution of apartment buyer’s agreement 04.10.2013 (Page no. 25 of the complaint) 13. Possession clause 15. POSSESSION (a) Time of handing over the Possession Subject to terms of this Clause and subject to the Allottee having complied with all the terms and condition of this Agreement and the Application, and not being in default under any of the provisions of this Agreement and compliance with all provisions, formalities, documentation etc., as prescribed by the DEVELOPER, the DEVELOPER shall endeavor to complete the construction of the Said Apartment within a period of 54 months from the date of approval of Building Plans by the office of DGTCP. The Allottee agrees and understands that the DEVELOPER shall be entitled to a grace period of hundred and twenty days (120) days, for applying and obtaining the occupation certificate in respect of the Group Housing Complex. (Emphasis supplied) (Page no. 66 of the complaint) 14. Due date of possession 23.02.2018 (calculated by the 54 months from approval of building plans i.e., 25.04.2013 including grace period) 15. Total sale consideration Rs.1,08,22,863/- (As per buyer’s agreement on page no. 30 of complaint) 16. Amount paid by the complainant Rs.92,24,687/- (page 62 of complaint) 17. Occupation certificate /Completion certificate 05.04.2023 (as per DTCP site) 18. Offer of possession 31.12.2023 (email dated 31.12.2023 page 63 of complaint) The complainants have sought following relief(s): 1.     Direct the respondent to pay delay possession charges. 2.     Direct the respondent not to ask for any other charges which was not the part of BBA. 3.     Direct the respondent that above charges be adjusted in final due payment. The counsel for the complainant requests for allowing DPC as physical possession has not been handed over despite repeated follow up and seeks relief for handing over of possession along with execution of CD. Arguments heard. Order reserved. Both the parties may file brief written submissions within 3 weeks after supplying a copy of the same to each other. Matter to come up on 06.02.2025 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: RESERVED

  • 26SEP 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The counsel for the respondent states that an email dated 08.04.2024 has been sent for offering possession of the unit to the complainant and assures to hand over the possession of the unit to the complainant.   Further,  the counsel assures to amicably settle the matter and seeks an adjournment. One opportunity is given for exploring the settlement failing which arguments shall be heard on merits.   Matter to come up on 12.12.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 27AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Cost of Rs. 15,000/- paid to the learned counsel for the complainant through UPI on 27.08.2024. As the pleadings are complete so the matter is listed before the Authority on 26.09.2024 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 22AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Reply filed by the respondent in the registry on 02.07.2024 taken on record. Cost of Rs. 15,000/- (as per order dated 30.05.2024) not paid by the respondent. Adjournment requested. Now the case is adjourned for 27.08.2024 for payment of cost of Rs. 15,000/, subject to last opportunity.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 30MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Fresh Memorandum of appearance filed on behalf of the respondent by Sh. Divyanshu Kumar Advocate. As per order dated 28.03.2024 respondent was allowed to file reply within three weeks of the order failing which with cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid to the complainant. Admittedly till today neither reply filed by the respondent nor cost paid. Adjournment requested on behalf of respondent no. 1 for filing reply. Now the case is adjourned for 22.08.2024.                 Respondent is allowed to file reply within three weeks of this order with additional cost of Rs. 10,000/- (total 15,000/-), in the registry with advance copy to the complainant.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 28MAR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Memorandum of appearance filed on behalf of the respondent. Reply not filed. Adjournment requested. Now the case is adjourned for 30.05.2024. Respondent is hereby directed to file reply within three weeks of this order,  in the registry with advance copy to the complainant , failing which with  cost of Rs. 5000/- to be paid to the complaint.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (9)