Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

HAKEEM AAFAQ MANZOOR vs SONI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-5044-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing24 Sept 2025
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • HAKEEM AAFAQ MANZOOR
Respondent
  • SONI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Case Summary

HAKEEM AAFAQ MANZOOR filed Case No. RERA-GRG-5044-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against SONI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED. The case has undergone 13 hearings over 2 years and 11 months. The case is currently pending. 14 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (13)

  • 24SEP 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter stands disposed of. File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 6AUG 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter to come up on 24.09.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 2JUL 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter to come up on 06.08.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 16APR 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Matter to come up on  02.07.2025 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 5FEB 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 18.07.2022 and reply on behalf of the respondents has not been filed till date. The defense of the respondents has been struck of vide order dated 07.02.2024 and cost of Rs. 5,000/- imposed on respondents vide order dated 08.11.2023 has also not been paid. Vide last order dated 01.05.2024, the Authority decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondents. The proxy counsel for the complainant seeks a short adjournment as the arguing counsel is not available today.    The proxy counsel for the respondent for R1 states that CIRP has been initiated against the respondent-company and places on record an order dated 27.04.2022 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CA No.7534 of 2021 titled as Anand Murti vs. Soni Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and another and further states that  litigation is pending in the matter. Matter to come up on 16.04.2025 for further proceedings. Meanwhile, the  complainant is directed to clarify the relief being sought in the matter as  both refund as well as DPC have been mentioned in the relief sought in the complaint.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6NOV 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Since the Hon’ble Member is on leave,  hence, the matter is adjourned to 05.02.2025 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 21AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 18.07.2022 and reply on behalf of the respondents has not been filed till date. The defense of the respondents has been struck of vide order dated 07.02.2024 and cost of Rs. 5,000/- imposed on respondents vide order dated 08.11.2023 has also not been paid. Vide last order dated 01.05.2024, the Authority decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondents. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the parties. One last and final opportunity is being granted to the parties to appear and to argue the matter. Matter to come up on 06.11.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 1MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 18.07.2022 and reply on behalf of the respondent has not been filed till date. The defence of the respondent has been struck off vide order dated 07.02.2024 and cost of Rs. 5,000/- imposed on respondent vide order dated 08.11.2023 has also not been paid. None has appeared on behalf of the respondent  and this is the 6th  date of hearing. Sufficient opportunities have been given to the respondent and the matter is pending since July 2022.  In view of the above, the respondent is proceeded against exparte. Matter to come up on 21.08.2024  for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 7FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Despite calls none appeared on behalf of respondent. As per the previous order dated 08.11.2023 respondent was directed to file reply along with cost of R s. 10000/- within 15 days, failing which defence of respondent shall be struck off. Despite the stipulated period, the respondent did not filed reply and also not paid cost of Rs. 10000/-. In continuation of order dated 08.11.2023 defence of respondent struck off. Now the case is listed before the authority on 01.05.2024 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 8NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 18.07.2022 and registered as complaint No. 5044/2022. Written reply not filed by the respondent till date. The case has been pending for a long time, and on the last date of the hearing, a cost of Rs. 10,000/- has already been imposed on the respondent. None appeared on behalf of the respondent. The respondent is directed to file reply within a period of 15 days after supplying a copy to the counsel for the complainant. It is the last opportunity. In case reply is not filed in the allowed period the defence of the respondent shall be struck off. Matter to come up on   7.2.2024  for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 16AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 18.07.2022 and registered as complaint no. 5044 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint made to the respondents were submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority also sent a notice along with a copy of the complaint through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 05.08.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at the following email addresses [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] . On the last date of the effective hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the respondent. None present on behalf of  the respondent. The respondent is  directed to file a reply within two weeks i.e., by 30.08.2023 in the registry with a copy to the complainants subject to costs of Rs.10,000/-, for not complying with the orders of the authority. Last opportunity is being granted. In case, reply is not filed even at this stage within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent shall  be struck off.                Matter to come up on 8.11.2023  for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 22FEB 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 18.07.2022 and registered as complaint no. 5044 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint made to the respondents were submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority also sent a notice along with a copy of the complaint through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 05.08.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at the following email addresses [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] . On the last date of the effective hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the respondent. The respondent is now directed to file a reply within two weeks i.e., by 08.03.2023 in the registry with a copy to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case, reply is not filed even at this stage within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off.        Matter to come up on 16.08.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 20OCT 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 18.07.2022 and registered as complaint no. 5044 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint made to the respondents were submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority also sent a notice along with a copy of the complaint through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 05.08.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at the following email addresses [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] The same is shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file. It is proper service of the notice. However, no reply has been received on behalf of the respondents till date. None is present  on behalf of the respondent. The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 02.11.2022 in the registry with a copy to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondents may be struck off.                 Matter to come up on 22.02.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (14)