Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

DEEPAK SINGH vs CZAR BUILDWELL PVT LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-7929-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing21 Aug 2024
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • DEEPAK SINGH
Respondent
  • CZAR BUILDWELL PVT LTD

Case Summary

DEEPAK SINGH filed Case No. RERA-GRG-7929-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against CZAR BUILDWELL PVT LTD. The case has undergone 7 hearings over 1 year and 1 month. The case is currently pending. 8 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (7)

  • 21AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 21.01.2023 and registered as complaint no. 7929 of 2022. Reply has not been submitted and the defence was struck off on 24.01.2024. Succinct facts as per the complaint and the reply are as follows: S. N. Particulars Details 1. Name of the project “Mahira Homes”, Sector-104, Gurugram, Haryana. 2. Nature of the project Affordable Housing Scheme Project, Multistoried Towers. 3. RERA Registered/ not registered Registered GGM/504/236/2021/72 Dated -25.10.2021 (Valid upto 02.12.2025) 4. DTCP License 66 of 2021 dated 07.09.2021 valid up to 06.09.2026 5. Welcome letter 04.12.2021 (As on page no 10 annexure –C of documents submitted by the complainant) 6. Unit no. T4-2307, Tower-T4 7. Unit area 644 sq.ft. 8 Environment clearance 27.04.2022 (As per website of SEIAA, Haryana) 9. Builder-Buyer’s Agreement  Not available 10. Possession clause In the absence of the agreement under Affordable housing project, the possession clause given under the Affordable Housing Policy 2013 would prevail. Section 1 (iv) of Affordable housing policy 2013 which provides as under : Section 1 (iv) All such projects shall be required to be necessarily completed within 4 years from the approval of building plans or grant of environmental clearance, whichever is later. This date shall be referred to as the date of commencement of project “for purposes of this policy. The license shall not be renewed beyond the said 4 years period from the date of commencement of project. 11 Due date of delivery of  possession 27.04.2026 [Calculated 4 years from the date of E.C] 12. Total sale consideration Rs.26,00,000/- 13. Amount paid by the complainants Rs.1,29,060/- (As per annexure A on page no. 6 of complaint) 14. Occupation certificate /Completion certificate Not obtained 15. Offer of Possession Not offered 16 Request for refund 23.12.2021   Complainant heard in person. The respondent is directed to refund the amount deposited by the complainant alongwith prescribed rate of interest i.e. 11.10% per annum from the date of each payment till its realization.  Cost of Rs.5,000/- shall also be paid alongwith the above amount. Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 1MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 21.01.2023 and registered as complaint no. 7929 of 2022. Reply has not been submitted and the defence was struck off on 24.01.2024. The complainant present in person has handed over  a copy of the affidavit regarding allotment of the unit to the proxy counsel for the respondent during proceedings and had already submitted the copy of the same in the registry of the authority. Matter to come up  on 21.08.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 28FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 20.01.2023 and the reply not submitted till date. Defense of the respondent was struck off on 24.01.2024. The complainant present in person is seeking refund of the amount of Rs. 1,28,470/- paid for allotment of unit under the Affordable Housing Scheme in the project “Mahira Homes 104”.  The allottee states that he was allotted unit No.T4-2307 in the draw of lots by DTCP Haryana.  Thereafter, vide e-mail dated 17.12.2021, the complainant sent request to withdraw from the project . The complainant wishes to place on record the certain documents pertaining to the allotment.  Liberty granted. The documents may be filed within a period of two weeks. To come up on 01.05.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    As per the previous order dated 10.01.2024 the respondent was directed to file reply and to pay cost of Rs. 5000/- failing which defence of respondent shall be struck off. Admittedly the respondent has not filed reply and also not paid cost of Rs. 5000/-. As respondent despite availing sufficient time not filed reply and also not paid cost of Rs. 5000/- so the matter is listed before the authority for 28.02.2024 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    As per the previous order dated 11.10.2023 respondent was directed to file reply in the registry of the authority within a period of 15 days. Till today no reply filed on behalf of respondent. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent. Learned counsels for respondent requested for adjournment which is highly opposed on behalf of complainant. Perusal of case file duly reveals that complaint was filed on 20.01.2023 and on 05.07.2023 case was adjourned for 11.10.2023 with the directions that respondent shall file reply within two weeks i.e. by 19.07.2023 along with cost of Rs. 5000/- to be paid to the complainant. Although there is no justification for grant of further adjournment for filing reply on behalf of respondent but keeping in view repeated request on behalf of respondent, complaint is adjourned for 24.01.2024 for filing reply and payment of cost Rs. 5000/- failing which defence of respondent shall be struck off.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 11OCT 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 20.01.2023 and registered as complaint no. 7929 of 2022.   On the last date of hearing dated 05.07.2023 Shri Rishabh Gupta Advocate was present on behalf of the respondent company and was directed to file the reply within two weeks, i.e., by 19.07.2023 in the registry subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid to the complainant. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of the respondent shall be struck off.  But the respondent failed to comply with the orders of the authority by not filing a written reply within the time allowed. None appeared on behalf of the respondent today. The respondent is again directed to file reply in the registry of the authority within a period of 15 days after supplying a copy to the counsel for the complainant.  In case reply is not filed in the stipulated period, the defence of the respondent shall be struck off.   Matter to come up on 10.1.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 5JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 20.01.2023 and registered as complaint No. 7929 of 2022.  Shri Rishabh Gupta Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent today and filed memo of appearance. Written reply not filed by the respondent.  The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 19.07.2023 in the registry subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainant.  Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of the respondent shall be struck off. Matter to come up on 11.10.2023  for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (8)