SUBHASH GUPTA vs RAMPRASTHA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD
Party Details
- SUBHASH GUPTA
- RAMPRASTHA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD
Case Summary
SUBHASH GUPTA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-1102-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against RAMPRASTHA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. The case has undergone 12 hearings over 2 years and 5 months. The case is currently pending. 13 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (12)
- 22OCT 2024Hearing
Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN
Order pronounced. The respondent is directed to allot and deliver the possession of the booked unit. In case, respondent promoter due to non-availability of plot is not able to allot and offer its possession to the complainant, he will be liable to make available to him a plot of the same size, as booked, specifying the future upcoming project wherein specify plot number shall be provided and execute buyer agreement within a period of 30 days. Further, the respondent is directed to pay delayed possession charges along with prescribed rate of interest i.e. 11.10% per annum from the due date possession i.e. 31.09.2009 for handing over of possession till the offer of possession + 2 months or actual handing over of possession whichever is earlier. Other reliefs shall form part of main order Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.
Stage: DISPOSED
- 15OCT 2024Hearing
Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN
Due to lack of Coram, the matter is adjourned to 22.10.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.
Stage: PENDING
- 13AUG 2024Hearing
Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN
The present complaint was filed on 22.03.2022 and reply on behalf of respondent received on 09.05.2024. The complainant submits that vide receipt dated 31.07.2006, it has paid an amount of Rs.39,00,000/- to the respondent/promoter. The respondent confirmed the amount received and promised the allotment of a plot admeasuring 600 sq. yards. in future potential project located in Gurugram. Thereafter, till date, the respondent has miserably failed to specify the project as well as plot number where 600 sq. yards. has been allotted. The complainant tired of the neglectful behavior of the respondent filed the present complaint pleading for possession of the plot along with delayed possession charges and execute the conveyance deed in favour of the complainant. The counsel for the respondent stated that there is no BBA has been executed between the parties and there is no specified number and block & project has been specified and only a receipt has been issued by it, hence, the complaint is barred in RERA under the provisions of RERA Act as he is not a allottee. The complainant has made booking by paying Rs.39-00 lakh for a future project which is not in existence. However, the counsel for the respondent state that the receipt has been issued by respondent and specifically as area admeasuring 600 sq. yards has been mentioned. Arguments heard. Order reserved. The counsel for the complainant states that cost of Rs.10,000/- has not been paid. The counsel for the respondent states that the same has been paid and shall file the proof of the same. Both the counsels for the parties may file written submissions within 15 days with an advance copy to each other. Matter to come up on 15.10.2024 for pronouncement of order.
Stage: RESERVED
Orders (13)
- 22OCT 2024orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 22OCT 2024judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 15OCT 2024orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A