DINESH NARAYAN BHARADWAJ AND SNEHA BHARADWAJ vs AGRANTE REALITY LTD

The present complaint was received on 10.10.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent has been filed on 18.01.2023. The counsel for the complainant no. 1 and 2 had filed an application dated 25.11.2024 under section 151 CPC read with section 88 of RERA Act along with amended memo of parties. The complainant vide application sought relief of deleting complainant no. 3 from array of parties on the ground that the complainant no.3 is not involved in any relationship with complainant no. 1 and complainant no.2 after divorce by way of mutual consent. The proxy counsel for the respondent is directed to file reply to the aforesaid application alongwith status of the unit and refund request submitted by the complainants way back  in 2014.  A public notice be also published in the newspapers by the complainant intimating the next date of hearing to the remaining allottees. Matter to come up on 03.04.2025 for further proceedings.

The  present complaint was received on 10.10.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent has been filed on 18.01.2023. The proxy counsel for the respondent states that copy of application  filed by the counsel for the complainant for amendment of memo of parties  is not received. The counsel for the complainant is directed to supply a copy of application filed for amended memo of parties for inclusion of name of one of the co allottee to the counsel for the respondent within a period of 10 days who shall file reply within a period of next 15 days after supplying a copy to the counsel for the respondent. Matter to come up on 23.01.2025 for further proceedings.

The present complaint was received on 10.10.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent has been filed on 18.01.2023. The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as the main arguing counsel is not available today due to medical exigency.  The counsel for the respondent states that the complainant is required to file an application for deletion of name of co-allottee No.3 which is not yet filed and one more opportunity is being given to do the needful within 2 weeks. Matter to come up on 07.11.2024 for further proceedings.

The present complaint was received on 10.10.2022 and the reply on behalf of respondent has been filed on 18.01.2023. The complainants have filed an application dated 04.10.2023, under section 151 of CPC read with section 88 of the Act of 2016 with regard to that the co-allottee no. 2 i.e., Sneha Bhardwaj and the co- allottee no. 3 namely Navin Bhardwaj had file a petition for divorce by way of mutual consent and made a joint statement of the co-allottees no. 2&3 dated 09.05.2016, as per the terms of the settlement deed, the allottee no. 3, shall not have any claim with regard to any movable or immovable property either in existence or acquired any time in future or anything inherited by the co-allottee no. 2 i.e., Sneha Bhardwaj. The complainant no. 1 and 2 filed an application dated 19.01.2024, under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 read with section 88 of the Act of 2016 with regard to impaledment of co-allottee no. 3, he is also signatory of the buyer’s agreement along with amended memo of parties.   The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for an adjournment as the counsel for the complainant is not available due to medical exigency.  The copy of the application for impleading the co-allottee with amended memo of parties be supplied to the counsel of the respondent within one week. The respondent may response to the same, if any can be filed in next 2 weeks. Matter to come up on 08.08.2024 for further proceedings.

The present complaint has been received on 10.10.2022. The reply on behalf of respondent has been filed on 18.01.2023. The complainants have filed an application dated 04.10.2023, under section 151 of CPC read with section 88 of the Act of 2016 with regard to that the co-allottee no. 2 i.e., Sneha Bhardwaj and the co- allottee no. 3 namely Navin Bhardwaj had file a petition for divorce by way of mutual consent and made a joint statement of the co-allottees no. 2&3 dated 09.05.2016, as per the terms of the settlement deed, the allottee no. 3, shall not have any claim with regard to any movable or immovable property either in existence or acquired any time in future or anything inherited by the co-allottee no. 2 i.e., Sneha Bhardwaj. The counsel for the complainant states that copy of application for impleading Mr. Naveen Gautam has been supplied to the counsel of the respondent and shall be filing in the registry of the authority within one week. Matter to come up on 25.04.2024 for further proceedings.

Matter is adjourned to 18.01.2024.

The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as the main counsel is out  of station. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 12.10.2023  for further proceedings.

The present complaint was filed on 10.10.2022 and registered as complaint No. 6531 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 18.11.2022  as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file.  Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected] and the same is shown to has not been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file.  It is not proper service of the notice The proxy  counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of the reply to the complainant and requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply in the registry of the authority. The proxy counsel for the respondent has further drawn attention of the authority that the instant unit was allotted to 3 persons while the complaint has been filed only by 2 persons without any authorization of third person and hence, the complainant may do the needful on the next date of hearing.   The name of the company impleaded as respondent is Agrante Developers Pvt. Ltd. while the complaint has been filed against Agrante Reality Pvt. Ltd. and hence, the complainant to file the necessary amendment for correction in the name of the respondent as well as authorization of third allottee of the above unit.  Respondent is also directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 24.01.2023 in the registry of the authority. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off. Matter to come up on 18.05.2023 for further proceedings