Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

DR VINAY GUPTA vs INTERNATIONAL LAND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-2000-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing8 Jan 2026
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • DR VINAY GUPTA
Respondent
  • INTERNATIONAL LAND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

Case Summary

DR VINAY GUPTA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-2000-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against INTERNATIONAL LAND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.. The case has undergone 9 hearings over 3 years and 4 months. The case is currently pending. 11 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (9)

  • 8JAN 2026
    Hearing

    Judge: PHOOL SINGH SAINI

    Matter is dismissed.

    Stage: DISMISSED

  • 8AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 18APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 10.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2000 of 2022. Despite proper service of notice, no written reply has yet been filed. Moreover, the service is also confirmed from the fact that Shri Rishabh Gupta, Advocate is appearing on behalf of the respondent. Vide order dated 06.07.2023, the respondent was given last opportunity to file the reply. On 26.10.2023 the counsel for the respondent had supplied a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant and was directed to submit the reply in the registry today itself (i.e., 26.10.2023). However, till today no reply has been filed by the respondent. The counsel for the respondent states that the project is near completion and resolution plan has already been submitted in the authority . In view of the above,  matter is adjourned to 8.8.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 25JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    Despite specific order dated 26.10.2023, respondent neither filed reply nor paid cost. As respondent availed more than 15-month time for filing reply and has not filed reply and also not paid cost so further opportunity for filing of reply and payment of cost now justified. Now the matter is listed before the authority on 18.04.2024 for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 26OCT 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter is adjourned to 25.01.2024.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The  present complaint was filed on 10.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2000 of 2022. On the last date of hearing, Counsel for the respondent appeared and was directed to file reply in the registry within 2 weeks. However, no reply has been filed till date. The counsel for the respondent states that copy of application filed  for impleadment of  TATA Capital Housing Finance Ltd. has not been served to the respondent and neither the application for correction in the name. Although there is no objection to the correction of name  from “Dr. Vinay Gupta  to Vinay Gupta”.  The proxy counsel clarifies that a copy of the same stands supplied and respondent is in excuse for inordinate delay in filing the reply.   But the main counsel for the complainant is also not available today. Therefore, on the request of counsel of respondent one last opportunity is granted subject to payment of Rs.5000/- as cost to be paid to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case the reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off.        Matter to come up on 26.10.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The Hon’ble Member is on leave, so the matter is adjourned to 06.07.2023  for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 16NOV 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 10.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2000 of 2022. On the last date of hearing, Sh. Pankaj Chandola Advocate, counsel for the respondent appeared and was directed to file reply within 2 days however, no reply has been filed till date. The  proxy counsel for the complainant requests for amendment in the title of the complaint as  Dr. has been unintentionally written before the name of the complainant and has also moved an application for impleadment of  TATA Capital Housing Finance Ltd. as a party. Request is allowed. The notice be served to the new respondent.  The respondents are directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., 30.11.2022 in the registry with a copy to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case the reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of the respondent may be struck off.                      Matter to come up on 06.04.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 9AUG 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 10.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2000 of 2022. As per the records available, complainant has sent a copy of complaint through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint made to the respondent was submitted by the complainant as available in the file. The registry of the authority sent a notice along with a copy of the complaint to the respondent through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 28.05.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at the following email addresses [email protected]  and [email protected]. The same is shown to have been delivered on the above email addresses as per the report available in the file. It is proper service of the notice. However, no reply has been received on behalf of the respondent till date.  The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of the reply.  The respondent is directed to file reply within three weeks i.e., by 30.08.2022 in the registry. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off. Matter to come up on 16.11.2022 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (11)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

PHARERA & ounuennv TIATYANA REAT E5IAiE NEGUTAIOTY AUTIIOIIIY Eitqr"n a-riF{r Fqftqr{d crfufiq. trrrq ,fi.ri,nnfir'6Bt*Ilw,Fm Represenred rhrough Respondenr Represented through Pro(eedrng Recorded by PROCEEDINGS OF TIIE DAY 'lhursday and 08 08 202a CR/2000/2022 Case tirled as Dr.

Cupta VS INTERNATTONAL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED LAN I) INTERNATIONAI, PRIVATE LIlvl lIEl) Shri Rishabh Cupta Advoc:te ShriAjay Sineh Advocate for LAND DEVILOPIJRS forRl R2 18.44.2A24 Naresh Kumari and HR luehta Proceedings cum-orders Both rhe counsels lor rhe pdnies have moved a torn( applkrlrnn tor hrrhd,Jwdl ol rhe compldnt on rhc ground Indr the mar(er hds becn serrted bel\^een rh( In view of the above, the matter srands dismissed as withdrawn l.ite consigned to the registry. be Da) and Dare "\u!*,'ffi", 04.04.2024 &^ tui$;unnninid;6M-itahlReiieiua;;i tbp-ii,,ik, 2oi6 t7