SURENDER KHETARPAL vs INTERNATIONAL LAND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-2484-2022

Date of Filing--

Case TypeRERA-GRG

Last Hearing30 May 2025

Court⚖️ Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) ↗

StateHaryana

CityGurgaon

Year of Filing2022

Petitioner

SURENDER KHETARPAL

Respondent

INTERNATIONAL LAND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

SURENDER KHETARPAL filed Case No. RERA-GRG-2484-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against INTERNATIONAL LAND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.. The case has undergone 12 hearings over 2 years and 9 months. The case is currently pending. 13 orders have been issued in this matter.

30MAY 2025
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
Matter is dismissed in default.
Stage: DISMISSED
20MAR 2025
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
Matter to come up on 30.05.2025 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
6FEB 2025
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
Since the Hon’ble Member is on leave, hence, the matter is adjourned to 20.03.2025 for the purpose as already fixed.
Stage: PENDING
21NOV 2024
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
The present complaint was filed on 22.06.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2484 of 2022. Despite proper service of notice, no written reply has yet been filed. Vide order dated 16.11.2022, the respondent was given last opportunity to file the reply within two weeks i.e., 30.11.2022 along with cost of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant. On 06.07.2023 the counsel for the respondent was again directed to file reply within one week subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- as cost along with previous cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainant failing with further cost of Rs.10,000/- shall be imposed. On 26.10.2023, the copy of reply has been handed over to the counsel for the complainant but not yet filed in the registry. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant. The counsel for the respondent requests for one last opportunity to file the reply and to pay the cost and is filing POA today. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 06.02.2025 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
8AUG 2024
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
The present complaint was filed on 22.06.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2484 of 2022. Despite proper service of notice, no written reply has yet been filed. Moreover, the service is also confirmed from the fact that Sh. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate is appearing on behalf of the respondent. Vide order dated 16.11.2022, the respondent was given last opportunity to file the reply within two weeks i.e., 30.11.2022 along with cost of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant. On 06.07.2023 the counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of reply along with cost of Rs.5,000/- to the counsel for the complainant and was directed to submit the reply in the registry today itself (i.e., 06.07.2023) Thereafter again on 26.10.2023, the counsel for respondent was directed to file the reply within two weeks i.e., 10.11.2023 along with additional cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainants. On last date of hearing, the counsel for the complainant stated that the complainant has not impleaded the 2nd allottee in the array of the parties in the complaint and was directed to file amended memo of parties along with proforma B in the registry of the authority within a period of 15 days. However, no document has been placed on record till date. The counsel for the respondent states that as per directions of Hon’ble NCLAT order dated 31.07.2024 in Company Appl .(AT) (Ins) No.493/2024 has directed to settle all the matters w.r.t the project and the current status will be filed within 4 weeks. Matter to come up on 21.11.2024 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
18APR 2024
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
The present complaint was filed on 22.06.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2484 of 2022. Despite proper service of notice, no written reply has yet been filed. Moreover, the service is also confirmed from the fact that Sh. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate is appearing on behalf of the respondent. Vide order dated 16.11.2022, the respondent was given last opportunity to file the reply within two weeks i.e., 30.11.2022 along with cost of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant. On 06.07.2023 the counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of reply along with cost of Rs.5,000/- to the counsel for the complainant and was directed to submit the reply in the registry today itself (i.e., 06.07.2023) Thereafter again on 26.10.2023, the counsel for respondent was directed to file the reply within two weeks i.e., 10.11.2023 along with additional cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainants. However, till today no reply has been filed by the respondent. The complainant has not impleaded the 2nd allottee in the array of the party in the complaint. Counsel for the complainant is directed to file amended memo of parties alongwith proforma B in the registry of the authority within a period of 15 days with an advance copy to the counsel for the respondent. The counsel for the respondent states that the project is near completion and resolution plan has already been submitted in the authority . In view of the above, matter is adjourned to 8.8.2024 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
25JAN 2024
Hearing
Judge: HARISH GUPTA
Despite specific order dated 26.10.2023, respondent neither filed reply nor paid cost. As respondent availed more than 15-month time for filing reply and has not filed reply and also not paid cost so further opportunity for filing of reply and payment of cost now justified. Now the matter is listed before the authority on 18.04.2024 for final arguments.
Stage: PENDING
26OCT 2023
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
Matter is adjourned to 25.01.2024.
Stage: PENDING
6JUL 2023
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
The present complaint was filed on 22.06.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2484 of 2022. On the last date of hearing, Counsel for the respondent appeared and was directed to file reply in the registry with a cost of Rs. 5000/-within 2 weeks. The counsel for the respondent has filed power of attorney today and requests for filing of reply today itself and a soft copy has been supplied to the counsel for the complainant alongwith cost of Rs.5000/- and assures to hand over the copy to the counsel of the complainant. Matter to come up on 26.10.2023 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
6APR 2023
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
The Hon’ble Member is on leave, so the matter is adjourned to 06.07.2023 for the purpose as already fixed.
Stage: PENDING
16NOV 2022
Hearing
Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA
The present complaint was filed on 22.06.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2484 of 2022. On the last date of hearing, Sh. Pankaj Chandola Advocate, counsel for the respondent appeared and was directed to file reply within 2 days however, no reply has been filed till date. The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of the reply. The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., 30.11.2022 in the registry with an advance copy to the complainant alongwith a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case the reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off. Matter to come up on 06.04.2023 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
9AUG 2022
Hearing
Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
The present complaint was filed on 22.06.2022 and registered as complaint no. 2484 of 2022. As per the records available, complainants have sent a copy of complaint through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint made to the respondent was submitted by the complainants as available in the file. The registry of the authority sent a notice along with a copy of the complaint to the respondent through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 30.06.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at the following email addresses [email protected] and [email protected]. The same is shown to have been delivered on the above email addresses as per the report available in the file. It is proper service of the notice. However, no reply has been received on behalf of the respondent till date. The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of the reply. The respondent is directed to file reply within three weeks i.e., by 30.08.2022 in the registry. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off. Matter to come up on 16.11.2022 for further proceedings.
Stage: FIRST HEARING

30MAY 2025
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
30MAY 2025
judgement
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
20MAR 2025
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
6FEB 2025
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
21NOV 2024
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
8AUG 2024
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
18APR 2024
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
25JAN 2024
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
26OCT 2023
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
6JUL 2023
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
6APR 2023
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
16NOV 2022
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗
9AUG 2022
order
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗

ffiHARER,q ffi- GuRUGRAM HARYANA REAL ESTAIE GURUGRAM REGUTATORY AUTHORTTY ERqrEr T-Tfq-{. frfrqrqm srko.wr, Ts..rrq PROCEEDIN Day and Date Complaint No. a.*,rir"rrt Represented through eil1T4 CR/2484/2022 Case rirled as Sureind Khetarpal and Sangeeta Khetarpal \ International Land Developers priva l,*,",.d Sureinder Khetarpal and Sangeeta Khetarpal GS OT THE DAY Friday and 30.05 .ZOZ| None International Land Developers priva Limited Ms.

Arpita Advocate 20.0'.t.2025 Naresh Kumari and HR Respondent Respondent Represented Last date of hearing Proceeding Recorded by Proceedt The present complaint was filed on 2484 of 2022 and reply was receivr Vide order dated L6.1,L.2022, the re the reply within two weeks i.e., 30.1 complainant.

0n 06.07.2023 the counsel for the along with cost of Rs.5,000/- to t directed to submit the reply in the re was handed over during the procee On hearing dated 1,8.04.2024, the c to implead the 2na allottee in the ar file amended memo of parties alor authority within a period of 15 dayr on record till date. ings-cum-order 22.06.2022 and registered as complaint nr rd on 21.04.2025. sponrlent was given last opportunity to fil L.202,2 along with cost of Rs.5,000/- to th respondent has supplied a copy of repl he counsel for the complainant and wa rgistry today itself [i.e., 06.07 .ZOZ3).A cop dings. ounsel for the complainant sought libert, 'ray of the parties in the complaint and tr rg with proforma B in the registry of th s.

However, no document has been placer New PWD Rest House, Civil Lines, Gurugram Haryana ig sgq-llq5ffiaai$€ 6ftqrun 6 ler VS lte te o. le te v IS v rty to he ed An Authority constituted unde. sectio.,Jo the Rial L"t.t" (R"Crl"tt"" li-rra 1frfua-a 3it{ fuolo yQftcr, zotof,r rrm zot *+r.o and Development) Act, 20 l6 qB-a flfor'{ur ffiHARERii #- eunuennM HARYANA REAt ESIAIE REGUTATORY AUTHORITY GURUGRAM ER'qrurT +kqq-fl ErfqTqs The counsel for the respondent stated that 31..07.2024 in Company Appl. (AT) (tns) No. the maters w.r. aters w.r.t. the projecf and if the ,rtt., heard on merits and the same is listed before The complainant has sought the relief of refund of paid-up amount along with the interest as the ..spond.nt has failed to handover the possession of the unit within the stipulated period and the due date of possession was lapsed way back in 20t6. re ed to of 15 days. the Hon'ble NCLAT order dated 493/2024 has directed to seftle is not settled amicably, it will be Hon'ble NCLAT on 11 .OB.ZOZS. v.l VijayTumar Goyal Member 30.05.2025 In order dated 31,.or.zoz4, it was mentioned that the company appeal under section 7 of the Insorvencyand Bankruptcy code, 201,6 has blen fired by 46 homebuyers before the Hon'ble NCLAT out of which 23 homebuyers have settled their claims amicably, so the Hon'bre NCLAT has directed the respondent to settle the matter amicably with rest of the homebuyers.

The relevant para of the order dated 3L.07.2024 is reproduced below for the ready reference: "Either the appellant has to settle with allthe homebuyers lest the petition uncler Section 7 needs to be disposed of.,, None was present on behalf of the complainant on 0g.0B. zoz4,2L.1,L.zoz4 and again on 20.03.2025 when one last opportunity was granted to the complainant to put in appearance and to iigu" the matte.."Hor.rer, again none is present on behalf of the complainant today.

In view of the above, the complainant is dismissed in default for non-appearance of the complainant and non-joinder of necessary party, despite mritipt. opportunities.

File be consigned to the registry.

An Authority co: rr,"n,t n.,Jo r o-- q-*ra lBfrrrra 3+{ E-6ro rtuftcq, zoroa,r* i8t;.d""';da''# New PWD Rest House, Civil Lines, Gurugram, Haryana a-qt it* file proforma B in the registry of the authoriiy within a However, no document trai ueen prr.ua *'..."'.0 tiil date.