Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

GANESH KUMAR DWIVEDI vs EMAAR MGF LAND LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHER DIRECTORS NOW KNOWN AS EMAAR INDIA LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-6030-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing6 Mar 2025
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • GANESH KUMAR DWIVEDI
Respondent
  • EMAAR MGF LAND LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHER DIRECTORS NOW KNOWN AS EMAAR INDIA LIMITED

Case Summary

GANESH KUMAR DWIVEDI filed Case No. RERA-GRG-6030-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against EMAAR MGF LAND LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHER DIRECTORS NOW KNOWN AS EMAAR INDIA LIMITED. The case has undergone 10 hearings over 2 years and 3 months. The case is currently pending. 11 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (10)

  • 6MAR 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 21NOV 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 06.09.2022 and registered as complaint no. 6030 of 2022 and the respondent has filed reply to the present complaint on 29.11.2022. The counsel for both the parties state that settlement talks are going on and at final stage of settlement.  In view of the same, the counsels request for an adjournment to file the settlement deed, if matter is amicably resolved.  Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 06.03.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 28OCT 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    File taken up today as 31.10.2024  has been declared holiday on account of Diwali festival,  hence, the matter is adjourned to 21.11.2024  for the  purpose  already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 25JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 06.09.2022 and registered as complaint no. 6030 of 2022 and the respondent has filed reply to the present complaint on 29.11.2022. On hearing dated 15.02.2024, the counsel for both the parties sought adjournment to explore the possibility of amicable settlement. During proceedings,  the counsel for both the parties state  at bar that settlement talks are on advance stage and seek  a short adjournment to file the settlement deed. Matter to come up on 31.10.2024  for further proceedings

    Stage: PENDING

  • 9MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Since the Presiding Member is on leave, hence, the matter is adjourned to 25.07.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 15FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The counsels for the parties seeks a short adjournment to explore the possibility of amicable settlement.  Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 09.05.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 7DEC 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The Presiding Member is on leave . Matter is adjourned to 15.02.2024 for the purpose already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 21SEP 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Both the counsel states at bar that the settlement talks to amicably settle the matter is under progress and seeks short adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 7.12.2023 for further proceedings

    Stage: PENDING

  • 27APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The  counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as settlement talks are in progress with the respondent and matter is likely to be amicably settled.   Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 21.09.2023  for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24NOV 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 06.09.2022 and registered as complaint no. 6030 of 2022. As per the registry, complainants had sent copy of complaint through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint made to the respondent is submitted by the complainants as available in the file. The registry of the authority also sent a notice to the respondent along with a copy of the complaint through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 20.10.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email on the following email addresses i.e., [email protected], and the same is shown to have delivered on the above email addresses as per the report available in the file.  It is proper service of the notice.          Written reply not filed by the respondent. Counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply. Respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 08.12.2022 in the registry of the authority. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of the respondent may be struck off. Matter to come up on 27.04.2023    for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (11)