SONAL GULATI vs MAGIC EYE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD

The proxy counsel for the complainant states that on instructions of the complainant allottee,  the relief for handing over of physical possession is not being pressed for the time being and is seeking commitment charges as already decided by the Authority in other project.  An application to this effect be filed within a period of 2 weeks with an advance copy to the respondent and requests for an adjournment to argue the matter. Matter to come up on 20.03.2025 for further proceedings.

The present complaint has been received on 17.08.2023 and registered as complaint no. 3602 of 2023 and reply on behalf of respondent was received on 14.12.2023. On last date of hearing, the counsel for the complainant stated that although a conveyance deed has been executed but the possession of the unit is not yet handed over to the complainant and the unit has been further leased to a third party and no lease rentals are being paid and neither the complainant is a confirming party to the lease. The counsel for the complainant requests for physical hand over of possession which is not yet handed over and neither any commitment charges on leasing out of the unit  by the respondent are being paid. Therefore, the complainant requests for physical possession and till same,  the commitment charges be got paid. Since while filing the complaint, relief of physical possession has not been sought and hence, to amend the relief an application be filed by the complainant after supplying a copy of the same to the respondent.   The counsel for the respondent states that  a subsequent proposal through letter dated 04.10.2021  has been agreed between the parties and the charges have been paid in terms of said letter. Matter to come up on 09.01.2025 for further proceedings.

The present complaint has been received on 17.08.2023 and registered as complaint no. 3602 of 2023 and reply on behalf of respondent was received on 14.12.2023. On last date of hearing, the counsel for the complainant stated that although a conveyance deed has been executed but the possession of the unit is not yet handed over to the complainant and the unit has been further leased to a third party and no lease rentals are being paid and neither the complainant is a confirming party to the lease. The counsel for both the parties state that the above case is similar to the CR No.3592/2023 and hence, both the cases may be heard together on the next date of hearing. Meanwhile both the counsels may file written submissions within 4 weeks with an advance copy to each other.       Matter to come up on 26.09.2024 for further proceedings.

The proxy counsel for the  respondent requests for a short adjournment due to non availability of main counsel.  However, the counsel for the complainant states that although a conveyance deed has been executed but the possession of the unit is not handed over to the complainant  and has been further leased to a third party and no lease rentals are being paid and neither the complainant allottee is a confirming party to the lease.   Matter to come up on 25.07.2024 for further proceedings.

The present complaint was filed on 17.08.2023 and registered as complaint No. 3602 of 2023. The counsel for the complainant states that the complainant has received the copy of reply through post and shall file the same in the registry of the Authority within one week. The respondents are directed to file reply within one week  in the registry. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondents shall be struck off. The counsel for the complainant wishes to file rejoinder to the reply which he may do within a period of 4 weeks with an advance copy to the  respondent. Matter to come up on 21.03.2024 for further proceedings.