Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

BIDISHA BISWAS AND SHAILENDRA KUMAR SHARMA vs EMAAR INDIA LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-7323-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing5 Dec 2024
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • BIDISHA BISWAS AND SHAILENDRA KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent
  • EMAAR INDIA LIMITED

Case Summary

BIDISHA BISWAS AND SHAILENDRA KUMAR SHARMA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-7323-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against EMAAR INDIA LIMITED. The case has undergone 8 hearings over 1 year and 7 months. The case is currently pending. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (8)

  • 5DEC 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Order pronounced. The respondent is directed to pay interest on the paid-up amount by the complainants at the prescribed rate of interest i.e. 11.10%  p.a. for every month of delay from the date of nomination letter  i.e. 06.06.2018  till handing over of possession i.e., 13.10.2018, being earlier as per section 18(1) of the Act of 2016 read with rule 15 of the Rules. Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 10OCT 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 30.11.2022 and registered as complaint no. 7323 of 2022 and the respondent has filed reply to the present complaint on 27.04.2023. On hearing dated 15.02.2024, the counsel for both the parties sought adjournment to explore the possibility of amicable settlement. But till date no settlement deed has been placed on record. On 27.04.2023 along with reply, the counsel for the respondent has filed an application for dismissal of complaint stating that the complaint is barred by limitation. The counsel for the complainant requests for allowing DPC from the due date of possession till offer of possession and the unit was endorsed in favour of the complainant before the said offer of possession. The counsel for the respondent states that the unit was assigned in favour of the complainant on 06.06.2018 and the offer of possession was made on 21.08.2018 and hence, DPC is admissible only for the said period. The counsel for the respondent states that complaint is barred by limitation as the same has been filed after 3 years of offer of possession and even execution of conveyance deed. The counsel for the complainant states that the complainant is seeking DPC after computing the zero period allowed by Supreme Court of India on 10.01.2022 in M.A. No. 21 of 2022 of suo motu writ petition Civil No. 3 of 2020, the complaint is within limitation. The counsel for the respondent wishes to file brief written submissions with relevant citation which may be filed within 2 weeks. Arguments heard. Order reserved. Matter to come up on 05.12.2024 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: RESERVED

  • 25JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 30.11.2022 and registered as complaint no. 7323 of 2022 and the respondent has filed reply to the present complaint on 27.04.2023. On hearing dated 15.02.2024, the counsel for both the parties sought adjournment to explore the possibility of amicable settlement. But till date no settlement deed has been placed on record. On 27.04.2023 along with reply, the counsel for the respondent has filed an application for dismissal of complaint stating that the complaint is barred by limitation. The proxy counsel for the complainant states that the main arguing counsel has to go to Faridabad for attending the Civil Court for some urgent case and hence, requests for a short adjournment. The counsel for the respondent has no objection to it. Matter to come up on 10.10.2024  for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 9MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Since the Presiding Member is on leave, hence, the matter is adjourned to 25.07.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 15FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Both the counsels for the parties state at bar that the settlement talks are going on between the parties and are in progress and request for a short adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 09.05.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 7DEC 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The Presiding Member is on leave . Matter is adjourned to 15.02.2024 for the purpose already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 21SEP 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The counsel for the respondent has stated that the matter is under consideration with the Appellate Tribunal in appeal No.94 of 2022 titled as  Emaar India Ltd versus Ruchika Ahuja in which it has been submitted that apart from other issues involved  in the matter, one of the primary issue which may fall for consideration of this Tribunal on 22.11.2023 would be with respect to effect to execution of conveyance deed prior to filing of complaint and acceptance of compensation by the allottee before the execution of conveyance deed. In view of the same, both the counsels of the parties requests for short adjournment. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 07.12.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 27APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The  present complaint was filed on 30.11.2022 and registered as complaint No. 7323 of 2022. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post.  Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected] and the same is shown to has been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file.  It is proper service of the notice. The  counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant during proceedings and requests for a short adjournment for the reply in the  registry of the authority. The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 11.05.2023 in the registry. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off.  Matter to come up on 21.09.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (10)