Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

MRS SHILA DEVI AND HITENDER KADIAN vs VATIKA LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-410-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing23 Jul 2024
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MRS SHILA DEVI AND HITENDER KADIAN
Respondent
  • VATIKA LIMITED

Case Summary

MRS SHILA DEVI AND HITENDER KADIAN filed Case No. RERA-GRG-410-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against VATIKA LIMITED. The case has undergone 8 hearings over 1 year and 3 months. The case is currently pending. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (8)

  • 23JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    Order pronounced. The respondent is directed to offer the alternate unit of the same size and at the same price which is similarly situated and till the offer of such alternate unit, the respondent shall pay delayed possession interest @ interest i.e. 11% per annum till the offer of alternate unit + 2 months after obtaining occupation certificate from the competent authority whichever is earlier. Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed off.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 16APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 03.02.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was filed on 03.07.2023. On 29.03.2024, complainant has filed a letter giving intimation of regarding non-compliance of direction of Hon’ble Authority. On the last date of hearing i.e., 15.03.2024, the respondent was directed to offer in writing the alternate unit which they want to offer to the complainant within a period of two weeks and complainant to give his/her consent within next one week after offer of the alternative unit and to approach the respondent for signing of the BBA of that alternative unit, if the same is acceptable to both the respondent as well as the complainants. Till date respondent has not made any offer.   Succinct facts of the case as per complaint and annexures are as under: S.N. Particulars Details  1. Name of the project Emilia in Vatika India Next, 82,82A,83,84,85, Gurgaon, Haryana 2.       Nature of project Residential Colony 3.       Area of the project 182.8 acres  4.       Rera registration Registered vide no. 36 of 2022 dated 16.05.2022 valid upto 31.03.2029  5.       DTCP License no. 113 of 2008 dated 01.06.2008 valid upto 31.05.2018 6.       Plot no. Plot no.5, Emilia, 2nd St. Sec-83E, VIN (page 42 of complaint)  7.       Welcome Letter 17.12.2010 (Page no. 40 of complaint) 8. Plot no.  5, block E, street 2, 2nd floor (page 42 of complaint)         9.       Built up area of unit 781.25 sq. ft. (page no. 52 of complaint) Date of allotment letter 25.11.2010 (page 42 of complaint) Date of builder buyer agreement 21.04.2011  (page 49 of complaint) Possession clause Schedule for Possession of the said independent dwelling unit 10.1 That the company based on its present plans and estimates and subject to all just exceptions, contemplates to complete construction of the said building/said independent dwelling unit within a period of three years from the date of execution of this agreement unless there shall be delay or there shall be failure due  to reasons mentioned in clause(11.1), (11.2), (11.3) and clause (38) or due to failure of allottees to pay in time the price of the said independent dwelling unit along with all other charges and dues in accordance with the schedule of payments. Due date of possession 21.04.2014 (calculated from the date of execution of BBA) Total sale consideration Rs. 23,16,419/- (as per BBA page 52 of complaint) Total amount paid by the complainant Rs. 9,44,620/- (as alleged by complainant page 35 of complaint) As agreed by respondent vide termination letter on page 117 of complaint) Termination of builder buyer agreement 06.11.2018  (page 16 of reply) Due to GAIL pipeline Offer of possession Not offered Occupation certificate Not obtained       Arguments heard. Order reserved. Matter to come up on 23.07.2024  for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: RESERVED

  • 15MAR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 03.02.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was filed on 03.07.2023. None for the respondent. The counsel for the complainant states that as per the directions of the Authority vide its order dated 14.12.2023, the respondent was directed to offer alternative unit, the complainant visited the alternative unit offered by the respondent . However, the final decision w.r.t. the allotment of the alternative unit could not be reached out . The respondent is hereby directed to offer in writing the alternate unit which they want to offer to the complainant within a period of two weeks and complainant to give his/her consent within next one week after offer of the alternative unit and to approach the respondent for signing of the BBA of that alternative unit, if the same is acceptable to both the respondent as well as the complainants. Matter to come up on 16.4.2024  for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 23JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Adjourned to 16.04.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 14DEC 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter is adjourned to 23.01.2024.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 28SEP 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint has been received on 03.02.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 03.07.2023. Succinct facts of the case as per complaint and annexures are as under: S.N. Particulars Details 1. Name of the project Emilia in Vatika India Next, 82,82A,83,84,85, Gurgaon, Haryana 2. Date of allotment letter 25.11.2010 (page 42 of complaint) 3. Date of builder buyer agreement 21.04.2011 (page 49 of complaint) 4. Plot no.   5, block E, street 2, floor second (page 42 of complaint) 5. Due date of possession 21.04.2014 6. Total sale consideration Rs. 23,16,419/- 7. Total amount paid by the complainant Rs. 9,44,620/- 8. Termination of builder buyer agreement 06.11.2018 (page 16 of reply) Due to GAIL pipeline 9. Offer of possession Not offered 10. Occupation certificate Not obtained The complainant has sought following relief: Pass an order for restore the booking of the complainants and direct the respondent to handover the actual, physical, vacant possession of the unit. If the respondent is not able to deliver the same unit as booked by the complainant, then direct the respondent to handover another unit of same size in their same project or another project in Gurugram. The counsel for the respondent  requests for a short adjournment to explore the possibility of  amicable settlement and offer of alternate unit to the complainant . However, the complainant present in person states that earlier response of settlement has not yielded positive result and still is open for settlement if respondent is earnest and sincere in its offer. Matter to come up on 14.12.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 11JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The  present complaint has been received on 03.02.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent was received on 03.07.2023. Succinct facts of the case as per complaint and annexures are as under: S.N. Particulars Details 1. Name of the project Emilia in Vatika India Next, 82,82A,83,84,85, Gurgaon, Haryana 2. Date of allotment letter 25.11.2010 (page 42 of complaint) 3. Date of builder buyer agreement 21.04.2011 (page 49 of complaint) 4. Plot no.   5, block E, street 2, floor second (page 42 of complaint) 5. Due date of possession 21.04.2014 6. Total sale consideration Rs. 23,16,419/- 7. Total amount paid by the complainant Rs. 9,44,620/- 8. Termination of builder buyer agreement 06.11.2018 (page 16 of reply) 9. Offer of possession Not offered 10. Occupation certificate Not obtained  The counsel for the complainant requests for delayed possession interest and possession of the unit booked or if the same is not available an alternate unit at the same rate and same price may be allotted. The counsel for the respondent states that the unit has been terminated on   6.11.2018 due to non availability of the unit due to passing of gas pipe line and offer for taking refund/alternative unit  was made vide letter dated 6.11.2018 but there was no response from the complainant-allottee.  However , the counsel  for the complainant  states that the complainant made a request to the respondent to allot alternate unit at the same price and letter was duly acknowledged by the unit.  Total sale consideration of the unit is Rs.27,03,123/- against which the complainant has paid only Rs. 09,44,620/-. The complainant is willing to amend the relief in the complaint  for which he is requested and the request is allowed. Matter to come up on 28.9.2023     for final arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 11APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 03.02.2023 and registered as complaint No. 410 of 2023. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 11.02.2023 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file.  Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected], [email protected] and the same are shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file.  It is proper service of the notice. Written reply has not been filed by the respondent. Shri Dhruv Dutt Sharma Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent and filed power of attorney and requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply.  Respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 25.04.2023   in the registry with a copy to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off. The complainant present in person  requests for an early hearing.    Matter to come up on 11.07.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (10)