Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

ARVIND MAHAJAN AND RASHMI MAHAJAN vs VATIKA LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-7538-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing16 Oct 2024
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • ARVIND MAHAJAN AND RASHMI MAHAJAN
Respondent
  • VATIKA LIMITED

Case Summary

ARVIND MAHAJAN AND RASHMI MAHAJAN filed Case No. RERA-GRG-7538-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against VATIKA LIMITED. The case has undergone 6 hearings over 1 year and 4 months. The case is currently pending. 8 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (6)

  • 16OCT 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant today. On two previous dates also, no one had appeared on behalf of the complainant. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the matter further. It is already 12.35 PM. No further wait is justified. Hence the complaint is dismissed in default for non appearance of the complainant. File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: DISMISSED

  • 24JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint has been filed on 27.12.2022 and the reply was received on 07.11.2023. A rejoinder dated 27.10.2023 had also been filed by the complainants before filing of reply by the respondent. The counsel for the respondent has filed an application during proceedings for withdrawal of power of attorney.   Ms. Ankur Berry and Shri Rahul Singh Advocates have appeared on behalf of the respondent and filed power of attorney today during the proceedings. Further, requests for adjournment received by the counsel of respondent from the counsel for the complainant has been submitted.    Matter to come up on 16.10.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 10APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint has been filed on 27.12.2022 and the reply was received on 07.11.2023. A rejoinder dated 27.10.2023 had also been filed by the complainants before filing of reply by the respondent. Case has been called out but  no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant. The counsel for the respondent states that settlement talks are going on between the parties and further the complainant vide email dated 10.04.2024 has confirmed the same and sought an adjournment.  Matter to come up on 24.07.2024 for filing of settlement deed failing which arguments shall be heard.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 17JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    File taken up today as 17.01.2024 has been declared as a holiday on account of Shri Guru Govind Singh Jayanti, hence the case is adjourned to 10.04.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 18OCT 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 27.12.2022 and registered as complaint No. 7538/2022. Previous cost of Rs. 5000/- has been paid to the counsel for the complainant during proceedings in cash and copy of reply has also supplied during the proceedings. The counsel for the respondent further requests 3 days time to file reply in the registry. It is the last opportunity to file reply  within one week failing which the defence shall be struck off. Matter adjourned to 17.1.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 27.12.2022 and registered as complaint No. 7538 of 2022. Written  reply has not been filed by the respondent. The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply.  Respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 07.06.2023 in the registry with a copy to the complainant subject to payment of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off.  The matter to come up on 18.10.2023  for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (8)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

ffiHARERT: ffi- eunuenAM HARYANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY GURUGRAM ERqIqT T-vr<r frfrqrro srfuowr, WTrq New PWD Rest House, Civil Lines, Gurugram, Haryana a-ql frE6eq.S. trqrg rrf Rfca ar$grrtmqffr-eTulT PROCEEDINGS OF THE DAY 20 Day and Date Wednesday and 16.10.2024 Complaint No.

CR/7538/2022 Case titled as Arvind Mahajan and Rashmi Mahajan VS Vatika Limited Complainant Arvind Mahajan and Rashmi Mahajan Represented through None Respondent Vatika Limited Respondent Represented through Ms.Ankur Berry Advocate Last date ofhearing 24.07.2024 Proceeding Recorded by Naresh Kumari and HR Mehta Proceedings Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant today.

On two previous dates also, no one had appeared on behalf of the complainant.

It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the matter further.

It is already 12.35 PM.

No further wait is justified.

Hence the complaint is dismissed in default for non appearance of the complainant.

File be consigned to the registry.

Ashok Mem t6.1.0.2024 An Authority constituted under section 20 the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 q-riv6r faE-r-ra 3+{ A-6'r{) srfufr{E, 20166r rrm 20+ rd-rra aka crfu6-{ur