KAUSHLENDRA PANDEY AND RIMA PANDEY vs NEO DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.
Party Details
- KAUSHLENDRA PANDEY AND RIMA PANDEY
- NEO DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.
Case Summary
KAUSHLENDRA PANDEY AND RIMA PANDEY filed Case No. RERA-GRG-741-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against NEO DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.. The case has undergone 12 hearings over 2 years and 7 months. The case is currently pending. 22 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (12)
- 22OCT 2024Hearing
Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN
The aforesaid complaint was disposed of vide order dated 05.12.2023 of the authority wherein the complainant was held entitled for assured return from march 2020 till the commencement of the first lease. An application dated 11.03.2024 was filed by the complainant for rectification of order dated 05.12.2023. w.r.t. relief of possession which has not been mentioned in the detailed order. The possession shall be handed over in terms of clause 8 ( e ) of the MoU executed between the parties on 11.08.2017 (Annexure v of the complaint). The Authority observed that there is inadvertent error in the order dated 05.12.2023. The respondent builder is directed to handover the possession of the subject unit to the complainant in terms of the MoU . This order shall be read with the part of main orders dated 5.12.2023. Hence the said rectification is allowed. File be consigned to the registry.
Stage: DISPOSED
- 24SEP 2024Hearing
Judge: N/A
Stage: PENDING
- 10SEP 2024Hearing
Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN
Coram is not complete as the Honble Chairman of the Authority is away to attend 21st General Council Meeting and 6th AGM of AIFORERA at Mussoorie Uttarakhand hence the matter is adjourned to 24.09.2024 for the purpose as already fixed.
Stage: PENDING
Orders (22)
- 22OCT 2024judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 22OCT 2024orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 24SEP 2024orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
ffiHARERT:, ffi, eunuenArrl HARYANA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY GURUGRAM efrqr"n +1-vrcr ftftqrq-o qrft)rf,wt, rId-{rtl Ne* jlvD R"tt Hout", Ciril , 'ft'.=.1! -!alt 'l=l,Eti.1 aEL r'qr]l ry _ .1.*P]IG_S OF-THEDAY .
Day and Date TuesdaY and 22.10.2024 10 Complaint No.
MA NO.
16612024 in CR1741.12022 Cas titled as Kushlendra Pandey and Reem Pandey VS Neo developers Private Limited Kushlendra Pandey and Reema Pandey Complainant Represented through Shri Rahul Singh Advocate Respondent Neo developers Private t,imited Shri Gunjan Kumar Advocate 2+.Og-.2024 Naresh Kunrari and LIII.
Mehta Respondent Represented Last date of hearing Proceeding Recorded bY Proceed The aforesaid comPlaint was disP authority wherein the comPlainan march 2020 till the commencem( 11.03.2024 was filed bY the cor 05.12.2023. w.r.t. relief of possess detailed order.
The possession shi of the MoU executed between the complaint).
The Authority observed that the 05.1.2.2023. l'he resPondent bui Id the subject unit to the complainan .
This order shall be read with the Hence the said rectification [s allo re is inadvertent error irt er is directed to handover t in terms of the MoU part of main orders dated wed.
File be consigned to , the order dat the possession 5.1,2.2023. the registry. ings-cum-orders osed of vide order dated 05.1,2.2023 of tl t was held entitled for assured return fro :nt of the first lease.
An application datt nplainant for rectification of order datt ;ion which has not been n'rentioned in tl lll be handed over in terms oI clause [] [ t r parties on 11.08.2017 (Annexure v of tl frE'.r qrtq, Efi-r{run [,l ,rrtr-iity .o.,"tiir-t.A ,r,a". "-*pL ZO 1111 R"JE-ila 1i{"g,Lin]n-ttntl l)e.vckrlxrr('rrr'1 r\ct' '20I(r I ..-l ,, I ,] I l the om ted ted the e) he -ed Lof i-Jii--,ftnfi er.
Atrrl cfuftqc, zoref,t rm io* q*Ta rfta ctfuq'ror